|
Something to consider... all you X users - (pg. 13)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Dmatrox |
| 60% of all statistics are true. 20% of all statistics are false, and 20% of all statistics is made up. |
|
|
| DJ-Fuq |
| quote: | Originally posted by Paradigm
will step back and see how petty these things are... |
Some of the things said are petty, but the issue isnt. Full drug legalisation would be 1 of the best things that could happen to the world.
Plus, this thread is pretty educational, if u wade through all the prohibitionist e. |
|
|
| DJ-Fuq |
| quote: | Originally posted by jdjd
if you say so... id like you to tell your theories of how recreational drugs are safe to jones'ing crackhead on the street |
If the drugs were legal, there would be less crackheads on the street. |
|
|
| montie |
SHUT UP
use only the drugs
be happy |
|
|
| Paradigm |
| Off topic, but that's a sweet avatar, Dmatrox. :D |
|
|
| SuperFarStucker |
| quote: | Originally posted by Dmatrox
60% of all statistics are true. 20% of all statistics are false, and 20% of all statistics is made up. |
I assume you are referring to my lengthy statistic filled post. Most of it (all.. actually) stems from gubbiment collected information so it's accuracy is ... well, how accurate is the government ?
Your statistic is completely wrong too, the total of statistics that are true and false has to equal 100% and the third is an independant variable (a made up statistic can be true, though it's extremely unlikely). Also, I believe the nature of such a statistic makes it really nearly impossible to accurately project. I realize (or hope) it was a joke. |
|
|
| occrider |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ-Fuq
Some of the things said are petty, but the issue isnt. Full drug legalisation would be 1 of the best things that could happen to the world. |
Remove all elements of socialized health care then I would be in 100% agreeance. Essentially, if you your body up, you pay for it ... if you can't, than tough . |
|
|
| SuperFarStucker |
| quote: | Originally posted by occrider
Remove all elements of socialized health care then I would be in 100% agreeance. Essentially, if you your body up, you pay for it ... if you can't, than tough . |
You do realize that the load on our economy right now is probably, no, definetely more than it would be if drugs were legalized and healthcare for drug users was still included. Not to mention we don't even have socialized health care in the states. Insurance isn't socialized, besides, insurance still covers alcoholics and smokers, does it not? Adjust accordingly...
If we did have socialized health care, a tax could be added to drugs to account for said problem. *If* that created a new 'black market' (undercutting prices...) then perhaps giving drug users socialized healthcare could be reviewed.
Of course, this is terribly off topic and this is my last post in this thread... |
|
|
| Orbax |
| quote: | Originally posted by SuperFarStucker
.
Of course, this is terribly off topic and this is my last post in this thread... |
why? |
|
|
| DJ-Fuq |
| quote: | Originally posted by occrider
Remove all elements of socialized health care then I would be in 100% agreeance. Essentially, if you your body up, you pay for it ... if you can't, than tough . |
There would be far less cases of people ing themselves up, because the drugs would be free of harmful additives, the users would always have clean needles or whatever is needed, overdoses would be unlikely as the exact potency is known and the drugs would come with instructions etc
And if experience is anything to go by, there would be less drug users too. |
|
|
| montie |
| quote: | Originally posted by occrider
Remove all elements of socialized health care then I would be in 100% agreeance. Essentially, if you your body up, you pay for it ... if you can't, than tough . |
what about all that money we are spending on the drug war? |
|
|
|
|
