|
i GOT MY iq SCORE (pg. 7)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| jdjd |
| quote: | Originally posted by igottaknow
---------------------------------------------------
30. True knowledge exists in knowing that you know ___________.
*Everything, Nothing, The truth, The weather, The meaning of life
absolute knowledge you would need to know everything but is this a trick question because its impossible to know everything, so is the answer nothing? |
I put nothing, but these questions are kind of stupid to have on an iq test since they are open to interpretation... |
|
|
| Dmatrox |
| quote: | Originally posted by davinox
wtf. a 10 year old should know much less than a 70 year old. first off, i dont believe you, and secondly, that's dumb.
the equation is:
Mental Age / Physical Age X 100
if you are 10, and score what the average 20 year old makes, you have a mental age of 20 and a physical age of 10, so you have an IQ of 200
yet if you are 20 and have the iq of 200, you have what the average 40 year old makes?????? see, iq tests are ed then. |
I think the equation you have there is outdated. I think it said in a psych textbook that this was the first use of IQ tests. |
|
|
| Dr. Cfire |
| I got a 164 from a real IQ test. |
|
|
| DJ-Fuq |
| quote: | Originally posted by jdjd
LOL fuq is the guy that said that alcohol is safer than any illegal drug out there :crazy: |
I said it was more dangerous.
Heres what i said:
"Alcohol is more dangerous, immediately and long term, than any illegal drug due to its effects."
 |
|
|
| DJ-Fuq |
| quote: | Originally posted by davinox
wtf. a 10 year old should know much less than a 70 year old. first off, i dont believe you, and secondly, that's dumb.
|
I said the figures werent exact, it was just an example. But anyway, iq measures intelligence, not knowledge. Theres a big difference.
If u have an iq of 100, u have the average intelligence for ur age group.
Basically, if a child, a 35 year old and an old person get the same answers right in an iq test, the child and the old person will get a higher iq score than the 35 year old. |
|
|
| DrUg_Tit0 |
| quote: | Originally posted by davinox
wtf. a 10 year old should know much less than a 70 year old. first off, i dont believe you, and secondly, that's dumb.
the equation is:
Mental Age / Physical Age X 100
if you are 10, and score what the average 20 year old makes, you have a mental age of 20 and a physical age of 10, so you have an IQ of 200
yet if you are 20 and have the iq of 200, you have what the average 40 year old makes?????? see, iq tests are ed then. |
Um, no, it's your way of thinking that is ed because those equations you wrote don't work beyond childhood, and even during childhood they're not very accurate. You see, the function of intelligence in relation to age for an average individual looks somewhat like this:
code:
^int.
| _-------__
| _/ \---___
| _---/ \---___
| _/ \--___
| _- \--__
| /
| -
| /
|/__________________________________________________> age
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
So the only semi-linear part is that of between ages 0 and about 15. Beyond that it doesn't make sense to use that formula of yours.
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ-Fuq
I said it was more dangerous.
Heres what i said:
"Alcohol is more dangerous, immediately and long term, than any illegal drug due to its effects." |
Yeah, it's true you said that. Although that claim is even more rediculous, considering there are drugs such as heroin, crack, datura, mandrake... |
|
|
| DJ-Fuq |
| quote: | Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0
Yeah, it's true you said that. Although that claim is even more rediculous, considering there are drugs such as heroin, crack, datura, mandrake... |
Ur a bell end
Opiates = VERY ing safe
Crack = safer than alcohol
datura and mandrake = legal
|
|
|
| TranceGeek |
when i was at uni 3 years ago, i took one of those optional IQ tests administered by them and scored something like 149 i think...
but in all honesty, i don't believe in IQ tests at all, i think its a wrong measure of intelligence... i think if they really want to test it, they should come up with an interactive tests, one where questions are tailored specifically to each person...
meh |
|
|
| DrUg_Tit0 |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ-Fuq
Ur a bell end
Opiates = VERY ing safe
Crack = safer than alcohol
datura and mandrake = legal |
Yes, datura and mandrake are actually legal now that I think of it. But saying that heroine and crack are very safe and safer than alcohol is just about the stupidest nonsense I've ever heard. I mean, I can understand when someone claims marijuana or hash are safer than alcohol, but come on, heroin??? If you're trying to disprove my points, then disprove those that you think are false, but don't allow your frustration to cloud your judgement and to attack everything I say.
| quote: | | |
Ya, this image just shows your mental age. |
|
|
| DJ-Fuq |
| quote: | Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0
Yes, datura and mandrake are actually legal now that I think of it. But saying that heroine and crack are very safe and safer than alcohol is just about the stupidest nonsense I've ever heard. |
Didnt u say, or at least try to act as if u know about this subject? Why do people lie so much, and then make it so obvious?
And i didnt say crack was very safe, i said it was safer.
| quote: | | If you're trying to disprove my points, then disprove those that you think are false, but don't allow your frustration to cloud your judgement and to attack everything I say. |
U could try taking some of ur own advice. And some of mine, which was to not bother trying to prove me wrong, because i already know all the retorts and why theyre wrong.
Ive basically given up hope for u. It doesnt matter what i say, u wont believe it anyway, or ull try to wriggle out of it with sarcasm/avoid the point (prohibitionist trickery).
When someones been led to believe something all their life, its very hard to change their mind. Its still possible in some cases, but i think ur just too determined to believe what its easier to believe for that now. U dont want to change ur mind, so chances are u either wont or u will but pretend u didnt, because ur probably not mature enough to admit that u were wrong.
But i wont try to wriggle out of this like u would if it was me asking the question, so i will answer u.
| quote: | | I mean, I can understand when someone claims marijuana or hash are safer than alcohol, but come on, heroin??? |
Yes, heroin. Firstly, i cant think of anything safer than heroin (well, opiates in general) apart from cannabis.
Anyway, diamorphine (heroin) is VERY safe, and ill tell u why.
There are 4 negative effects associated with street heroin, 3 of which only exist because of prohibition and the other 1 is only really a negative effect because of prohibition.
1. Risk of overdose
2. Impurities in the drug
3. Danger of damaging urself because of bad injecting technique
4. Addiction
So:
1. If heroin was legal, the risk of overdosing would be nil, basically. Overdoses happen because a person currently has no way of knowing how pure their heroin is, so when they get some unusually strong stuff, they can take too much accidentally.
2. Obviously if it was legal, there would be no impurities at all.
3. If it was legal, the users would be properly educated on how to inject properly (and provided with enough clean needles), and would then avoid problems such as collapsed veins.
Theyre the 3 risks caused CREATED by prohibition.
4. Heroin is addictive, as u know. Thats not really so much of a negative effect in itself. The negative part comes from the fact that it currently costs so much. If it was legal and cheap, there is no reason why a heroin addict couldnt live as normal a live as someone whos addicted to nicotine.
So, pharmaceutical grade diamorphine is safe and will not present any problems to the user. Hope this clears that up.
I dont think i have to go into all the problems that clean, legal alcohol can cause for comparison. |
|
|
| DrUg_Tit0 |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ-Fuq
Didnt u say, or at least try to act as if u know about this subject? Why do people lie so much, and then make it so obvious?
And i didnt say crack was very safe, i said it was safer. |
I've made a mistake and admited it. You might learn something from it.
| quote: | U could try taking some of ur own advice. And some of mine, which was to not bother trying to prove me wrong, because i already know all the retorts and why theyre wrong.
Ive basically given up hope for u. It doesnt matter what i say, u wont believe it anyway, or ull try to wriggle out of it with sarcasm/avoid the point (prohibitionist trickery). |
Actually, no. I admit when I'm wrong, like you can see in this example.
| quote: |
Yes, heroin. Firstly, i cant think of anything safer than heroin (well, opiates in general) apart from cannabis.
Anyway, diamorphine (heroin) is VERY safe, and ill tell u why.
There are 4 negative effects associated with street heroin, 3 of which only exist because of prohibition and the other 1 is only really a negative effect because of prohibition.
1. Risk of overdose
2. Impurities in the drug
3. Danger of damaging urself because of bad injecting technique
4. Addiction
So:
1. If heroin was legal, the risk of overdosing would be nil, basically. Overdoses happen because a person currently has no way of knowing how pure their heroin is, so when they get some unusually strong stuff, they can take too much accidentally. |
Not really. Alcohol bottles have exact percentages of alcohol written on them. And still it often happens that people take too much. Now, to die because of an alcohol overdose is possible but you really have to be a special sort of idiot to do that to yourself. With heroin it's much easier, as there are smaller quantities involved. It's easier to shoot up an extra several grams than to drink an additional bottle of disguisting schnaps. So I might agree that a ratio of non-overdose/overdose injections would decrease, but since the number of users would increase, the total number of deaths would likely go up.
| quote: | | 2. Obviously if it was legal, there would be no impurities at all. |
Now, how many times have I seen articles where people got sick and died because of faulty alcoholic drinks containing methane or antifreeze.
| quote: | | 3. If it was legal, the users would be properly educated on how to inject properly (and provided with enough clean needles), and would then avoid problems such as collapsed veins. |
Don't be so sure on that one. Medical patients who require constant injections often suffer from the same problem of collapsed veins. A simple fact is that if you shoot up a needle into your vain on a regular basis, it will likely deteriorate.
| quote: | Theyre the 3 risks caused CREATED by prohibition.
4. Heroin is addictive, as u know. Thats not really so much of a negative effect in itself. The negative part comes from the fact that it currently costs so much. If it was legal and cheap, there is no reason why a heroin addict couldnt live as normal a live as someone whos addicted to nicotine. |
Oh, so you'd have a large population of people all hooked on heroine? How can you say that's not a negative effect??? With cigarettes it's not that difficult to stop. Of course, people go through abstinence crises, but their magnitude is nowhere as near that of heroin. Heroin causes strong physical addiction, and once a person gets addicted to it, it's a really big problem on letting go. Cigarettes are nothing in comparison. Besides, imagine what would happen if for some reason a country's import of heroin is severed. You'd have thousands if not millions of people suffering pain and agony. Not to mention the ability of the government to manipulate those addicted masses. You'd have a huge part of population willing to blindly obey whatever the heroine producers say just to get their little shot.
| quote: | So, pharmaceutical grade diamorphine is safe and will not present any problems to the user. Hope this clears that up.
I dont think i have to go into all the problems that clean, legal alcohol can cause for comparison. |
If the amount of people on heroin would equal to the amount of people on alcohol, the society would fall apart in a matter of days. The reason for that is, as I've already mentioned, strong physical addiction. I really hope I don't have to reiterate my Opium war example again. It clearly shows what happens when a country is filled with addicts, even if the drug is legal. |
|
|
|
|
