return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 
Supersaw VSTi Version 04 (pg. 3)
View this Thread in Original format
Stephenox
Wow, that virus sample you put up sounds really warm and nice. ;-)
alanzo
I played around with it for another hour or so.. I've never really listened very closely to a jp8080 but I don't imagine it would sound a whole lot different from this ;)

there are still a couple problems with the sound quality.. too much ringing.. and there is a bit of a "digital mark" - but both are minor and I'm sure they will be fixed in future versions..

the icing on top of the cake is that it's pretty good with CPU useage.. good job ross
thecYrus
it sounds very good as long as the filter is not full open. then it sounds very thin and has no life/atmosphere..
Trancevision
thanks for sharing. Sounds really good regarding it to be a free VSTi. Better Superwave in my opinion.

Trancevision
KilldaDJ
good synth.

well programmed. i like it, nice one rb

well heres what i managed to get out of it

sample

but i used a pro53 for the bass and lots of fx on the supersaw
rb2k1
UPDATE ALREADY? :P

Version 02 is available..

See 1st post for details..

~Ross B
acell
nice work ross,

just wondering.. how far are you going to take this vsti?
a 8080 style interface would be nuts! ;)

might just try modeling it in 3d just for fun :)
kewlness
sounds quite a lot better since the last time i heard it ross... top work on the synth...

I like the filter quite a lot but the synth has a kinda buzzy digital sound to it that i think could be fixed up a bit
Dance123
quote:
Originally posted by Massive84
JP has a better filter, the sounds are warmer and more bright than this software, but this one ross made is really good, quite impressive.

Alanzo
your first saw is to ugly to much detune.

second one sounds nice.

Hi Ross, best sounding supersaw VSTi so far, but I agree with Massive84 that it doesn't sound as bright as the real thing. I tried the classic superstring song sound and even with the filter full open and resonance set to 50% it still doesn't sound as bright as the JP8000 I think. Perhaps it's the EQ that makes the difference, so perhaps it would be a good idea to implement some EQ settings in the VSTi! Would this be possible to do?!

Here is my attempt with the Supersaw VSTi with filter full open and resonance to 50% but it still doesn't sound that bright:
http://users.skynet.be/soundfiles/supersaw_vsti.wav What do you people think?

Here are the original samples (strings and lead) from the Cygnus X song which seems to sound much more brighter then what I came up:
http://users.skynet.be/soundfiles/o...superstring.wav
http://users.skynet.be/soundfiles/o...string_lead.wav

Note: the final 2 sounds are actually mp3 files with the .wav extension. Soundforge let you save them like this! Windows Media Player should play them fine. Let me know if any of the links don't work or play!!

How can I get this sound so bright like the original or isn't that possible with this VSTi?!!

If it's only EQ that makes the difference, could you please implement the necessary EQ parameters in the VSTi, so I can see how it should be done cause I am not good at setting EQ's so it would be nice if the VSTi would have it implemented as part of a patch?! Could you please do this? Thanks!!
acell
quote:
Originally posted by Dance123
Hi Ross, best sounding supersaw VSTi so far, but I agree with Massive84 that it doesn't sound as bright as the real thing. I tried the classic superstring song sound and even with the filter full open and resonance set to 50% it still doesn't sound as bright as the JP8000 I think. Perhaps it's the EQ that makes the difference, so perhaps it would be a good idea to implement some EQ settings in the VSTi! Would this be possible to do?!

Here is my attempt with the Supersaw VSTi with filter full open and resonance to 50% but it still doesn't sound that bright:
http://users.skynet.be/soundfiles/supersaw_vsti.wav What do you people think?

Here are the original samples (strings and lead) from the Cygnus X song which seems to sound much more brighter then what I came up:
http://users.skynet.be/soundfiles/o...superstring.wav
http://users.skynet.be/soundfiles/o...string_lead.wav

Note: the final 2 sounds are actually mp3 files with the .wav extension. Soundforge let you save them like this! Windows Media Player should play them fine. Let me know if any of the links don't work or play!!

How can I get this sound so bright like the original or isn't that possible with this VSTi?!!

If it's only EQ that makes the difference, could you please implement the necessary EQ parameters in the VSTi, so I can see how it should be done cause I am not good at setting EQ's so it would be nice if the VSTi would have it implemented as part of a patch?! Could you please do this? Thanks!!


i'd say it's your eqing my friend.. have a listen to this i did this in less then a min as i'm @ work.. speakers here arn't to good as well.. but yeah.. :)

Dance123
quote:
Originally posted by acell
i'd say it's your eqing my friend.. have a listen to this i did this in less then a min as i'm @ work.. speakers here arn't to good as well.. but yeah.. :)

Acell, did you simply use some EQ on my sample or did you create it from zero. In any event, it sounds much better then my attempt. What would help is if you could perhaps could post a screenshot of the EQ you used so I can see what I did wrong! (perhaps also the patch + screenshot of the VSTi in case I programmed it wrong from the start ;) ) Thanks!!

to Ross: if EQ makes that much difference (I never realized this before), then could you perhaps please implement the necessary EQ parameters in your VSTi?! Would be really helpfull! Thanks!! :)
acell
don't mean to hijack the thread.. dance123:


noting special.. and very rough.. could do with more time and better speakers to hear it.. but yeah... you can do this with any eq plugin.. i've use the waves q8 plugin.. you can do it with fruitys parametric (sp?) eq.. bringing it up around the 8000 mark... lower it in the muddy section (around 250).. and walah :)

i applied that setting to your mp3
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 
Privacy Statement