Originally posted by Marc Summers
Northwoods? Oh thanks, I didn't know about this declassified document that means absolutely nothing! :rolleyes:
And... Wikipedia? Come on now.
oh come on! surely you can see the relevance of what a previous US administration did over 40 years ago! :rolleyes:
Trancer-X
quote:
Originally posted by Marc Summers
Northwoods? Oh thanks, I didn't know about this declassified document that means absolutely nothing! :rolleyes:
And... Wikipedia? Come on now.
Yeah, it's been declassified. So?
You're not that inept that you can't scroll down to the dozens of links (and footnotes) on that Wikipedia page, are you?
Maybe you folks could learn to do some of your own due diligence for once in your lives rather than having to depend on people like myself to spoonfeed it to you.
Trancer-X
I thought that this was pretty funny
Trancer-X
even more effective, though:
colonelcrisp
quote:
Originally posted by Trancer-X
I thought that this was pretty funny
one of the many reasons i cant take any of you CT'ers seriously......
Trancer-X
quote:
Originally posted by colonelcrisp
one of the many reasons i cant take any of you CT'ers seriously......
Why, because we're not falsely arrogant, naively unaware and/or blindly obedient to authority?
Or is it simply because we're always figuring out new ways of bringing public attention to something that the corporate media is complicit in covering up?
colonelcrisp
quote:
Originally posted by Trancer-X
Why, because we're not falsely arrogant, naively unaware and/or blindly obedient to authority?
Or is it simply because we're always figuring out new ways of bringing public attention to something that the corporate media is complicit in covering up?
so resorting to disturbing / prankster methods is a mature way to open debate?
Trancer-X
quote:
Originally posted by colonelcrisp
so resorting to disturbing / prankster methods is a mature way to open debate?
When you have a corrupt, blatantly distorting and/or grossly under-reporting corporate media that refuses to even mention the pleas of the 9/11 Widows, sure. Why not? Some people seem to want to do whatever the hell it takes to get you and the rest of the herd to snap out of your comas. I don't think getting on a loudspeaker is all that bad. At least it's something different.
Trancer-X
I still think that WTC7 is very important especially since it wasn't hit by an airplane.
quote:
Going by the evidence presented in this video, it appears that the explosions began in WTC 7 before the other two towers ever even fell!!! This is the same building that housed Rudy Guilliani's Emergency Command Center as well as the Securities & Exchange Commission (which was in the middle of investigating the Enron scandal)
(Includes commentary from Dutch DEMOLITION EXPERT Danny Jowenko)
[[ LINK REMOVED ]]
UPDATED VIDEO
[[ LINK REMOVED ]]
The Arbiter
Have you noticed that everyones ignoring you? Although probably, in your little world we're all so flabbergasted by your conclusive evidence that we dare not post. Either way, I dont think anyone can be bothered anymore mate.
hardcore trancer
lol This is just great.At the same time I think Bill should discuss this once in this show and have a debate about it.I highly doubt it tho.
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
I think Bill should discuss this once in this show and have a debate about it.
only the troofers think there's a debate still to be had. why give credence to a bunch of nonsense and internet detectives?
quote:
Denialism: the employment of rhetorical tactics to give the appearance of argument or legitimate debate, when in actuality there is none. These false arguments are used when one has few or no facts to support one's viewpoint against a scientific consensus or against overwhelming evidence to the contrary. They are effective in distracting from actual useful debate using emotionally appealing, but ultimately empty and illogical assertions.
Examples of common topics in which Denialists employ their tactics include: Creationism/Intelligent Design, Global Warming Denialism, Holocaust Denial, HIV/AIDS Denialism, 9/11 conspiracies, tobacco carcinogenecity denialism (the first organized corporate campaign), anti-vaccination/mercury autism denialism and anti-animal testing/animal rights extremist denialism. Denialism spans the ideological spectrum, and is about tactics rather than politics or partisanship.
We believe there are five simple guidelines for identifying denialist arguments. Most denialist arguments will incorporate more than one of the following tactics: Conspiracy, Selectivity, False Experts, Impossible Expectations/Moving Goalposts, and Argument from Metaphor/violations of informal logic.
