return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 
Why do men like Boobs? (pg. 4)
View this Thread in Original format
CraveTheRave
Am I the only guy that thinks like this or does everyone else feel that you can see all sides and angles of the breast but if the nipple is covered, it's all for not? Gotta see the nipple :D
Moral Hazard
quote:
Originally posted by CraveTheRave
Am I the only guy that thinks like this or does everyone else feel that you can see all sides and angles of the breast but if the nipple is covered, it's all for not? Gotta see the nipple :D


+1.... if you don't see nipple it doesn't count
shades_of_gray
quote:
Originally posted by Nou
more than a handful is a waste!



sounds like your not getting any tit then.


a nice B or C cup....i think that is perfect....im more an ass man, but there you go

my ex was bloody 34E :eyes:
DJ_TWiLiGHT
quote:
Originally posted by shades_of_gray

my ex was bloody 34E :eyes:


I thought those were jsut the subject of many myths
shades_of_gray
quote:
Originally posted by DJ_TWiLiGHT
I thought those were jsut the subject of many myths



oooo no.....they do exist....hers didnt sag tho, and she had both her nips pierced, mystery they didnt xplode
DJ_TWiLiGHT
quote:
Originally posted by shades_of_gray
oooo no.....they do exist....hers didnt sag tho, and she had both her nips pierced, mystery they didnt xplode


that big with no saggy. . .was she fit? I mean, I've dated the grrls with just teh D and they sagged like what. I do enjoy a piercing every once in a while.

Exploding Boobie. . .HAHAHAHAHA:stongue:
est
quote:
Originally posted by Aquarian
You're spot on. Large breasts mean nuttrition for the offspring.


Why would large breasts mean better nutrition for a child? Breast size is dictated by the amount of fat under the skin, not the quality/quantity of milk ducts. Women with small breasts are as capable of feeding a child as women with larger breasts.

Evolutionary theories are pure speculation. Becuase evolutionary psychology is interested in human behaviour, theories are based on observatiuon of people today (as opposed to bodily evolution, where we can look at tangible evidence like fossils e.t.c.). Consider also the other influences on behaviour (culture e.t.c.). Just because our genes were there when we were born doesn't make them the ultimate influence of our behaviour.

I'm sure evolution does have an influence over our behaviour, but it's all too easy to overestimate the strength of that influence.
Floorfiller
quote:
Originally posted by est
Why would large breasts mean better nutrition for a child? Breast size is dictated by the amount of fat under the skin, not the quality/quantity of milk ducts. Women with small breasts are as capable of feeding a child as women with larger breasts.

Evolutionary theories are pure speculation. Becuase evolutionary psychology is interested in human behaviour, theories are based on observatiuon of people today (as opposed to bodily evolution, where we can look at tangible evidence like fossils e.t.c.). Consider also the other influences on behaviour (culture e.t.c.). Just because our genes were there when we were born doesn't make them the ultimate influence of our behaviour.

I'm sure evolution does have an influence over our behaviour, but it's all too easy to overestimate the strength of that influence.


wow that post was way too smart for all these people saying "omg boobs"

but yeah you're right...
Jackson
quote:
Originally posted by est
Why would large breasts mean better nutrition for a child? Breast size is dictated by the amount of fat under the skin, not the quality/quantity of milk ducts. Women with small breasts are as capable of feeding a child as women with larger breasts.

Evolutionary theories are pure speculation. Becuase evolutionary psychology is interested in human behaviour, theories are based on observatiuon of people today (as opposed to bodily evolution, where we can look at tangible evidence like fossils e.t.c.). Consider also the other influences on behaviour (culture e.t.c.). Just because our genes were there when we were born doesn't make them the ultimate influence of our behaviour.

I'm sure evolution does have an influence over our behaviour, but it's all too easy to overestimate the strength of that influence.


I'm not argueing with you, just asking... Why do you think men are attreacted to them? And i dont think that mens attraction to them has just started recently, this has been going on for thousands of years....surely the reason why we've liked boobs since we were cavemen isn't because there wasnt any other source of pillow to use in the cave! :p
Orbax
I like the bottom of boobs. They are rounder and you dont get to see em as much

tribu
quote:
Originally posted by Orbax
I like the bottom of boobs. They are rounder and you dont get to see em as much


Theyre also very sensitive to patterned stimulation using the fronts of your fingernails...
shades_of_gray
quote:
Originally posted by DJ_TWiLiGHT
that big with no saggy. . .was she fit? I mean, I've dated the grrls with just teh D and they sagged like what. I do enjoy a piercing every once in a while.

Exploding Boobie. . .HAHAHAHAHA:stongue:


lol
they stuck out like a couple loafs of bread

yeah she was quite fit, blonde.......but she wasnt really my type, bit dappy really
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 
Privacy Statement