|
Plasma vs LCD
|
View this Thread in Original format
| TranceLuver4evr |
As you guys know the prices of flat panels are dropping like crazy. I've been holding off and I've found a couple of good deals. Problem is I couldn't decide if I want a plasma or a LCD
I'm looking @ 2 TVs now and they are both around $1500 out the door
First it's the Samsung LNS4051, a 40in LCD

or
Hitachi 42HDS69, a 42in Plasma

They both have at least 2 HDMI input but the Hitachi have "low" 1080i resolution
If you guys want to see the full specs. I can post it also
Let me know what you guys thing :D |
|
|
| TigerClaw |
| I would go for LCD, Mainly cause Plasma screens are proned to getting burn ins on there screens. |
|
|
| kid nyce |
this has the potential of being a monumental thread, discussion, and debate from which 90% of the contents would be based on personal opinion and brand loyalty.
So I'll start it off....
I went Sony because I'm loyal to Sony
I went LCD because I believe LCD has a longer life than plasma, plasma is said to show burn-in after 2-3 years, where as LCD is approximately 5-10years.
I purchased my LCD about a year ago for $2800, Sony Bravia KDL-V40XBR1, at the time it went for $3500MSRP and I paid 28 cash and walked with it. |
|
|
| TigerClaw |
| The prices on LCD HDTVs have gone down and they are way cheaper then Plasma TVs. |
|
|
| Magnus |
| I recently picked up an LCD TV, the Polaroid FLM3232, for 899. I picked it because of the price of course, but also because of the unit's design which is very sleek. It had all the inputs I wanted including HDMI. The picture leaves nothing to be desired and honestly when I saw it sitting next to similar models that were 500+, the picture was not that different and I'm a picky son of a bitch. If I were you, I'd go with the 40" Samsung LCD. I would have loved to have bought that instead but I didn't want to pay the extra $$$. |
|
|
| yujie__ |
| So which better? I too am deciding between the Sharp Aquos 40 and the Sony Bravia 40s2010 or XBR 40? |
|
|
| kid nyce |
| quote: | Originally posted by yujie__
So which better? I too am deciding between the Sharp Aquos 40 and the Sony Bravia 40s2010 or XBR 40? |
you want an opinion from a sony brand whore? sharp sets are nice but the only other LCD that I'd even dare venture away from Sony for is Samsung |
|
|
| TSG |
I too was having a hard time deciding on whether to get plasma or projection. I recently heard that after awhile the Sony projection TV starts to get this green effect on the screen. Cross that one out.
I then thought about a plasma TV but just found out that is uses quite a bit of electrical juice.
So... yesterday, I finally made up my mind and decided to get the TV that I've wanted ever since I started checking out all the new LCDs. It will be my birthday & Christmas gift to ME!!!!
*drum roll*
Samsung 50" DLP™ HDTV (HL-S5087W)

50" DLP™ HDTV: At the heart of Samsung’s Digital Light processing (DLP) projection TV technology is the Cinema Smooth™ 1080p Light Engine. The light engine produces a superb picture that has no readily visible pixels (screen dots). No pixel visibility means the TV picture is incredibly smooth and sharp—like film.
DLP™ benefits: DLP is an award-winning (micro-mirror) projection TV technology used by many commercial movie theaters. DLP cost-effectively offers a big, clear HD picture—yet DLP TVs are much slimmer than most other projection TVs. Plus, with DLP, you don't have to worry about screen burn-in or convergence errors.
Highest resolution available: Featuring an HD resolution of 1080p, the Samsung HL-S5087W offers the highest definition screen currently available. Plus, the HD tuner is built-in, so there is no need to buy an extra component.
Innovative design: The TV has a streamlined, clean design that complements any room décor, including a “hidden” speaker with a slanted bevel edge that tucks under the screen.
Picture optimization: Samsung's DNIe™ technology boosts the quality of the TV images for pictures that have greater depth and more accurate colors. A great contrast ratio (up to 10,000:1) means the TV picture is always vibrant, not washed out.
Quality sound: SRS TruSurround XT fills your room with powerful, true-to-life sound.
Great features: This TV is fully loaded with a host of great features, including adjustable color temperatures, game mode (a setting tailored for video gaming), an auto volume leveler (to prevent sudden sound bursts during commercials), previous channel, a V-chip, and more.
Full range of A/V inputs: Includes HDMI, component video, S-video, composite video, PC and USB connections |
|
|
| TigerClaw |
| I wouldn't go for the DLP. The reason cause? Well at some point, The bulb would go out and you have to replace the bulb itself. They cost about 200 bucks to replace. |
|
|
| Viol8tor |
| quote: | Originally posted by TSG
I too was having a hard time deciding on whether to get plasma or projection. I recently heard that after awhile the Sony projection TV starts to get this green effect on the screen. Cross that one out.
I then thought about a plasma TV but just found out that is uses quite a bit of electrical juice.
So... yesterday, I finally made up my mind and decided to get the TV that I've wanted ever since I started checking out all the new LCDs. It will be my birthday & Christmas gift to ME!!!!
*drum roll*
Samsung 50" DLP™ HDTV (HL-S5087W)

50" DLP™ HDTV: At the heart of Samsung’s Digital Light processing (DLP) projection TV technology is the Cinema Smooth™ 1080p Light Engine. The light engine produces a superb picture that has no readily visible pixels (screen dots). No pixel visibility means the TV picture is incredibly smooth and sharp—like film.
DLP™ benefits: DLP is an award-winning (micro-mirror) projection TV technology used by many commercial movie theaters. DLP cost-effectively offers a big, clear HD picture—yet DLP TVs are much slimmer than most other projection TVs. Plus, with DLP, you don't have to worry about screen burn-in or convergence errors.
Highest resolution available: Featuring an HD resolution of 1080p, the Samsung HL-S5087W offers the highest definition screen currently available. Plus, the HD tuner is built-in, so there is no need to buy an extra component.
Innovative design: The TV has a streamlined, clean design that complements any room décor, including a “hidden” speaker with a slanted bevel edge that tucks under the screen.
Picture optimization: Samsung's DNIe™ technology boosts the quality of the TV images for pictures that have greater depth and more accurate colors. A great contrast ratio (up to 10,000:1) means the TV picture is always vibrant, not washed out.
Quality sound: SRS TruSurround XT fills your room with powerful, true-to-life sound.
Great features: This TV is fully loaded with a host of great features, including adjustable color temperatures, game mode (a setting tailored for video gaming), an auto volume leveler (to prevent sudden sound bursts during commercials), previous channel, a V-chip, and more.
Full range of A/V inputs: Includes HDMI, component video, S-video, composite video, PC and USB connections |
I was actually looking into getting a new TV and also had my eyes on this exact one.
Can you give me a quick little review? Pro's and Cons? how much did you end up spending for it?..in a non-nosey way.:tongue2 |
|
|
| Boomer187 |
DLP > all others
and if you get a good enough warranty, you dont have to worry about bulb burn outs for a long time. Plus you will never get color fading like you do with lcd.
I have a 56" mitsubishi DLP and it is amazing. :) ima very happy. |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
to the thread starter,
I have been working at Best Buy for a looooooong time (home theater)
and from the 2 that you are about to choose I would have to say go with Samsung.That tv is truly amazing.
LCD: will last about 60,000 hours,very bright,good contrast ratio,and very afortable.The quality of LCD doesnt change by time.barnd I recommend: Samsung,Sharp Aquas,Sony
PLASMA: you will get the best picture quilty,will last about 40-50,000 hours.actually the new generation of plasmas suppose to last 60,000.when it comes to details and sharpness plasma wins again.
downside I would have to say that they are expensive to repair and the quality of the picture could change by time since Plasma is gas and as that the gus runs out the quality could change too.I would recommend names such as Pioneer (best one out there imo) and panasonic or HP
DLP: I like them alot actually,if you have the room for it and dont have a very bright room then go for it,and yes you do have to change the light bulb after 20-30000 hours but thats just how the tv works and once you get new bulbs it becomes a new tv.I love samsungs DLPS alot.
conclusion: with any one of these tvs you should really go with a HD source,analogue connection will look like on all those tvs.
and so get better cables please,it is not a waste of money I assure you that.
Hope this helped some of you out.:) |
|
|
|
|