|
Cloverfield (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Owen M |
| quote: | Originally posted by Sentinal
It wasnt an alien. It was a sea creature of some sort. It came from the Atlantic Ocean. It first attacked an ocean liner from a oil digging rig. The monster was a deep sea creature that was diturbed by a digging in the ocean and followed the boat back to the new york coast line. |
sea creature thats unknown to man...aliens...all the same . |
|
|
| *~LiSa-LoO~* |
| quote: | Originally posted by Sentinal
It wasnt an alien. It was a sea creature of some sort. It came from the Atlantic Ocean. It first attacked an ocean liner from a oil digging rig. The monster was a deep sea creature that was diturbed by a digging in the ocean and followed the boat back to the new york coast line. |
thanks for the spoiler warning :rolleyes: |
|
|
| *~LiSa-LoO~* |
| quote: | Originally posted by exstasie
PS.
Heard on the news that Cloverfield was the #1 grossing movie ever for the month of January making around $41 Million.
Thats freaking amazing considering the cost to produce was probably nothing including majority of the marketing which was online!
Just checked..Production budget was $25 Million.
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=cloverfield.htm |
They probably took a hint from when the Blair Witch Project was made....seems like they mirrored a lot of their ideas. |
|
|
| Sentinal |
| quote: | Originally posted by *~LiSa-LoO~*
thanks for the spoiler warning :rolleyes: |
There is a lot more to the movie beleive me, but actually not tooo much since the damn thing is only 84 minutes long. But seriously, everything I mentioned above I found on a website and not in the movie. They dont tell you a damn thing in the movie about what the monster is or where it came from. I guess that is why there is a part 2. I would watch it again but it is definatly a movie to see in the theaters cause the effects are amazing. |
|
|
| Invasionmix |
| quote: | Originally posted by exstasie
I read it was giant Crab lol
PS.
Heard on the news that Cloverfield was the #1 grossing movie ever for the month of January making around $41 Million.
Thats freaking amazing considering the cost to produce was probably nothing including majority of the marketing which was online!
Just checked..Production budget was $25 Million.
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=cloverfield.htm |
Pfft don't forget about Rambo this Friday.. :P |
|
|
| exstasie |
Just finished watching it.
I honestly didn't think it was that bad. The ending did kinda suck as you wanna more of what happened w/ the whole etc. but a decent movie overall.
Really different then the average movie which is what I liked! |
|
|
| exstasie |
| quote: | Originally posted by *~LiSa-LoO~*
They probably took a hint from when the Blair Witch Project was made....seems like they mirrored a lot of their ideas. |
Yup! Exactly.
The only difference was that the Blair Witch had a production cost of $60,000.00
That's crazy. It grossed over $248,000,000.00 Worldwide! Holy ! Now thats a decent return haha
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id...itchproject.htm |
|
|
| UmmiE |
Blair witch project sucked ass............Big time
Cloverfield is way better. |
|
|
| Shaya007 |
let me take a wild guess: the second part will be directed by micheal Bay at a cost of 60 million green ones!!
lol! |
|
|
| exstasie |
| quote: | Originally posted by Shaya007
let me take a wild guess: the second part will be directed by micheal Bay at a cost of 60 million green ones!!
lol! |
Optimus Prime Vs. the CRAB!! |
|
|
| Chris Allen |
I thought this film was great.
No problems with the hand-held style of filming. Took a bit to get used to but after the initial party sequence at the start, it's no problem.
Nothing like Blair Witch so all comparison's other than "it used a handl-held" are completely irrelevant. This filming was so much smoother than Blair Witch, but that's the difference between camera's.
Glorified Godzilla flick basically, but highly entertaining. Very well done. 8.5/10 |
|
|
|
|
