|
Cloverfield (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| *~LiSa-LoO~* |
| quote: | Originally posted by Sentinal
There is a lot more to the movie beleive me, but actually not tooo much since the damn thing is only 84 minutes long. But seriously, everything I mentioned above I found on a website and not in the movie. They dont tell you a damn thing in the movie about what the monster is or where it came from. I guess that is why there is a part 2. I would watch it again but it is definatly a movie to see in the theaters cause the effects are amazing. |
Well the whole point was speculation as to WHAT the monster was...a lot of talk was that it was going to be another Godzilla movie, which would have been quite exciting. But now thanks to you that hope is shattered. Take note: next time you're going to reveal an integral part of a movie (especially when the hype about the ENTIRE thing was in regards to what the monster was)...put out a spoiler warning :rolleyes: |
|
|
| FunkyCrew |
| i think the author of the thread should have added spoiler warnings in the tittle, as it's bound to happen |
|
|
| Sentinal |
| wow. chill out. watch the movie already. what i posted is a theory. NEVER CONFIRMED. its not a spoiler cause its not in the ing movie, hence i got it from a website. |
|
|
| Owen M |
***spoiler warning***
there isn't a single nipple sighting in this movie. |
|
|
| evil_cookie |
awesome movie!
spoilers ahead!
one of the coolest parts has to be near the end, when they're on the copter and you get a nice bird's-eye view of the monster while the B-2 Stealth Bomber takes care of business! that was sick! although I’m disappointed, I wanted less F-18’s and more F-22 Raptors :disbelief
overall I thought it was really well done, I love the little hatchlings, those things were friggin awesome - esp when they attacked in the subway. speaking of which, the girl that got "infected"...that was friggin wack, did they shoot her or did she explode?
so did they nuke the island at the end or what? and what is this thing that falls into the water after the credits? I DIDN'T SEE ! :whip:
oh and lol @ the camera man - owned. at first I thought it ate the guy. I was like hell yes!
8/10 just because they didn't bring in the F-22's. Raptors would have layed that ****** out! |
|
|
| Sentinal |
| they didnt nuke the island. a nuke would've vapourized the camera and we wouldn't be able to see the movie from that perspective cause the camera wouldve been destroyed. as for the falling from the sky thing. i didnt see that either. |
|
|
| pete242 |
| quote: | Originally posted by exstasie
Just finished watching it.
I honestly didn't think it was that bad. The ending did kinda suck as you wanna more of what happened w/ the whole etc. but a decent movie overall.
Really different then the average movie which is what I liked! |
I tried watching those last frames over and over again, could see somewhat of a splash but the footage not too clear. How was that filmed a month before the events took place? |
|
|
| zokissima |
| Anyone found any good screener torrents? |
|
|
| exstasie |
| quote: | Originally posted by pete242
I tried watching those last frames over and over again, could see somewhat of a splash but the footage not too clear. How was that filmed a month before the events took place? |
Highlight below to read.
Are you talking about the very end when they are on the Ferris Wheel thing?
I don't know if you remember, but Rob (the main guy) was pissed when he found out that they were taping over the tape that was in there. Obviously the tape in there was a video of when he was hanging out with that chick that he went to rescue. The video of the monster took up majority of the video, but was shorter than the entire length, so it taped over everything but the last minute of the video.
But I don't recall there being any splash at the end or something. I will check when I get home.
| quote: | Originally posted by zokissima
Anyone found any good screener torrents? |
Nope, no Screeners. Still only CAMs. This is the best one i've found so far
DETAILS:
===== File Info =====
FileSize : 572M
PlayTime : 01:12:58.11
VideoCount : 1
AudioCount : 1
===== Video Info =====
Video 0# Stream
VideoCodec : XVID
VideoWidth : 600 pixels
VideoHeight : 284 pixels
VideoFrameRate : 29.970fps
VideoFrameCount : 131209
VideoBitRate : 862
===== Audio Info =====
Audio 0# Stream
AudioCodec : MP3
AudioBitRate : 224000
AudioChannels : 2
AudioSampleRate : 48000 |
|
|
| MarkT |
| quote: | Originally posted by nubsauce
yea i heard about people throwing up.... i dont understand how some people would get sick from that :| |
yeah, I don't get that either...
I haven't see this yet, but FINALLY a trailer that gives SOME info without (I assume) showing 3/4 of the movie! |
|
|
| *~LiSa-LoO~* |
| quote: | Originally posted by Sentinal
wow. chill out. watch the movie already. what i posted is a theory. NEVER CONFIRMED. its not a spoiler cause its not in the ing movie, hence i got it from a website. |
Not a spoiler eh? Care to explain this then:
| quote: | Originally posted by Sentinal
at least thats according to a spoiler site. |
|
|
|
| Chris Allen |
| quote: | The Real Camera Behind Cloverfield
For those who've seen the unique monster movie Cloverfield, you know that the story is supposed to have been shot by the aptly-named character "Hud" with a cheapo handheld consumer camera. You know, something you could grab at Best Buy next weekend, use once and forget about forever. Convincing the audience of that point was one of the movie's most successful angles, since much of the film (yes, a few other cameras were used, too) was really shot on Sony's flagship, absolute top of the line CineAlta HD camera the F23
It's a 1080p camera that shoots anywhere from 1P to 60P a second, so 24P shooting (the exact framerate of film) is no problem. As for what it records to...the movie claims the video was captured on an SD card.
That's not quite the case, since such a puny card could never write an uncompressed 4:4:4 (full color space) image in real time. Instead, filmmakers probably used Sony's SRW-1, which can hook directly to the camera to allow both easy shooting and recording speeds of 110MB/sec (versus an SD card's 20MB/sec).
So how much would it cost to score an F23 of your own? Sony hasn't made that number public, but their next camera down runs $115,000. And while we know Cloverfield's main character was a hotshot VP of some sort, he probably didn't invest that much into his Coney Island video* fund. |
Source: Gizmodo |
|
|
|
|
