|
The Bedroom Sessions v 2.0 (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| nchs09 |
| Sticky? why not just bump it like the old one? It wasnt used that often. |
|
|
| tubularbills |
| quote: | Originally posted by nchs09
Sticky? why not just bump it like the old one? It wasnt used that often. |
often enough. kinda like the random talking thread. |
|
|
| Ian |
| quote: | Originally posted by nchs09
Sticky? why not just bump it like the old one? It wasnt used that often. |
don't you have to go laugh at Barca? Shoo puto, shoo :happy2: |
|
|
| RJT |
| quote: | Originally posted by nchs09
Sticky? why not just bump it like the old one? It wasnt used that often. |
What are you talking about? It was used all the time (and further, it's closed now in an effort to create a more comprehensive thread as the last one could no longer be edited).
There's a lot more to it this time and it's basically a free opportunity for any number of DJ's to be able to stream audio - in my mind there's no reason for it NOT to be a sticky.
First post updated with initial information. Let me know what was missed.
:) |
|
|
| Ian |
| nice work rob :) Will have our first bash tomorrow night no doubt. scary to think we've been doing it since late 2002 although then it was a 24kbps stream which we used our own connections as servers :o |
|
|
| RJT |
| quote: | Originally posted by Ian
nice work rob :) Will have our first bash tomorrow night no doubt. scary to think we've been doing it since late 2002 although then it was a 24kbps stream which we used our own connections as servers :o |
Thanks boss :)
To be honest, I had been noodling how to do this in a more effective way for a while, but didn't really get the nerve to take the plunge until Tony asked me if I thought we'd be better served opening another thread that would be a bit more relevant.
I'm hoping that this continues to do as well as it had, and that now that we'll have a bit more organization and a few more options, that even more DJ's than have already jumped on will take the plunge and ahare their tunes with TA. |
|
|
| Ian |
| definitely. We've got some great djs here, and I find the sets of different guys from the boards better than most 'internationally renowned' djs. Plus unlike the thread in md where most people joined to spam it, the ones playing live here are regulars usually from the board, which is much more fun. |
|
|
| nchs09 |
| quote: | Originally posted by RJT
What are you talking about? It was used all the time (and further, it's closed now in an effort to create a more comprehensive thread as the last one could no longer be edited).
There's a lot more to it this time and it's basically a free opportunity for any number of DJ's to be able to stream audio - in my mind there's no reason for it NOT to be a sticky.
First post updated with initial information. Let me know what was missed.
:) |
I guess... i just dont like when the stickys change. |
|
|
| RJT |
| quote: | Originally posted by nchs09
I guess... i just dont like when the stickys change. |
:stongue:
Fair play. |
|
|
| iammesol |
| Well done, Rob. Have fun managing it. :p |
|
|
| RJT |
| quote: | Originally posted by iammesol
Well done, Rob. Have fun managing it. :p |
Lol, yeah - well I'm hoping that once we have a few people who aren't me that are willing to hand out server info when needed, there really won't be much "managing" per se.
Obviously things will change over time and we'll need to adapt the thread to reflect that, but I think there is a much better opportunity of that now if we can get a bit more solid foundation to start from.
We'll see what happens, but I'd like to hope that some of the kinks/mistakes that hampered the first thread were learned from and that those issues will be addressed better this time around.
:) |
|
|
|
|
