return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Local Scene Info / Discussion / EDM Event Listings > USA > USA - Chicago, Detroit & N. Central USA

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 
Delobbo dominating RA interview (pg. 6)
View this Thread in Original format
Omega_Blue
did this just become a vinyl vs. cd discussion?

digital sounds better and i always find it funny when people say they like the sound of vinyl because of it's "warmth" or "color." somebody please explain to me what "warm and colorful" sounds like. it's just a case of nostalgia imo. vinyl to me sounds slightly muffled and a little mid-heavy. it feels like i have to crank the hi-eq knob to get anywhere near the crispness of a well mastered digital recording. meh, maybe my carts suck though i guess.
delobbo
quote:
Originally posted by Omega_Blue
did this just become a vinyl vs. cd discussion?

digital sounds better and i always find it funny when people say they like the sound of vinyl because of it's "warmth" or "color." somebody please explain to me what "warm and colorful" sounds like. it's just a case of nostalgia imo. vinyl to me sounds slightly muffled and a little mid-heavy. it feels like i have to crank the hi-eq knob to get anywhere near the crispness of a well mastered digital recording. meh, maybe my carts suck though i guess.

it also (obviously) depends on what you're listening to.
Blake_Jarrell
quote:
Originally posted by tolgar
Without getting into my own personal tastes.... I wouldn't call the sample rate of cd "precise, pristine quality"... unless we're talking about SACD with a 2.8 MHz sample rate...and even those can have issues. Taste is certainly subjective...but mathematically it's hard to not discuss aliasing and other data junk. I also think that in cases where the Nyquist criteria has to be lowered to accommodate for fundamental frequencies, you have issues unless alias-protected decimation is used...and that's not always the case. The bottom line...they both have their issues... cost really becomes a factor as to why one medium is more popular than another. The average consumers' ears aren't trained to hear sonic difference, but they are trained to follow clever marketing techniques (props to Sony in the 70's).

With that said, I use cds because they are cheap, easy to use, easy to carry, and convenient in many ways...but at home, nothing beats putting on a 1934 RCA pressing of Beethoven or Mozart and kicking back into la la land.


DiFazio @ Columbia would like to have a word with you.
m. sylvia
quote:
Originally posted by delobbo
btw.. in the unlikely or likely event you haven't already seen the recent Chicago pics I posted in COR.. clicky:

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...0&forumid=16&s=

:clown:


dag that's nice
lücid
quote:
Originally posted by Omega_Blue
somebody please explain to me what "warm and colorful" sounds like.

like baby sheeps being led by a unicorn to graze in a field showered by sunshine.
Omega_Blue
quote:
Originally posted by lücid
like baby sheeps being led by a unicorn to graze in a field showered by sunshine.


is "sheeps" plural for "sheep"? :conf:
lücid
quote:
Originally posted by Omega_Blue
is "sheeps" plural for "sheep"? :conf:

duh.
delobbo
lucid how is your flock of seafulls
Ben Brown
digital sounds warmer to me
neutron liar
we should have this battle royal, with one side chucking vinyl at the other who's chucking cds at them.

See who wins. Fight to the Death for the right to claim one media better than the other!

Aquadyne
hay wats goin on here
lücid
quote:
Originally posted by neutron liar
we should have this battle royal, with one side chucking vinyl at the other who's chucking cds at them.

See who wins. Fight to the Death for the right to claim one media better than the other!

Sasha wins.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 
Privacy Statement