|
Pro producers that use FL studio (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| echosystm |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vitamin-DLW
People seem to hate on it for being too straight forward |
or because it lacks so many important features ;) |
|
|
| Vitamin-DLW |
| quote: | Originally posted by echosystm
or because it lacks so many important features ;) |
name them. |
|
|
| pwnage1 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vitamin-DLW
name them. |
PDC. Multi core support. thats all i know off the top of my head but these are so important for production nowadays. |
|
|
| Vitamin-DLW |
| quote: | Originally posted by pwnage1
PDC. Multi core support. thats all i know off the top of my head but these are so important for production nowadays. |
those haven't been an issue for me... |
|
|
| pwnage1 |
| quote: | | People seem to hate on it for being too straight forward |
| quote: | | or because it lacks so many important features |
| quote: | | those haven't been an issue for me... |
People: (plural) any group of human beings. Well, it has not been an issue for you but for other people it has. The people that hate it probably do have those problems. Not because the GUI is to good. |
|
|
| Watts |
| I really wish I could get it to output and take in SysEx. |
|
|
| paulc_dj |
| quote: | Originally posted by Ry Thomas
Ditto, jumped ship a few months back, these little gripes really piss you off |
Wot did u jump ship to Ry?
I am currently an FL8 user, but am getting constantly pissed off with the CPU load and I'm running a Quad Core with 4GB of RAM. Am thinking about Cubase, not really feeling live as a full production tool, prob get flamed for that, but hey. Asked about Multi-Core support on the FL forum and was told that when 64 bit Delphi comes out (next year). that they would look at it then. Have been a fruity user for prob the best part of 5/6 years. I understand that there's a stigma attached to Fruity as compared to the Others, but I don't care TBH. My mate who lives down the road, has had releases and done remixes for Ministry of Sound, Nebula and others, his names Karl G BTW, and he did a remix for Tiesto (In the Dark) and hes been a fruity user for prob 8 years. I Just really wish they would listen to their users and sort these lingering issues out.
PC |
|
|
| pqpedroland |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vitamin-DLW
those haven't been an issue for me... |
Native sidechaining is another issue which is a pain in the ass for me, also no proper Multi-core support neither PDC. The 64 channel mixer is also limiting, I tend to use some more sometimes...
The GUI is a bit ugly but thats not so important and is a matter of preference. |
|
|
| Ry Thomas |
| quote: | Originally posted by paulc_dj
Wot did u jump ship to Ry?
I am currently an FL8 user, but am getting constantly pissed off with the CPU load and I'm running a Quad Core with 4GB of RAM. Am thinking about Cubase, not really feeling live as a full production tool, prob get flamed for that, but hey. Asked about Multi-Core support on the FL forum and was told that when 64 bit Delphi comes out (next year). that they would look at it then. Have been a fruity user for prob the best part of 5/6 years. I understand that there's a stigma attached to Fruity as compared to the Others, but I don't care TBH. My mate who lives down the road, has had releases and done remixes for Ministry of Sound, Nebula and others, his names Karl G BTW, and he did a remix for Tiesto (In the Dark) and hes been a fruity user for prob 8 years. I Just really wish they would listen to their users and sort these lingering issues out.
PC |
Well a few years back i started getting right into hardware(synths, fx, UAD cards etc). All of those have a delay(audio to leave soundcard, into hardware and back to soundcard), in programmes like Cubase you wouldnt notice this because it is done automatically. In FL you have to manually setup your mixer with PDC - this was my first gripe.
I am running a fairly fast computer C2Duo E6700, 4gb ram etc etc, FL only supports multi core processing for generators only which i think is crap. I use pretty cpu intensive fx so this almost maxed my comp out.
FL's mixer is set up really poor if you are a hardware fx user imo
I found it to be quite buggy and glitchy/unstable too
After trying Cubase 4 i've never looked back, my CPU never goes over 40%, my hardware works seamlessly and never had a hiccup yet *touch wood*. The mixer routing is amazing and it is just generally 100x better for me |
|
|
| evo8 |
| quote: | Originally posted by pqpedroland
The 64 channel mixer is also limiting, I tend to use some more sometimes...
|
:eyes: |
|
|
| Beyer |
| quote: | Originally posted by evo8
:eyes: |
+1 whaaaat... |
|
|
| Ry Thomas |
| quote: | Originally posted by Watts
I really wish I could get it to output and take in SysEx. |
I believe FL8 does just this |
|
|
|
|
