|
Reason 5 (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| derail |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vizay
I'd like to see Dr.Rex 2, a device able to handle loops in a more extensive way. |
I'd like to see a multitrack Dr Rex device. So you could use the full loops as is the situation currently, or you can take parts out/ put other parts in. Yes, I'm aware that turns it into a mini sequencer which could be achieved by using the main sequencer, except it would still allow you to import whole loops/ full sets of sounds, in one easy step, all synced to tempo.
A detailed frequency analyser, as someone else said.
I'd very much hope the next version makes use of multicore CPUs. |
|
|
| Reno |
I know incorporating Recycle has been mentioned but how about combining Recycle with Dr Rex? Don't know how others use these devices but I only ever convert a wav loop to rex format and then use Dr Rex to play it. If I could do all of that from Dr Rex then brilliant.
Also on the whole vst question, Reason will never introduce vst support as it defeats the entire purpose of the product and as has been mentioned, would be a nightmare with the whole routing flexibility. How about this though...it's own vst type format so that vendors can develop devices purely for Reason that would adhere to Reason best practise, routing principles etc. Imagine if in Thor you could select a 3rd party filter from the drop down or just add a 3rd party device with all the same routing flexibility etc? You wouldn't need to rewire and an entirely new market would be introduced which I'm sure would leave vendors licking their lips and defo make Reason more marketable.
Unfortunately my Virus TI wouldn't be much use though :( |
|
|
| icecooper |
| i personaly use Reason for THOr synth in my fl studio |
|
|
| derail |
| quote: | Originally posted by Reno
Imagine if in Thor you could select a 3rd party filter from the drop down or just add a 3rd party device with all the same routing flexibility etc? |
This would be great to see. It'd make collabing on a reason project difficult (unless everyone buys the same synths), but nowadays many people use heaps of refills anyway, many of which can't be self-contained with the song, so the days of everyone being able to share their reason songs are already gone. |
|
|
| palm |
| most of you want multicore support. i dont get it, ive never maxed out a track on my new computer, not even close. how are u guys making your tracks? |
|
|
| derail |
Different people have different working methods. It's good that your method doesn't use much CPU. Others have methods which use more CPU. In the end, it's how the song sounds.
I have no CPU issues personally, I'm still on a single core Pentium 4 chip, but I'm running Cubase and using primarily hardware.
A number of other DAW manufacturers have enabled their programs to make use of multiple cores. It'd be odd if Propellerheads didn't do this with Reason. |
|
|
| Existo22 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Existo22
I don't think audio recording will ever be a possibility with reason.
That would make it an inferior cubase.
The only thing they could consider doing is spending some serious time creating a new mixer module modeled of the ssl 4048 console with build in eq and compression on each channel.
It should also visually look like that and we want the sequencer window to be resized to accommodate it.
That would really lift the program increase sales and help propelerheads make more money. |
Wow I said it back then and they did it now!
This is for all you non believers out there who think my advise is garbage! ;)
Finally for **** sake a mixer that looks like a f*****n mixer. They are going to make miiiiiiiiiiiiiiilllions! |
|
|
| Fledz |
| Well done. Have a cookie. |
|
|
| palm |
| quote: | Originally posted by Existo22
Wow I said it back then and they did it now!
This is for all you non believers out there who think my advise is garbage! ;)
Finally for **** sake a mixer that looks like a f*****n mixer. They are going to make miiiiiiiiiiiiiiilllions! |
i bet u edited your old post, i dont remember reading that. |
|
|
| Existo22 |
| quote: | Originally posted by palm
i bet u edited your old post, i don't remember reading that. |
Fair enough.
This is a step by step guide to show people how full of you are.
Step One:
Go at the long 20 page tips thread you ve posted
Step Two:
What Does it say at the bottom of the page?
Last edited by Existo22 on May-15-2009 at 12:27
Why? I added the Gabriel Interview.
Step Three:
Go find my post on this thread.
If I had edited my post f*****R it would say:
LAST EDITED BY EXISTO AT THIS DATE AT THIS TIME.
It doesn't say that now does it fu**er?
Bow down and shut up before you embarrass yourself again boy.
You are way out your league. ;) |
|
|
| palm |
u know u can hide edits right? lol
edit: ive edited this post two times now
edit: now three times, still no edit date in the bottom? or are u seeing it? maybe its disabled in my view only i dont know. |
|
|
| Existo22 |
| quote: | Originally posted by palm
u know u can hide edits right? lol
edit: ive edited this post two times now |
NO. YOU. CAN. NOT.
Go ahead and show me how.
Go ahead!
Don't worry! I'll wait!
Show how and I will edit my last post to say that you are stuck so far up your ass that you would rather make up some bull story about how I edited my post than admit that I saw this coming before you did.
Then I will ''hide the edit.''
LOL.
You are reaching man you really are. |
|
|
|
|
