|
This is how to talk to Iran (pg. 5)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by Magnetonium
Iran is just trying too dam hard to obtain nuclear technology - apparently the fact that the Russian company is building the Busher nuclear power plant is not enough. Attempts such as the one below can only bring up uncomfortable questions, and expose the true nature of Iranian alleged peaceful nuclear energy goals.
|
Iran has the right to nuclear technology. |
|
|
| yukii |
| quote: | Originally posted by Krypton
Iran has the right to nuclear technology. |
exactly. why should the US always have their nose up everyone's ass telling them you can/can't do this or that? its fkn annoying & that's why so many countries have felt annoyed..
hell, let them do what they please bc they have the right as a country. if they decide to launch on the other hand, we'll at least we know we're more than ready to take care of it :p |
|
|
| Magnetonium |
| quote: | Originally posted by LazFX
SOURCE |
You need to see the video of it. People are clapping, and dozens of delegates are leaving the hall. Also, at the beginning, couple protesters interrupt smiling Ahmadinejad, obviously people concerned with gay rights in Iran. You can view it here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8008572.stm
Ahmadinejad blames Jews for everything, doesn't he? Jews didn't just immigrate to Israel, they were SENT by the orders of the Zionists themselves, to colonize the Palestinian lands! :stongue:
At the same time, Iran has internal racism issues of its own - anti-Arab discrimination (how ironic!). Yet, for some reason, it stretches its hand to support Palestinians.
|
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| quote: | Originally posted by Krypton
Iran has the right to nuclear technology. |
Why's that? What rights do nations have inherently reserved for them? Since when? |
|
|
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
Why's that? What rights do nations have inherently reserved for them? Since when? |
Article 3 of the non-proliferation treaty. |
|
|
| Q5echo |
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
Why's that? What rights do nations have inherently reserved for them? |
like Krypton said, the rights they volutarily take on themselves and agree to defend and abide by.
as recently as 1995 |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by yukii
exactly. why should the US always have their nose up everyone's ass telling them you can/can't do this or that? its fkn annoying & that's why so many countries have felt annoyed..
hell, let them do what they please bc they have the right as a country. if they decide to launch on the other hand, we'll at least we know we're more than ready to take care of it :p |
Oh great. You're going to continue krypton's habit of making idiotic sweeping statements that hold little resemblance to reality.
Iran is a signatory to the non proliferation treaty. Go look it up. |
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| Inherently. |
|
|
| jerZ07002 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Krypton
Article 3 of the non-proliferation treaty. |
have you actually read article 3 of the NPT (reproduced below for your reading pleasure)? Iran does not have the right to produce nuclear technology for non-peaceful purposes. Article 3 clearly states that a non-nuclear-weapon state must submit to IAES safeguards to prevent the nuclear technology from being diverted for non-peaceful purposes. Moreover, as far as I'm aware, Iran has been extremely uncooperative with the IAEA for quite some time. From 2006: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11105378/. You don't need a lawyer to write a memo explaining that Iran is in violation of the NPT; it's pretty obvious!
| quote: |
Article III
1. Each non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes to accept safeguards, as set forth in an agreement to be negotiated and concluded with the International Atomic Energy Agency in accordance with the Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency and the Agency’s safeguards system, for the exclusive purpose of verification of the fulfillment of its obligations assumed under this Treaty with a view to preventing diversion of nuclear energy from peaceful uses to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices. Procedures for the safeguards required by this Article shall be followed with respect to source or special fissionable material whether it is being produced, processed or used in any principal nuclear facility or is outside any such facility. The safeguards required by this Article shall be applied on all source or special fissionable material in all peaceful nuclear activities within the territory of such State, under its jurisdiction, or carried out under its control anywhere |
|
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
| quote: | Originally posted by Krypton
Iran has the right to nuclear technology. |
like any other god damn country on this earth. the double standards. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by hardcore trancer
like any other god damn country on this earth. the double standards. |
if the US was a repressive theocracy then it might be a double-standard. |
|
|
| yukii |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
Oh great. You're going to continue krypton's habit of making idiotic sweeping statements that hold little resemblance to reality.
Iran is a signatory to the non proliferation treaty. Go look it up. |
lol- you know how i do ;) me & krpt think alike.
i know iran is a signatory to the NNPT along with n korea n such but thats my point.. who are we to say who can & can't have nuclear weapons? like that guy above me said, isn't that double standards?
how would it look if n korea tried pulling the NNPT on the US lol.. looks ridiculous.. i mean- pkc i dont have anything against you- but i just don't see why we have to make it our buisness. |
|
|
|
|
