|
Social networks the CIA and data mining (pg. 6)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| iTranscendence |
| quote: | Originally posted by Arbiter
Doubtful. Under California v. Greenwood the authorities can sift through your garbage once it's outside of your home and that's not a search.
Since social networking sites are basically electronic garbage and they're not inside your home, it follows that they can search them too. :gsmile: |
Many rulings are not going to be congruent with the electronic age and the expansion of it into every aspect of our lives. |
|
|
| iTranscendence |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
Here, I got you something:
 |
Here, I got you something
 |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
| quote: | Originally posted by iTranscendence
UGH. We need a supreme court ruling putting data mining under the reigns of the 4th amendment.
What about if your profile is private and they still mine the data anyway? |
I think it's safe to say you've never read the fine print before you clicked "I Agree" and signed up to Facebook.
For the record, I've never claimed it's "okay" for governments to be hypocrites and to break their own rules. However it happens. It's always happened. It always will happen. In cases like this, it's utterly insignificant and has no practical influence on your life. And no, it isn't the start of an Orwellian dystopia. It's a pathetic thing to complain about, and you don't care about it because of your principles. You care because you take drugs. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| quote: | Originally posted by iTranscendence
Here, I got you something
|
Oh thanks! Now I don't have to explain to your mother how I lost hers! :gsmile: |
|
|
| Arbiter |
If one of your friends accesses your profile on a computer in a public library, for example, then even after they log off your profile information will no doubt be stored in that computer's internet browser cache for some period of time. Can you really have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of a third party public library's computer's browser cache?
I mean, I'm generally in favor of stronger 4th amendment protection that we currently have, but I think that would be going too far. |
|
|
| Slylee |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
And you are extremely consistent and developed in your inanity and stupidity. But whenever someone points that out, they've got you wrong or your online self isn't an accurate persona.
I'm pointing out your basic hypocrisies. You change your standards and thinking to suit you in any given moment.
|
lol get ed |
|
|
| Slylee |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
Here, I got you something:
|
bahahahah where did you get that? i have that on my photobucket account. i forgot where i got it from. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| Lol I just Googled 'tinfoil hat'. :tongue2 |
|
|
| iTranscendence |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
Oh thanks! Now I don't have to explain to your mother how I lost hers! :gsmile: |
That clown pocket eats objects like in pacman.
:p
wakka wakka wakka wakka |
|
|
| iTranscendence |
| quote: | Originally posted by Arbiter
If one of your friends accesses your profile on a computer in a public library, for example, then even after they log off your profile information will no doubt be stored in that computer's internet browser cache for some period of time. Can you really have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of a third party public library's computer's browser cache?
I mean, I'm generally in favor of stronger 4th amendment protection that we currently have, but I think that would be going too far. |
Which is exactly why I think we need to reassess the 4th amendment in context of the new digital world. |
|
|
|
|
