|
Norway cuts antibiotics, successfully battles staph (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by gehzumteufel
lol that doesn't even have to do with corporate-personhood. |
Its exactly the same principle. |
|
|
| gehzumteufel |
| quote: | Originally posted by Sushipunk
Thanks :) |
Np. I didn't realise I didn't have it originally. |
|
|
| gehzumteufel |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
Its exactly the same principle. |
How? A corporation takes liability. That doesn't change without corporate-personhood. All it does is remove the constitutional provisions (the ones that guarantee a human, the ability of free speech, campaign donations, etc here in the U.S.) that have been allowed to them. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by gehzumteufel
How? A corporation takes liability. That doesn't change without corporate-personhood. All it does is remove the constitutional provisions (the ones that guarantee a human, the ability of free speech, campaign donations, etc here in the U.S.) that have been allowed to them. |
I meant that my quote applied to corporations as well as to government which the poster was talking about. As for how things would change without corporate-personhood, ask arbiter. I don’t know. |
|
|
| gehzumteufel |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
I meant that my quote applied to corporations as well as to government which the poster was talking about. As for how things would change without corporate-personhood, ask arbiter. I don’t know. |
Well you are wholly misinformed. The reason the U.S. has problems with campaign finance, is directly related to corporate-personhood. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by gehzumteufel
Well you are wholly misinformed. The reason the U.S. has problems with campaign finance, is directly related to corporate-personhood. |
Wait, what? I think we’re confused. Or maybe its just me. yes, I know that corporate personhood is directly related to the recent SC decision on campaign financing. I was pointing out originally that there are other reasons for personhood, such as directing liability. And then I said I don’t know how that (liability) might change if personhood was denied to corporations. |
|
|
| gehzumteufel |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
Wait, what? I think we’re confused. Or maybe its just me. yes, I know that corporate personhood is directly related to the recent SC decision on campaign financing. I was pointing out originally that there are other reasons for personhood, such as directing liability. And then I said I don’t know how that (liability) might change if personhood was denied to corporations. |
It wouldn't. A corporation, whether it is viewed as a person or not, is still liable for a faulty product. Plain and simple. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by gehzumteufel
It wouldn't. A corporation, whether it is viewed as a person or not, is still liable for a faulty product. Plain and simple. |
well, its not so much a question of liability as it is directing that liability. but again, im a complete noob on the topic. |
|
|
| netroM |
I've been sick (slights coughs, sore throat and runny nose do not count) for about five or six weeks, maximum, in my entire life (22 years).
And if I first get sick, I get better within 3-4 days. If I'm not better by then I'll go see my doctor. |
|
|
| tubularbills |
| all i know is that when i have a sinus infection; i'm givin pills. and 7-10 days later i'm better. |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
| This is why I don't pop pills to solve problems. They're a chemical crutch. |
|
|
| gehzumteufel |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
This is why I don't pop pills to solve problems. They're a chemical crutch. |
This. I can't remember the last time I went to the doctor. lol |
|
|
|
|
