|
Amanda Knox is INNOCENT! Italy SUCKS. (pg. 9)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| igottaknow |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
You presume too much; read all the facts relating to the story and you'll find that the way she acted directly after the murder fits with her actions prior to the death ( and don't forget it's the death of her roommate in her apartment).
In other words these are not the randmom isolated strange actions of someone maybe not acting appropriately after the death of someone they knew. The bitch got off on it, and she didn't realise she was being filmed passionatley tongueing her boyfriend directly after the death of the person she shared her home with.
I'm not basing my opinion on just how she acted right after the discovery of the death - but that all her actions fit together as someone who at least helped set it up, if not actively participated.
Don't get me wrong, I think the court and trial was all over the place but just based on the evidence I've seen (which is a fair amount) Knox is not innocent. Her account of events simply does not match the evidence and she had both motive and opportunity. |
If I recall she also changed her story a few times and chalked it up to being scared. She seems to be getting the benefit of the doubt based on her looks. If she looked and talked like Washley no one would be rushing to her defense. And then you got Nou jerking off in his Aunts basement moaning Ali. All and all quite laughable. |
|
|
| DJ RANN |
| quote: | Originally posted by leph555
Are we all playing Sherlock now? |
Not at all. The bitch was presumed innocent, has been proven guilty and and she's in jail. Case closed.
@Tranceporter99 - you miss the point that her account of events does not match the copious amounts of physical evidence. In fact her story does not make any sense and she herself has never been able to explain away the holes in her story. |
|
|
| idoru |
| quote: | Originally posted by igottaknow
She seems to be getting the benefit of the doubt based on her looks. |
And, in Nou's case, her connection to Washington state. |
|
|
| Joss Weatherby |
| quote: | Originally posted by igottaknow
If I recall she also changed her story a few times and chalked it up to being scared. She seems to be getting the benefit of the doubt based on her looks. If she looked and talked like Washley no one would be rushing to her defense. And then you got Nou jerking off in his Aunts basement moaning Ali. All and all quite laughable. |
What is an Ali? The boxer? :conf: |
|
|
| igottaknow |
| I'll give you she does look cute. |
|
|
| Tranceporter99 |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
Not at all. The bitch was presumed innocent, has been proven guilty and and she's in jail. Case closed.
@Tranceporter99 - you miss the point that her account of events does not match the copious amounts of physical evidence. In fact her story does not make any sense and she herself has never been able to explain away the holes in her story. |
Through all of my reading and watching of the case, I didn't see "copious" amounts of physical evidence. A knife that allegedly has Knox's DNA materioal is of dubious legitimacy. Thats all the physical evidence I have seen. Plus, the documented (I have seen the crime scene investigation video) blundering of the crime scene leaves any "copious" amount of physical evidence in jeopardy of being admissable at all.
As far as her accounts are concerned, this is definitely the most damning of all evidence against her. In fact, I wonder had she stuck to a unified story, would she have even reached trial at all. But even those blunders on her part are put into question with the admitted (by the Italian police) of the marathon questioning and questionable interrogation tactics. |
|
|
| MeLLyMeL |
alot of her acting cooky was highly exaggerated by the news media in Italy. Yes there was footage of her kissing her BOYFRIEND after her roomate passed away. I don't see the harm in that. Also, I saw more pop kissing than full on making out. God forbid :eek:
There is a 'supposed' murder weapon - which is a fuking knife that everyone in the house could have used. Ever cut bread before??
She was never 'innocent until proven guilty'. She was guilty from the get go. If there is no fuking evidence actually linking you to the crime - then no matter what... even if she DID do it. She should not be in jail. |
|
|
| igottaknow |
| quote: | Originally posted by MeLLyMeL
alot of her acting cooky was highly exaggerated by the news media in Italy. Yes there was footage of her kissing her BOYFRIEND after her roomate passed away. I don't see the harm in that. Also, I saw more pop kissing than full on making out. God forbid :eek: |
if there was tongue she should get an extra 5 years. :p |
|
|
| DJ RANN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Tranceporter99
Through all of my reading and watching of the case, I didn't see "copious" amounts of physical evidence. A knife that allegedly has Knox's DNA materioal is of dubious legitimacy. Thats all the physical evidence I have seen. Plus, the documented (I have seen the crime scene investigation video) blundering of the crime scene leaves any "copious" amount of physical evidence in jeopardy of being admissable at all.
As far as her accounts are concerned, this is definitely the most damning of all evidence against her. In fact, I wonder had she stuck to a unified story, would she have even reached trial at all. But even those blunders on her part are put into question with the admitted (by the Italian police) of the marathon questioning and questionable interrogation tactics. |
I totally agree that the CSI's were , but in terms of evidence there's the cell phone(s) and their magic switching on and off around the murder period which no one can explain, Knox's DNA on the murder weapon, the computer evidence, the way the body was left (indicated it was done by someone who knew her personally) and her actions both pre and prior to the murder.
Don't get me wrong, there's a lot of flaws in the case and it would have probably been thrown out due to technicalities in the US, but the one armed man didn't do this. She had means, motive, opportunity, no alibi and a very strange and changing account of what happened that night. The italians don't about and they didn't let her get off due to evidence collection technicalities.
The most damning thing, as you say is her own story. It doesn't matter how weird or aggressive an interrogation is (aside from maybe torture which she certainly wasn't subjected to), you just don't change your account of events that drastically or more than three times. You just tell the truth if you didn't do it and stick to that version regardless of what the cops are shouting at you. And you don't change it as the trial goes on.
And yes, I've seen the footage, she is full on necking with him in front of police after the body is discovered. She got off on it.
And no, I've never cut myself while cutting bread. Ever. Cutting up meat? yes, but not bread ;) |
|
|
| Arbiter |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
The most damning thing, as you say is her own story. It doesn't matter how weird or aggressive an interrogation is (aside from maybe torture which she certainly wasn't subjected to), you just don't change your account of events that drastically or more than three times. You just tell the truth if you didn't do it and stick to that version regardless of what the cops are shouting at you. And you don't change it as the trial goes on. |
That's what we thought before DNA evidence overturned dozens of convictions based on that logic. Now, we know better.
Or at least we should. |
|
|
| Joss Weatherby |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
the way the body was left (indicated it was done by someone who knew her personally) ... She had means, motive ..
doesn't matter how weird or aggressive an interrogation is .. you just don't change your account of events that drastically or more than three times. You just tell the truth if you didn't do it |
YOU ARE STRAIGHT UP STUPID. |
|
|
| DJ RANN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
YOU ARE STRAIGHT UP STUPID. |
Yeah? well, your Dad's car sucks!
C'mon now.
You're smarter than that Joss.
And yes, DNA has overturned dozens of cases: Ones where DNA hadn't been used in the first place, sadly not where DNA from the prime suspect had already been found on the murder weapon.
Look I actually don't think she did it, but I think she set it up, and aws ahppy when it was done.
Nothing in her behaviour suggests otherwise to me. I'm not asking you to agree, just my opinion having followed the trial. |
|
|
|
|
