|
An observation about all the longtime posters on here (pg. 7)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| RebeL9 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Trance-MB
Someone mentioned high horses? |
Or unicorns.
Sorry I just couldn't resist :( |
|
|
| LAdazeNYnights |
| quote: | Originally posted by srussell0018
Saying "This track is an abomination to music" isn't really an argument either. I'm sure people in here who haven't been listening to trance for as long as others haven't been exposed to what you think is "good music." You talk about people "learning a thing or two," but if someone likes a track, and get torched, what exactly are they learning? Yeah, the "this track is horrible, try this" would be ideal, but I think what some of the people in this thread have said, i.e. "the elitist mentality" does hold some weight here.
People are quick to judge (usually harshly) others tastes in music, but I'm sure all of them were in the same boat previously. There must have been loads of people mocking their tastes in music when they first got into "the scene." I think the point people are missing is that it's not people being sensitive or "butt-hurt" by people's flames, but rather the frustration of the lack of actual discussion. If you don't like a song, say so, but don't attack a PERSON for liking it. Music makes different people feel different ways, and that's the beauty of it. Who are you to judge the listener for enjoying a track, simply because you do not?
Essentially it all boils down to the forum title. It's Music Discussion, not open musical taste court. People aren't posting a song they like in order to be judged by a jury of their peers as much as they're posting something to TRY and "learn a thing or two." If you think you have better taste in music, or the artists/songs you listen to are of better quality, maybe you should suggest some of it to them.
I just think the Music Discussion forum should be more about people discussing the music they like in a more constructive way. Be as brutal as you want in your opinion of the song, but leave the OP out of it. If you really get more pleasure out of bashing someone, than you would about helping to broaden their taste, that's really sad. |
Thank you. People are getting caught up in the Trance vs. Tech/Deep idea here - thinking that the problem arises from tastes having moved on and others still enjoying trance. I don't think that's quite the issue. I like trance, though I haven't been as exposed to it as many on here have been. I also love deep house - I've become quite passionate about it - but, again, I haven't been nearly as exposed to it as many on here have.
Distant keeps falling back on "maybe you could learn a thing or two" without recognizing that the desire to learn is exactly what I'm advocating here. He mentioned "alienating the teacher" when it is absolutely the other way around.
When that whole trancetop1000 site was first announced, I made a thread about it in here and eventually shared the top 10 that I submitted. Being a bit newer to trance but still knowing a bit about it, I recognized that some of the songs I chose would be understood and others would be flamed immensely but they were all tracks that, both at shows and in my bedroom, did incredible things to me. The best part about that thread for me was discovering tracks by artists I had never heard of that people considered to be top quality. |
|
|
| Teezdalien |
| quote: | Originally posted by distant
and conversely, it doesn't mean I or anyone thinks they are a "better person" than anybody else. new people are so quick to come up with explanations laden with connotation for why forum veterans behave the way they do. we simply know more than you do. get over it. if you can do that, maybe you can learn a thing or two. |
Just a question for you and I mean no disrespect, but exactly how do you equate being a forum veteran here to having superior musical knowledge. I know in some instances you are probably right, but that's really a wild and arrogant assumption, no? |
|
|
| FuzzQi |
I come here for two things:
-talk about music with others
-get exposure to new music
Good on the long-timers for providing these  |
|
|
| Trance-MB |
| quote: | Originally posted by RebeL9
Or unicorns. |
Supreme horses :) |
|
|
| distant |
| quote: | Originally posted by Teezdalien
Just a question for you and I mean no disrespect, but exactly how do you equate being a forum veteran here to having superior musical knowledge. |
I don't, although there is some correlation. in any case, it should be fairly apparent when someone is completely clueless from the way they post. |
|
|
| noikeee |
| quote: | Originally posted by Trance-MB
Yeah I would like YOU folks that think you are more than a newbie to add a few words with every post you do and just show some decency and not implying to present a fact. |
But we get tired of doing it all the ing time. It's a matter of patience, being bombarded every day with silly is there a way to avoid becoming jaded about it?
Personally I just try to stay away from threads that do not interest me, but some people have trouble doing that.
| quote: | | I always thought that US older ones should try to be a good example to younger ones. I must be really old for thinking this.... |
I was not aware this place was a training school for good etiquette.
| quote: | What a total lame excuse. Who told you to be the one who knows what actually is better music?
To me it sound like you really earned the title to be an Elite.
Someone mentioned high horses? |
Look, I have no problem admitting that there is always some degree of subjectivity about music, and that there are many many people here who are more knowledgeable about me. This isn't about being superior to others. However there's gotta be a limit somewhere on where to take someone seriously or not, surely? If some noob pops up raving about Ke$ha and Justin Bieber as the gods of music, would you waste time arguing with that person for real in any musical debate?
I'm sorry if you feel left out for not everyone valuing your opinions, but that's just the way it is. |
|
|
| MrJiveBoJingles |
Lately I'm trying to post by the rule of, "Ignore the bad, promote the good." So if someone posts about a track I think is awful, I usually ignore it rather than flaming it, posting a long critique of it, or getting into a big argument about it.
I used to find a sort of perverse fun in being negative about the music I disliked and really laying into it, but now it seems tiresome. I don't want to use up my energy dealing with crap, even if it's to try and "convert" people away from it by telling them precisely why I think it's crap. There's too much good music out there that deserves my time and attention for that. |
|
|
| Trance-MB |
| quote: | Originally posted by noikeee
But we get tired of doing it all the ing time. It's a matter of patience, being bombarded every day with silly is there a way to avoid becoming jaded about it?
Personally I just try to stay away from threads that do not interest me, but some people have trouble doing that.
|
Well, if youīre that tired of doing it just donīt reply at all. Others wonīt know you reached that point so they will think thatīs the normal way of replying.
| quote: |
I was not aware this place was a training school for good etiquette.
|
For some people this place isnīt reality and act differently than in real life.
I think older ones should try to be an example everywhere.
I used ītryī as of course some fun and also some flaming is okay.
| quote: |
Look, I have no problem admitting that there is always some degree of subjectivity about music, and that there are many many people here who are more knowledgeable about me. This isn't about being superior to others. However there's gotta be a limit somewhere on where to take someone seriously or not, surely? If some noob pops up raving about Ke$ha and Justin Bieber as the gods of music, would you waste time arguing with that person for real in any musical debate?
I'm sorry if you feel left out for not everyone valuing your opinions, but that's just the way it is. |
Yes, there is a limit, but for some that limit already is reached if only one of the words Armin, Tiesto, A.S.O.T., uplifting, anthem, supersaw or minimal is mentioned in the OP.
No I wouldnīt argue, but if I felt the need to reply at all I would still do it in a polite way. Also in the late 80īs, early 90īs a lot of EDM got flamed. The same stuff now is called quality. If someone is raving about an artist at least this means that artist is bringing him or her a lot of joy, and I still think thatīs the most important thing about music. Quality and all technical stuff behind it IMO is less important.
I donīt expect anyone to value my opinion actually, but that wonīt stop me sharing it. Sometimes itīs good to show there is a lot of grey between black and white. |
|
|
| Swamper |
Nice to see some REAL replies in this thread
(keep it up!) |
|
|
| epicaricacy |
| this forum is starting to feel like apartheid. |
|
|
| Lews |
| quote: | Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Lately I'm trying to post by the rule of, "Ignore the bad, promote the good." So if someone posts about a track I think is awful, I usually ignore it rather than flaming it, posting a long critique of it, or getting into a big argument about it.
I used to find a sort of perverse fun in being negative about the music I disliked and really laying into it, but now it seems tiresome. I don't want to use up my energy dealing with crap, even if it's to try and "convert" people away from it by telling them precisely why I think it's crap. There's too much good music out there that deserves my time and attention for that. |
I've been trying to keep that attitude going myself, lately :) |
|
|
|
|
