|
LOL Florida... (pg. 5)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Desiderata |
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
I'm not saying Obama lacks intelligence by any means... but he sure as isn't Carl Sagan like most of his devoted followers like to think. |
Well, I hear even the black people are mad at Obama and questioning him because they all thought they would have white slaves by now. |
|
|
| Desiderata |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moongoose
Sig seems so appropriate in here. |
lmaO... I was looking for your sig on this. :haha:
On a lighter note.
William Burroughs wrote a book called 'Junky' and if I am not mistaken (it's been years since I read it) he talks about his Heroin addiction really graphic and his nights and fetishes with 13 year old boys and I'm sure that book is still in print and can be found almost anywhere (offline and online) But the book was NOT all about sex with underage boys, just some parts and I have no idea what book Nou is talking about nor do I want to know.
And I wouldn't dedicate a Thread to defend laws in different States over a subject like Pedophilia either. It's odd Nou, at least Amanda Knox is legal. |
|
|
| Fledz |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
thats a pretty bold claim my friend. He has the business of running a country and understands the premise of using debt to leverage.
not to undermine your capabilities, but isnt a rule of thumb for running a business to accumulate alot of debt in the first few years of opperation? I mean, obama's definatley stepping up to the plate in that department. |
There's also the fact that a new business is started from scratch where as running a country includes everything that was done before you were in power, and then you're supposed to work with it.
As for the OP, ffs. Epic facepalm Nou. |
|
|
| chlola |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
yep, pretty much a lot more action than you'll ever be getting. |
| quote: | Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
He is smarter than most people, including you. |
|
|
|
| The17sss |
Bumpity bump!
| quote: | FBI busts Florida man for alleged airborne masturbation

MAY 23--In another repulsive in-flight episode, a Florida man was arrested last Thursday by the FBI after he allegedly “masturbated to the point of ejaculation” while traveling on a United Airlines flight en route to Colorado, The Smoking Gun has learned.
Kyle Pearce, 25, was busted after United Airlines Flight 340 arrived in Denver from Spokane, Washington, according to an affidavit sworn by FBI Agent Martin Daniel. Pearce was named in a May 20 misdemeanor criminal complaint charging him with making an “obscene and indecent exposure of his person” on an aircraft.
As detailed by Daniel, an 18-year-old woman told investigators that she was seated in row 18 next to Pearce, who was in an aisle seat. “I sat next to a man on a plane who was masturbating. I heard a noise and looked over and saw his penis,” the teenager recalled in a written statement. She added, “He ejaculated & got some on the seat. Then he went to the bathroom for a long time.”
The woman reported that Pearce was wearing jeans tucked into cowboy boots, introduced himself as Kyle, and said he was connecting on to Orlando, Florida. Pearce’s MySpace page describes him as a junior college student who has been a bull rider for eight years.
A passenger seated directly behind Pearce, 18-year-old Grayson Miller, recalled that, “My friend Zach turned to me and said, ‘That man is masturbating’ and in disbelief, I looked and saw his penis and he was.” In his written statement, Miller reported that, “I hit him with my book in the arm, which caused him to stop and leave to the bathroom” in the Airbus A319. |
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/docume...urbation-546729 |
|
|
| tubularbills |
| :stongue: :stongue: :stongue: :stongue: |
|
|
| Zyklon_Jay |
| what the is wrong with people? :haha: I can get getting caught having sex on a plane (even still you are an idiot...but i get the draw of the mile high club thing.), but to jerk off? Words can not express how ing much some people are destined to die alone. |
|
|
| bigjimslade002 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Ygrene
If I was a black gurl, we'ze be gahhin head up ova sum Thin Mins. dem s#its am the mahhfuggin BIZomb! |
double fixed |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
While that possibly could hold ground, a charge like obscenity is very very very generic and vague. |
Do you know what section of what statute he was charged under? If you don't then you really have no grounds to make the above argument nor can you legitimately suggest that he did not violate the law. |
|
|
| Joss Weatherby |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
Do you know what section of what statute he was charged under? If you don't then you really have no grounds to make the above argument nor can you legitimately suggest that he did not violate the law. |
I never said he didn't break the law, but that the charge wouldn't stick. Most obscenity charges do not pass muster on appeal. |
|
|
| Zyklon_Jay |
| try citing something nou. i know they taught that in school, but i'm sure you'll figure it out. |
|
|
| Joss Weatherby |
| quote: | Originally posted by Zyklon_Jay
try citing something nou. i know they taught that in school, but i'm sure you'll figure it out. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United..._Called_Ulysses
(though the above makes an exception for works that promote lust) and probably most importantly these three...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_v._California
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcro...peech_Coalition
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americ...n_v._Strickland
Which will be what this case is probably ultimately argued on, or if not this case, the law that he is charged under itself.
The general trend in recent rulings has been to protect or dissolve people transmitting works that might be considered obscene from responsibility, especially in those involving depictions of minors that are not actually real (re: Ashcroft).
While Miller says that it is not protected by the constitution, it does say that state statutes must meet a certain definition of obscenity (which the case in question would probably pass as obscene) Both Ashcroft and American Booksellars Foundation for Free Expression though, have rulings that could be used to argue the legality of content, and that it would not pass the Miller test (especially Ashcroft).
I think that this guy will be found guilty but that it will be overturned on appeal based on the last two cases I posted. |
|
|
|
|