|
clockwork orange (pg. 5)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by Chimney
This thread gives me a headache. Are Brazilian chicks hot? |
Some of them are. Why? |
|
|
| Chimney |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Some of them are. Why? |
I need a reason for visiting Brazil.
EDIT: Spelling |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by Chimney
I need a reason for visiting Brazil.
EDIT: Spelling |
Well, Giselle and Adriana Lima are Brazilian :p |
|
|
| Chimney |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Well, Giselle and Adriana Lima are Brazilian :p |
5. The bibliography of an article:
A. May include papers presented to a medical congress
B. The bibliographic indexes are placed before the signals…
C. Represents the medical articles used to sustain the presented idea
D. We can use many reference systems (example …) in a medical article
Which are correct? I'm thinking of B, C. |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by Chimney
5. The bibliography of an article:
A. May include papers presented to a medical congress
B. The bibliographic indexes are placed before the signals…
C. Represents the medical articles used to sustain the presented idea
D. We can use many reference systems (example) in a medical article |
Hmm... I see no reason why papers presented to a medical congress shouldn't be added in the bibliography even if they're judged to be marginal. In linguistics it's not unusual to see that happen when commenting on any work in progress.
Apart from that, I tend to agree with you. Is there a reason why A is wrong in medicine? Can't you cite work in progress even if you did it in peer-reviewed environment? |
|
|
| Chimney |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Hmm... I see no reason why papers presented to a medical congress shouldn't be added in the bibliography even if they're judged to be marginal. In linguistics it's not unusual to see that happen when commenting on any work in progress.
Apart from that, I tend to agree with you. Is there a reason why A is wrong in medicine? Can't you cite work in progress even if you did it in peer-reviewed environment? |
Because of this (I think):
Use full length articles from peer reviewed journals
Abstracts are not allowed
Paper submitted but not accepted are not allowed
Limit references to key citations (20-40)
Place reference citations properly
- Previous reports have shown an incidence of 50%12,24,29
"Abstracts now allowed". |
|
|
| Meat187 |
How he did this thread go from Clockwork Orange over Star Wars to proper citation in scientific articles? :wtf:
Edit: Excuse my swearing today. I seem to have some sort of bipolar forum disorder. :crazy: |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by Chimney
Because of this (I think):
Use full length articles from peer reviewed journals
Abstracts are not allowed
Paper submitted but not accepted are not allowed
Limit references to key citations (20-40)
Place reference citations properly
- Previous reports have shown an incidence of 50%12,24,29
"Abstracts now allowed". |
Well, the annals of a scientific congress tend to be peer-reviewed - whether or not they're a journal is pretty much a matter of semantics, I believe, but I've never heard of a single conference/congress in which the papers submitted were not screened in a way or another. From what I understand, you can't use just the abstract (for obvious reasons) and/or stuff published in "unmoderated" media, such as blogs, magazines and the like. The rest is fair game.
Wait, where is this questionnaire from? That's all the info they provided you? :conf:
| quote: | Originally posted by Meat187
How he did this thread go from Clockwork Orange over Star Wars to proper citation in scientific articles? :wtf: |
Such are the dynamics of an internet forum :D
Apparently I tend to be the cause of such derailments whenever I post. I blame my ADHD and my utter inability to focus on any given subject for more than hey, look, trolley carts! :p |
|
|
| Chimney |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Well, the annals of a scientific congress tend to be peer-reviewed - whether or not they're a journal is pretty much a matter of semantics, I believe, but I've never heard of a single conference/congress in which the papers submitted were not screened in a way or another. From what I understand, you can't use just the abstract (for obvious reasons) and/or stuff published in "unmoderated" media, such as blogs, magazines and the like. The rest is fair game.
Wait, where is this questionnaire from? That's all the info they provided you? :conf:
Such are the dynamics of an internet forum :D
Apparently I tend to be the cause of such derailments whenever I post. I blame my ADHD and my utter inability to focus on any given subject for more than hey, look, trolley carts! :p |
Is "B" correct tho? |
|
|
| Lira |
| I don't know what they mean by "bibliographic index" and signals in this case. I googled these terms but I'm none the wiser :conf: |
|
|
| Chimney |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
I don't know what they mean by "bibliographic index" and signals in this case. I googled these terms but I'm none the wiser :conf: |
If I don't pass the exam the exam tomorrow, I'll go ape. |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by Chimney
If I don't pass the exam the exam tomorrow, I'll go ape. |
Keep your cool and I bet you can do it, Chim, don't worry! :)
You've been studying medicine (?) for as long as I remember! |
|
|
|
|
