Originally posted by Trance-MB
On a serious note. Some questions have not been answerred yet which as a mechanical engineer I think leave space for some doubts:
Yeah, like this dutch demolition expert (died two months ago driving against a tree) who didn't know that building 7 collapsed the same day.
idoru
Congratulations, you're a ing moron.
Trance-MB
quote:
Originally posted by idoru
Congratulations, you're a ing moron.
Why, you act like I'm convinced of something?
EddieZilker
quote:
Originally posted by Trance-MB
And videos like this, with clearly propagandandistic elements, confer so much legitimacy to these theories. If memory serves, Building 7 was a controlled demolition made two or three days after September 11. The engineer in your video is only being "told" that it occurred on the same day. He hasn't "discovered" this because of some uncovered, "hidden" evidence.
dr.america
9/11 was orchestrated by the United States and the supposed moon landing was actually filmed in a studio
Trance-MB
I have seen that video many times, but the smoke coming out of those windows doesn't look really strange to me.
Are you saying that did happen few days later?
Trance-MB
quote:
Originally posted by dr.america
supposed moon landing was actually filmed in a studio
Think that has been proven to be not possible (at that time).
EddieZilker
quote:
Originally posted by Trance-MB
I have seen that video many times, but the smoke coming out of those windows doesn't look really strange to me.
Are you saying that did happen few days later?
The building was damaged beyond repair, in the attack. It was going to fall, eventually, so they made a controlled demolition of it so that it wouldn't damage the surrounding buildings or hurt anyone in case it fell, laterally. But I didn't embed the video so that you could analyze it for clues relevant to the theory that it was deliberately imploded on September 11.
Look at the ridiculously over-the-top graphics and how it was edited. Listen to the music. It's ing retarded. My point is that you're linking to these paranoid imbeciles as though they were credible. They subvert their own credibility, however, trying to advance their message through very clear propagandistic manipulation.
On the first page you referenced, there's a slide (5) in the splash page slide show which has the phrase, "WTC Twin Towers EXPLOSIVE Evidence" in the upper right hand corner. Look at how the word EXPLOSIVE is positioned and how the font, as though it were stenciled on a crate of dynamite, differs from the rest of the text. If their argument didn't need to be supported with such a base suggestion, why put it up, at all?
Banora
Seems for the past few days the news if abuzz with the headline of "government has uncovered terrorist plot for 9/11 anniversary", but, really, it seems there is an uncovered 'new anniversary terrorist plot' every year.
Halcyon+On+On
They live on fear, they live on fear, they live on fear!
