Sold at 2006 for $140 million it could be worth more now.
1952 - Valued at $180 million
Because i wouldn't
when I see something like a jackson pollock paintings being valued at 140 and 180 million dollars it kills me inside that something like this can be valued so high. I may have not have a degree in Art but I know what looks good and what doesn't.
OrangestO
Guns and butter.
Halcyon+On+On
Are you an amateur stand-up comedian from 1985?
srussell0018
It doesn't matter if you like it or not. Obviously somebody likes it if it's worth that much money. Your taste doesn't arbitrarily define "art."
Lira
quote:
Originally posted by Titanium
I may have not have a degree in Art but I know what looks good and what doesn't.
And this thread is proof of how great an art critic you are :p
Titanium
quote:
Originally posted by Lira
And this thread is proof of how great an art critic you are :p
Meh to me it looks like a blob of paint that what it is there is no talent or skills involved in this.
Something like this involves skill and talent
Lira
Have you got any idea of why Pollock painted the way he did? Art is not just drawing pretty things, and you might want to read up on the history of art in order to understand why the hell abstract paintings are the way they are ;)
Mind you, people have very similar beliefs about the kind of music we listen to around here. "It doesn't take any skill to program a computer", after all.
srussell0018
quote:
Originally posted by Titanium
Meh to me it looks like a blob of paint that what it is there is no talent or skills involved in this.
Then surely you should be able to create a $180 million painting. Get to it.
Redd
perspective
go read a book numbnuts
Sykonee
Is it because you can't see the sailboat?
Sushipunk
Obviously, I'm no critic, but this seems more "shart" than "art".
