|
why wasn't ron paul elected? (pg. 7)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| colonelcrisp |
| quote: | Originally posted by rubez
that's like pointing to a maths answer without showing the working, if the sum was corrupt.
the weight of the matter is such, if a court ruled in the "deniers" favour, the country would ing implode.
the courts are as corrupt as anything else in america. you're another one who thinks they know better than ron paul. you don't. |
Rubez..... they're watching you.... keep it secret..... keep it safe..... |
|
|
| Innocence Lost |
| ahh damnit :haha: |
|
|
| Lews |
| Rubez, why don't you accept the 16th Amendment as legitimately allowing the U.S. government to levy an income tax? |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lews
Rubez, why don't you accept the 16th Amendment as legitimately allowing the U.S. government to levy an income tax? |
because he believes everything he reads on the internet (ie he's a thicko). |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
I've read around a bit now and I'm pretty sure that even Ron Paul doesn't actually think "there is no law that forces you pay income tax" or that the US government is illegally collecting it.
Rubez, can you please provide a source showing where Ron Paul states these things? |
|
|
| Dykes_on_Jay |
| *waits for The Sun or The Weekly World News* |
|
|
| rubez |
ron paul says there is no law that he can cite - it's implied (already linked to it in this thread somewhere)
he can't cite it out of ignorance, it's because it isn't technically there. i don't think 'implied' is good enough when dealing with the law. it's a case of pay or else. anytime anyone has asked to see the law (when being tried) they haven't been able to produce it. surely it should be your right to see it.
a guy called whitey harrell was found not guilty for not paying his taxes, because the jury couldn't find the law - and the judge failed to provide them with it upon request. |
|
|
| Lews |
| I'm 99.9(repeating)% sure the 16th Amendment is technically there. Why don't you find that acceptable? |
|
|
| rubez |
amendment. law.
two different things. |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| quote: | Originally posted by rubez
amendment. law.
two different things. |
constitutional amendment supersedes legislation. i fail to see the point you are trying to make........ but the fact stands, you're wrong.... income tax is legal..... |
|
|
|
|
