|
why wasn't ron paul elected? (pg. 9)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| rubez |
also, OT:
watch this from 4:12 (you can skip the speech) compulsive viewing. you wonder why people haven't said more about this, or even bother voting.
wouldn't it have been paul up again obama if it weren't for this? instead of the limp-as- puppet head romney? mitt had NO CHANCE. ron paul did, and if you seen what he was gonna do, it would have been truly transformative. that's why he got derailed though and voters had their votes stolen. i like the bit it says about illusion of choice, seems to be true. i think legitimately it should have been gore instead of bush (looks where that took us) looks like the same sort of thing they did with paul, ing with the votes. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: |
In 1913, the Sixteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was ratified. It empowered Congress to tax "incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration." The Internal Revenue Code is today embodied as Title 26 of the United States Code (26 U.S.C.) and is a lineal descendant of the income tax act passed in 1913, following ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment. While some states do not have an income tax (Nevada), all residents and all citizens of the United States are subject to the federal income tax. |
god i love a dish of Humble Pie in the evening, ohm nom nom! :stongue::stongue: |
|
|
| rubez |
can you go away please, seriously. you're like some piece of ignored chihuahua barking for attention.
watch the video at least. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| awwww, rubez doesn't know what a united states code is :stongue: |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
i just think it's hilarious that you cried for half the thread about nobody able to show which laws related to federal income tax :stongue: when the blatantly obvious is explained to you, off you go on some random tangential bollocks.
7. Inability to withdraw.
It's a rare day indeed when a conspiracy theorist admits that a claim they have made has turned out to be without foundation, whether it be the overall claim itself or any of the evidence produced to support it. Moreover they have a liking (see 3. above) for the technique of avoiding discussion of their claims by "swamping" - piling on a whole lot more material rather than respond to the objections sceptics make to the previous lot.
were your parents too poor to send you to university? nawww, peasant scots. |
|
|
| rubez |
i shall not be replying to whatever else you have to say, sensible or not now. you ruin it for yourself.
by all means though, waste you breath.
to anyone else, watch the video... it's eye-opening. also there's the bonus of having tangerine dream in there ;) |
|
|
| Dykes_on_Jay |
| Essentially you have admitted defeat. How Ron Paul of you. |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| quote: | Originally posted by rubez
can you go away please, seriously. you're like some piece of ignored chihuahua barking for attention.
watch the video at least. |
......because youtube videos are the pinnacle of properly researched factual information..... may i also suggest a viewing of "loose change" or perhaps one of the "Apollo mission exposed as a hoax" videos..... |
|
|
| rubez |
i would trust 'youtube' more than i trust fox news, that's for sure.
youtube is just a host anyhow, it isn't an indication of trustworthiness or quality. so your argument goes right down the ter.
i assume you didn't even bother to watch the video before talking - the video is basically a collage of hard facts, numpty.
wake up fool. |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| quote: | Originally posted by rubez
i would trust 'youtube' more than i trust fox news, that's for sure.
youtube is just a host anyhow, it isn't an indication of trustworthiness or quality. so your argument goes right down the ter.
i assume you didn't even bother to watch the video before talking - the video is basically a collage of hard facts, numpty.
wake up fool. |
 |
|
|
| rubez |
you just make yourself look retarded posting stuff like that, i hope you are aware.
other than that... why have you quoted me, and seemingly responded with that?!
it's irrelevant, it doesn't even make sense you imbecile. |
|
|
|
|
