|
Transage (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by luckystrike
You can't describe perfectly how something is used when it is not used at all. |
Are you seriously saying the word is not used at all? First you bring the word up, then you say you don't agree with the definition, and now you say the word is not used. If it ain't used, why did you bring it up to begin with!?
| quote: | Originally posted by luckystrike
'Cisgender' is a non-word that which is thrown around by the mentally ill regressive left and triggered trannies. |
You need to make up your mind. Either the word is not used, or it's thrown around by people - you can't have it both ways.
| quote: | Originally posted by luckystrike
Pardon me for not being complicit in your mission to smash the patriarchy. |
You're mixing the words up again. I'm a linguist, not a leftist. |
|
|
| wotyzoid |
| This is fun, I like it when Lira gets involved. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| Oh damn, this guy has been here since 2001? Thought it was just another really piss poor new troll account. |
|
|
| planetaryplayer |
| Im pushing 70 but my bowels are pushing 90 |
|
|
| luckystrike |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Are you seriously saying the word is not used at all? First you bring the word up, then you say you don't agree with the definition |
Wrong. I never said anything about the definition of 'cisgender'. I used its presence in the Oxford and Cambridge dictionaries as an example of how the dictionaries are appeasing the far left. They are adding dumbass non-words and changing definitions for the snowflake PC generation.
I've not mixed up any words. If you're a linguist then you should understand nuances. |
|
|
| wotyzoid |
| What the is even your argument? Gender is not a social construct because the dictionary is not good enough at defining words but you are? |
|
|
| luckystrike |
| quote: | Originally posted by wotyzoid
What the is even your argument? Gender is not a social construct because the dictionary is not good enough at defining words but you are? |
Look at older dictionaries and they won't define it as such. |
|
|
| wotyzoid |
| So by your own admission you are stuck in the past. |
|
|
| DJ RANN |
Oh ing christ, this thread is classic TA, like TA arguments of yesteryear.
Some proper zingers in there well. Babylonians gave me the lols. |
|
|
| luckystrike |
| quote: | Originally posted by wotyzoid
So by your own admission you are stuck in the past. |
If that's the way you want to look at it, sure.
But that doesn't mean I have to accept or adhere to the PC generation. |
|
|
| DJ RANN |
| quote: | Originally posted by luckystrike
If that's the way you want to look at it, sure.
But that doesn't mean I have to accept or adhere to the PC generation. |
I'll bite lol.
What about words like Alt-Right, Pede, and Open Carrry that were added to the dictionaries this year?
Or is is that just 74d chess by the SJW's to label all the freemen? |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by luckystrike
If you're a linguist then you should understand nuances. |
Exactly, and I'm telling you that's exactly what you're missing. It's literally part of my job, and I'm not even criticising your conservative values or anything.
I'm just giving you a heads up before you look so dense not even light will bounce back from you. We don't want that, do we? |
|
|
|
|
