return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Music Discussion

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 
What happened to Lightning Records? (pg. 9)
View this Thread in Original format
gaz@influential
Can I just challenge the assertion a lot of people are making that record labels rely on vinyl sales?

For a lot of labels royalties from compilation licensing can actually make more than vinyl sales, which are obviously on CD, therefore mp3s do affect them.
tor8024
quote:
Originally posted by gaz@influential
Can I just challenge the assertion a lot of people are making that record labels rely on vinyl sales?

For a lot of labels royalties from compilation licensing can actually make more than vinyl sales, which are obviously on CD, therefore mp3s do affect them.


i don't know any figures, but i hardly think trance labels earn more money from compilations than from vinyls. they target clubs, not the masses..
robstar
quote:
Originally posted by tor8024
i don't know any figures, but i hardly think trance labels earn more money from compilations than from vinyls.


But they do! Putting tracks on vinly is pretty expensive, if someone puts ur track on a compilation u don't have to pay for the pressing. So since u don't have any expensives u make more money.
CygnusX
quote:
Originally posted by robstar
But they do! Putting tracks on vinly is pretty expensive, if someone puts ur track on a compilation u don't have to pay for the pressing. So since u don't have any expensives u make more money.


I think so 2.
Lightning Records and its sublabels released a lot of compilations here in Belgium and the last 2 or 3 years, I've seen like 10 copied or downloaded compilations for every original (bought) compilation.
Dumonde Trancer
quote:
Originally posted by gaz@influential
Can I just challenge the assertion a lot of people are making that record labels rely on vinyl sales?

For a lot of labels royalties from compilation licensing can actually make more than vinyl sales, which are obviously on CD, therefore mp3s do affect them.



yeh but arnt all liscences purchased before the CD's are sold thus unaffected by the how many CD's are sold?
M.A.R.K
quote:
Originally posted by Dumonde Trancer
yeh but arnt all liscences purchased before the CD's are sold thus unaffected by the how many CD's are sold?


i think they also receieve royalties for every cd sold too.
robstar
quote:
Originally posted by M.A.R.K
i think they also receieve royalties for every cd sold too.


Yup!
Dumonde Trancer
quote:
Originally posted by M.A.R.K
i think they also receieve royalties for every cd sold too.


righteo

fair play

but lets face it most cd ompilations are , i dont even download them let alone buy them
robstar
quote:
Originally posted by Dumonde Trancer
righteo

fair play

but lets face it most cd ompilations are , i dont even download them let alone buy them


Yeah! Out of 20 compilations 19 are e and 1 is good. ;/
Eugene
quote:
Originally posted by SuperFarStucker
There simply isnt any data available that prove mp3s are killing the scene or helping it..

On the contrary.
There have been many studies, and they all prove that, if anything, MP3's actually help the industry.

I, for example, am not a big MP3 junkie; I have very few MP3's and am not so addicted to the whole WinMX/Napster/.. culture. As a DJ I have a big collection of vinyl, and I regularly buy vinyl, as well as Trance CD's and DJ mixes that are available in stores.

However, if I were to hear an MP3 that I liked, I would immediately search to see if it's available on vinyl, and if I really liked it, yes, I would buy the vinyl! Vinyl nowadays exists mostly for the DJ. And, as a DJ, I'd love to add that track to my collection. There's also the quality argument: What audiophile would listen to a lower-quality MP3? Most people who like music are audiophiles. Those who just grab the MP3's and spend their time leeching stuff are not true fans, they're amateurs. And trust me, there are enough audiophiles out there, as well as DJs.

So, DJMayTag, I disagree with your argument, and there have been studies that show MP3 in a much more favorable light than you think. I can find you some links if you want.

MisterOpus1
Here's a few pro-MP3 links for you:

http://www.azoz.com/music/features/0008.html

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/archive/26710.html

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/archive/28588.html

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/28919.html

Don't know exactly where to find anti-MP3 news that's truly valid. I suppose you could simply go to www.riaa.com for that.
tor8024
quote:
Originally posted by robstar
But they do! Putting tracks on vinly is pretty expensive, if someone puts ur track on a compilation u don't have to pay for the pressing. So since u don't have any expensives u make more money.


i was talking about the compilations labels release themselves. so in that case, there is pressing involved..
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 
Privacy Statement