 |
|
|
|
 |
Jay M
Connecting dots...

Registered: Jan 2004
Location: The Hague, Holland
|
|
|
Sep-11-2005 19:39
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Stu Cox
Supreme smackaddict

Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Southampton, UK
|
|
|
For a start, I personally wouldn't really call this "dramatic", but hey I suppose it's a matter of how you interpret both the word and the music.
Quite a cool track in general, melodies are nice although I don't find them particularly exciting myself. But obviously that's all subjective so I'll move onto commnets on production now 
Production-wise the levels are all good and the whole thing sounds "well-packaged", if that is a suitable term... you can hear everything clearly, it sounds quite full etc.
I think what it could do with is more attention to detail on things like the percussion, pads, fx etc. e.g. introducing more one-off hits - I know you've added some sounds occuring once every 4 or 8 bars but I think it would really benefit from some more 'un-classifiable' sounds as part of the groove - I don't think it needs any more rolling ryhthms (well, maybe just one or two with midrange sounds) but things that occur once or twice in a bar which sound more rhythmical than incidental.
Again, with your sound effects you've got (sweep sounds etc), I think the fact that they're so few and far in between they just sound like they've been thrown in for the sake of it instead of being part of the track, in parts at least. Personally I'm not a fan of the quite high thin sweep you've used in a couple of places (occurs at 3:21) - as it's the only sound effect there, it just sounds really weak on it's own... a much thicker sweep sound would work a lot better I feel, or use that over the top of other effects etc with a lot of reverb to kind of merge it in with the other sounds...
I know you've got a lot of cool ideas so I'm really looking forward to hearing your future stuff, but there are certain things I feel you need to work on to make your tracks sound more involved. That's a good word, think it's quite applicable - make it more involved 
Just my few cents/pence/centimes/sen worth 
Your mark... 5/10
(Scale: 0 = don't bother, 1-3 = needs work, 4-5 = nearly there, 6-8 = releasable, 9-10 = outstanding)
___________________
Stu Cox | 

|
|
Sep-12-2005 21:58
|
|
|
 |
 |
Stu Cox
Supreme smackaddict

Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Southampton, UK
|
|
|
Sep-13-2005 16:59
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
dannyc
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Aug 2004
Location: dublin, ireland
|
|
|
simple and straight to the point just the way i like it and as someone else said earlier what labels like too.
i feel you've kinda gone for the airwave sound which i love btw, deep and emotional
i love your melodies in this one, bass lacks drive and power thou think as someone said theres too much reverb on it, should keep it mono. the synths are nice too real easy on the ear, but i think they need more space to breath they'd be hard to hear on a loud club sound system and you want the listener to be able to grasp the melody.
that breakdown was wonderful i loved that gated effect pad, i dont even know how thats done maybe you can help me out? breaks was very simple but i thought it worked, you dont want it to be too complex and take away from the rest of the track.
i think you should stick with this one for a bit longer cause i think it has alot of potential, u just need to learn some filtering, volume fades, transistions,fx and mastering then you'll have a gem on your hands 
|
|
Sep-13-2005 21:30
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:49.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|