return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 
post your SAT scores (pg. 8)
View this Thread in Original format
S-a-M-u-E-l
bah i hate it when people attempt to look smart in these forums by using big words/inflated and verbose speech
emander
quote:
Originally posted by S-a-M-u-E-l
bah i hate it when people attempt to look smart in these forums by using big words/inflated and verbose speech


Then like I said before, just post your dick length... HHAHHAHAAAAAA!!!
DeviantxPete
What the hell is mensa anyways?
rabbitjoker
quote:
Originally posted by DeviantxPete
What the hell is mensa anyways?


http://www.mensa.org/info.html
dehmmy
i'd like to hold a contest for the lowest SAT score.. I got below a 900 total
ali92
quote:
Originally posted by dehmmy
i'd like to hold a contest for the lowest SAT score.. I got below a 900 total


OK. Here's my SAT I score: 859

Even though I got an 859 on it, I still have plenty of people (that got over 1200 or so) telling me that I have somewhat above average intelligence. I never really believed in standardised testing to determine intelligence. After all, the bulk of what I speak about that may even seem educational (travel, culture, date/time formats, [amateur] astronomy, PCs, audio/video, etc.) would just never be on there. When I took the SAT back on 2003-01-25 08:30--11:30, I thought that there was going to be the whoel breadth of secondary education in there. There really was just a few selected portions and some areas didn't even get touched at all.

PS: /me is on this PC about 18--19 h/d.
PPS: Is all standardised testing is for is to show how well you can study for a test or take a test. That's all. Rant over.
dehmmy
quote:
Originally posted by ali92
OK. Here's my SAT I score: 859

Even though I got an 859 on it, I still have plenty of people (that got over 1200 or so) telling me that I have somewhat above average intelligence. I never really believed in standardised testing to determine intelligence. After all, the bulk of what I speak about that may even seem educational (travel, culture, date/time formats, [amateur] astronomy, PCs, audio/video, etc.) would just never be on there. When I took the SAT back on 2003-01-25 08:30--11:30, I thought that there was going to be the whoel breadth of secondary education in there. There really was just a few selected portions and some areas didn't even get touched at all.

PS: /me is on this PC about 18--19 h/d.
PPS: Is all standardised testing is for is to show how well you can study for a test or take a test. That's all. Rant over.


yeah I have mad a.d.d. I could barely sit in the chair.. whatever .. it's an inacurate test at determining any useful information as to how a student will perform at a university
ali92
quote:
Originally posted by dehmmy
yeah I have mad a.d.d. I could barely sit in the chair.. whatever .. it's an inacurate test at determining any useful information as to how a student will perform at a university


I've also been told around 2004-05-08 that I may have Asperger's Syndrome. I was once diagnosed with AD/HD (1990) and even was on medication for it until around late 1998. I still get quite obsessed with certain things and am very particular about things. I often would prefer to do things myself or if I don't know how, learn how and do it. Another example is that I probably would prefer to drive rather than being in a limousine (doesn't it sound nuts?) for a trip for my leisure, as I (would) like to blast my Trance, etc. down the motorway at about 150 km/h with a police detector for slowing down! Oh, not to mention I would like a PC in the dashboard running Linux with an uptime of 24-7-366.

(rant over)
UWM
quote:
Originally posted by ali92


PS: /me is on this PC about 18--19 h/d.


Job? Life? Food? Sleep?

:nervous:
TranceGiant
690 math
550 english (english =! my native tongue)

davinox
quote:
Originally posted by ali92
OK. Here's my SAT I score: 859

Even though I got an 859 on it, I still have plenty of people (that got over 1200 or so) telling me that I have somewhat above average intelligence. I never really believed in standardised testing to determine intelligence. After all, the bulk of what I speak about that may even seem educational (travel, culture, date/time formats, [amateur] astronomy, PCs, audio/video, etc.) would just never be on there. When I took the SAT back on 2003-01-25 08:30--11:30, I thought that there was going to be the whoel breadth of secondary education in there. There really was just a few selected portions and some areas didn't even get touched at all.

PS: /me is on this PC about 18--19 h/d.
PPS: Is all standardised testing is for is to show how well you can study for a test or take a test. That's all. Rant over.


1.) get off of the computer
2.) i don't think a score of 859 is possible, I thought it was in multipules of ten...
3.) you should have taken a practice test to prepare, so it's i
intirely your fault.


edit: oh you have asperger's. i see. take meds. society is a cruel, cruel place for people who think differently.
tubularbills
SAT? wow that brings back memories. i got an 1140 on it [720 on Math, and 420 on Verbal]. yeah, verbal ain't my thing. LOL.

i'm glad i'm done w/ standardized testing. and i'm not taking the GREs, so whew!
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 
Privacy Statement