|
Premarital sex (survey) (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| torontotrance |
| Sad? Nah.....I'm the happiest I've been (for reasons that I won't disclose) in almost a year. |
|
|
| Arbiter |
| quote: | Originally posted by torontotrance
get it right, all beliefs are based on blind faith rather than reason. Who says your reasoning is right? |
No, my beliefs are based on observation, experience, and logic. Religious beliefs, in contrast, are based on the baseless acceptance of religious dogma.
In my case, the belief is derived from empirical data and valid induction or deduction - by definition it is not "blind" because it is derived from observation. When it comes to religion, no such empirical evidence exists and the associated logic is invariably invalid.
If you feel my reasoning is wrong then why don't you raise a logically valid objection to it instead of throwing around pointless non sequiturs like usual? |
|
|
| Buddhistics |
| quote: | Originally posted by Mattsanity
Premarital Sex is totally wrong, because God said so. |
Well I AM God....and I say YES!!!!
| quote: | Originally posted by BTG
I refuse to have sex until the next chance i get. |
....*ROFLMAO*...:haha: :haha: :haha: |
|
|
| Radagast |
Well, there's always the small chance that we're meant by nature to have life-long sexual relationships with one person. Monogomy is seen naturally in animal species such as seahorses, gibbons, gannets, swans, and geese for example.
Then again this is pure speculation and could have been proven wrong at one point or another that i'm unaware of. |
|
|
| DJ_Bod |
| I see nothing wrong with it. |
|
|
| nekholm |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ Intrigue
The only downside to sex is pregnacy and at 19 years old, that's not something I want to have to deal with and provide for yet. |
Guess what? Some smart guy invented something called "protection". The most secure "protection" is called "condom", which gives about 97% security. So by using a "condom" when you have sex, the girl is most likely not to get pregnant. You can surely find "condoms" in a shop near you. Give it a try, ok? :) |
|
|
| Radagast |
| quote: | Originally posted by nekholm
which gives about 97% security. |
Too rich for my blood. |
|
|
| CygnusX |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
There is something wrong with sexual misconduct, I must say, but as for premarital sex, as long as both parts are in a stable relationship, it can only get things better. |
I agree with Lira here. Imagine marrying the girl you love and then finding out things don't work in the sack for you two. That's one of the reasons why I'm pro premarital sex in a stable long-term relationship. |
|
|
| UglyDave |
| it's ok because sex is great fun :) |
|
|
| UWM |
| quote: | Originally posted by torontotrance
get it right, all beliefs are based on blind faith rather than reason. Who says your reasoning is right? |
That is an absolutely asinine statement. |
|
|
| UWM |
| quote: | Originally posted by nekholm
Guess what? Some smart guy invented something called "protection". The most secure "protection" is called "condom", which gives about 97% security. So by using a "condom" when you have sex, the girl is most likely not to get pregnant. You can surely find "condoms" in a shop near you. Give it a try, ok? :) |
You must not have heard of "birth control pills" or "hormone injections" or "patches." |
|
|
| Nite-Mer |
| quote: | Originally posted by torontotrance
No, the iffy ones or the ones who say they are but are'nt do that. |
Don't be a hypocrite and give christians a bad name. We all have our flaws, and you have flaws too. I might have had sex out of marriage before. Even though I don't think it's right, I am sure you have sworn before or lied or envied someone. "Judge not, lest yee be judged." |
|
|
|
|
