|
ps3 leak of specs (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Aiwendil |
| man...the ps3 is going to kick six kinds of ass...but then...what if the xbox 360 kicks twelve kinds of ass? :nervous: |
|
|
| Yan |
| quote: | Originally posted by MaRt
What I'd like to see now is a strong selection of software at launch, a rejigged controller and an affordable price. Somehow, I think that last one might be out of the question. :( |
Last two, I'd say. |
|
|
| Minihero |
Looks pretty damn smart :D
But playing games is not all you can do on it...
:stongue: |
|
|
| Fundamental |
| quote: | Originally posted by MaRt
I was bored (and sad) enough to watch the entire PS3 conference on GameSpot. It's all about the rubber ducks and the Eyetoy interaction, seriously. |
The ducks were awesome! :D |
|
|
| Blue. |
| Looks like a car amp. I'd rather save my money for XBOX 360, money well spent. |
|
|
| daydreamer |
| quote: | Originally posted by Yan
I wish.
It's only a technical demo. |
sorry im a gamer noob, whats the difference? |
|
|
| DRM |
| quote: | Originally posted by Blue.
Looks like a car amp. I'd rather save my money for XBOX 360, money well spent. |
personally i think the xbox came off looking by war the worst of the three |
|
|
| Blue. |
| quote: | Originally posted by DRM
personally i think the xbox came off looking by war the worst of the three |
Better than the car amp and half a steering wheel :stongue: |
|
|
| Blue. |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nou
Who gives a flying what it looks like?!?! It could look and smell like dog and I would still buy it.
The X-Box360 is a glorified PC with less features. |
and the PS3 will be just like the PS2, inferior to the XBOX in all departments except for a few extra games. |
|
|
| Blue. |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nou
....
no.
if you consider inferior to be faster processor (400 million transitors and an amazing 2 teraflops of floating point calculations per second), higher graphical output (2 megapixel, 32:9 ratio, 1080p output), more advanced shader instructions (better than any computer shaders at the moment and more adavanced and on closer par to shaders used in CGI render farms), better HDR (extremely dynamic lighting, 128bit color precision), 512megs of VRAM (PS2 had 4), and advanced optical storage mediums (54 gig blueray discs anyone?), then yes, it is inferior. :rolleyes:
Learn something about what these specs mean and you will see that the Cell Processor and Reality Synthesizer are far superior to the X-Boxs capabilities. |
and that will mean nothing if it ends up being just as ty as the ps2s capabilities, hence my point. you're looking at specs meaning you know on paper what it can do, maybe you've seen a few demos but looks are nothing if the game sucks. a powerful gaming system means all if it has no features.
the xbox outdid ps2 in so many categories and i expect it to be equaly as capable in the future. quit posting specs and you might learn something. |
|
|
| Blue. |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nou
The only place the x-box out did the PS2 was Halo.
Almost every top seller on the X-Box list besides Halo is a game that was released on the PS2 and is also in their top selling list.
PS2 shipped more units of hardware and more units of software then the X-Box as well.
The PS2 also has had consistantly better games by review and by sales than the X-Box (Think MGS2, MGS3, FFX, FFX2, GTA3, GTA VC, GTA SA).
PS2 beat out X-Box in terms of quality and quantity. |
Like I always say, the only thing a PS2 lover can say is "oh but it has a few better games". Not only does Halo have a lot of awesome games of its own (Jade Empire, Ninja Gaiden, etc.) but it has an endless list of features and more of a modding fanbase more than any other console.
Wow now you play the popularity card, another winner as far as arguments go /end sarcasm
The PS2 has a lot of games shared with XBOX, a number of which got higher ratings on XBOX than on PS2. |
|
|
|
|
