return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 
Ancient artwork depicting aliens, UFOs ... (pg. 11)
View this Thread in Original format
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


Your pic doesnt work. And its not proof of God, silly ... please re-read my previous post.

Here's a good page with photos on Easter Island faces, some of those are 10-20 tons in weight, many of them were made, and they are far away from rock quarries where they could have been cut from:

http://www.3dphoto.net/world/latin_...ter/easter.html


Quite impressive to actually find out how they were made, dragged and placed ...


pic works on my PC. perhaps the government's monitoring your net usage and making things unstable?

its a picture of a statue of horus. which to me, is about as much evidence of god as your paintings are of aliens.
Magnetonium
quote:
Originally posted by venomX
What the crap, you just contradicted yourself between this post and the last. First you say theres no proof they were dragged/carved, then you say "oh heres how they were dragged and carved".?!?!


Sigh ... I said IT WOULD BE impressive to find out how EXACTLY these stone were cut and dragged (if they were dragged). I assume they were dragged by the official story, so II was being a bit sarcastic and stating "yeah, sure, I wanna see how they did it" cause I had my own ideas on it.

By no means this Easter Island thing has much to do with the main topic, its just I've been reading about Easter Island lately.

Back to the original topic - so what do you say about that wicked egyptian advanced technology shown in the pictures?

How do you expplain the mathematical genius behind the construction of Cheops Pyramid, and then lets say, Mayan Pyramid of the Sun?
Magnetonium
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
pic works on my PC. perhaps the government's monitoring your net usage and making things unstable?

its a picture of a statue of horus. which to me, is about as much evidence of god as your paintings are of aliens.


They're not my paintings or my architectures - they were done many years ago describing what these people seen or experienced!

Call them crazy if you wish, call them liars and dreamers ... I looked at some of those photos and clearly saw something else.
Magnetonium


Please, please tell me what this is:



What were these Egyptians holding???
venomX
quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


Sigh ... I said IT WOULD BE impressive to find out how EXACTLY these stone were cut and dragged (if they were dragged). I assume they were dragged by the official story, so II was being a bit sarcastic and stating "yeah, sure, I wanna see how they did it" cause I had my own ideas on it.

By no means this Easter Island thing has much to do with the main topic, its just I've been reading about Easter Island lately.

Back to the original topic - so what do you say about that wicked egyptian advanced technology shown in the pictures?

How do you expplain the mathematical genius behind the construction of Cheops Pyramid, and then lets say, Mayan Pyramid of the Sun?


Im not talking about the Cheops Pyramid, im merely pointing out that your theory about the Easter Island statues is wrong as it has been proved to a good extent how the statues would have been dragged and propped up. Also the carving is a no brainer, the tools they used where found at the quarries, along with statues at different stages of completion, so please save us the CT on this one, because there is plenty of evidence to the contrary.

As far as the pyramids go, my guess is as good as yours when it comes to the mathemathical complexity of them.
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


Please, please tell me what this is:



What were these Egyptians holding???


an urn with snakes in it.

otherwise, its DEFINITELY something alien! thats the most logical next step obviously! :haha:
Magnetonium
quote:
Originally posted by venomX
Im not talking about the Cheops Pyramid, im merely pointing out that your theory about the Easter Island statues is wrong as it has been proved to a good extent how the statues would have been dragged and propped up. Also the carving is a no brainer, the tools they used where found at the quarries, along with statues at different stages of completion, so please save us the CT on this one, because there is plenty of evidence to the contrary.

As far as the pyramids go, my guess is as good as yours when it comes to the mathemathical complexity of them.


These Easter Island stipulations make a lot of common sense, though I have some other ideas too ;-) and I am not 100% for them ... I think there's some missing pieces of history that arent accounted for in the official description, but I wont get to that!

I am just curious though, do you really think it was aliens involved or is it just remnants from previous civilization that helped or built the Cheops Pyramid and then the Egyptians stole the idea and called it their emperor's burial place?

Or do you stick with the main official story that Egyptians did build it all ... just curious at to what you're leaning to
venomX
quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


These Easter Island stipulations make a lot of common sense, though I have some other ideas too ;-) and I am not 100% for them ... I think there's some missing pieces of history that arent accounted for in the official description, but I wont get to that!

I am just curious though, do you really think it was aliens involved or is it just remnants from previous civilization that helped or built the Cheops Pyramid and then the Egyptians stole the idea and called it their emperor's burial place?

Or do you stick with the main official story that Egyptians did build it all ... just curious at to what you're leaning to

I havent read any of the information available on the Egyptian pyramids so i cant really conclude anything. All the knowledge i have is basically for the "official" explanation so i cant really say otherwise. Im more versed in the Anasazi, Maya, Easter Islanders and some others because im reading a book on the collapse of ancient civilizations and the patterns that emerge from their study. It could've been ancient civilizations are aliens for all i know, but i think the point that alot of people are trying to make here is that just because we dont know how something happened yet, doesnt mean it has an extroardinary explanation. Hell, maybe in the future when all these things are studied further and theres more information available we'll uncover that it was aliens, or that there was some other advanced civilization before use. But for the time being i think critical review of the information at hand is more important than falling in love with the more romantic explanations.
Magnetonium


Alright, how about another question: do you think our civilization started off on the ruins of the previous lost collapsed civilization, or did we merely develop like the history books say? What is your educated thought on this?

Archeological studies in Babylon area unearthed several layers of different cities built over on top of each other in different eras ... one city on top of another, about 3 different unique layers. And the whole story of the flood actually comes from Sumerian stories BTW, and Christians took it for their Bible as well.
pkcRAISTLIN
i have a question. why do you find it so easy to ignore popularly accepted points of view in favour of outlandish claims? (ie 9/11, aliens, diana etc.)

venomX
quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


Alright, how about another question: do you think our civilization started off on the ruins of the previous lost collapsed civilization, or did we merely develop like the history books say? What is your educated thought on this?

Archeological studies in Babylon area unearthed several layers of different cities built over on top of each other in different eras ... one city on top of another, about 3 different unique layers. And the whole story of the flood actually comes from Sumerian stories BTW, and Christians took it for their Bible as well.

I dont know :p I have some free time right now so ill read up a bit on this and get back to you. From what i know the information that has been proved to a reasonable extent and that is "mainstream" points to a development similar to what history books say. I wouldnt be amazed if things change or are corrected, or other information is added in the future, after all it has happened before and as our knowledge of the world increases its bound to happen again.
Magnetonium
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
i have a question. why do you find it so easy to ignore popularly accepted points of view in favour of outlandish claims? (ie 9/11, aliens, diana etc.)


Question to you - why do you ignorantly follow the lame and predictable explanations of governments and how they run things? BTW, this is not the right thread ;-)
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 
Privacy Statement