return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 
Please torrent FL Studio.. (pg. 12)
View this Thread in Original format
sixofour.604
quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
So you're basing your entire opinion on the very first version of a software that you tried for 20 minutes?

All right, now you got me convinced.


I don't have an opinion about ableton. The rest of the world thinks it has a bad sound, wether its due to the engine just being , or the developers making it sound like by default, doesn't matter. A large large bulk of people from all skill levels and all backgrounds, agree that ableton has something up with its sound.

Can't argue with the exprienses of legions of people. Unless, like I said before, you want to believe that every person who has ever had this sound problem...all decided in secret one day to lie and make up some large conspiracy about ableton, you have to accept the issue for what it is.
Mr.Mystery
quote:
Originally posted by sixofour.604
I don't have an opinion about ableton.

Then why do you imply you do?
EgosXII
quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
:stongue:

Exactly what I thought. You haven't tried the thing in 8 years since version 1 and you're harping on about it? AHAHAHAHHAHA :haha:


i will continue upgrading my sig until i can find one as good as yours and echo's... :whip:
MrJiveBoJingles
quote:
Originally posted by sixofour.604
I tried Ableton when it came out in 2001, couldn't even find the sequencer after 20 minutes

LOL! :stongue:
evo8
quote:
Originally posted by sixofour.604
I don't have an opinion about ableton. The rest of the world thinks it has a bad sound, wether its due to the engine just being , or the developers making it sound like by default, doesn't matter. A large large bulk of people from all skill levels and all backgrounds, agree that ableton has something up with its sound.

Can't argue with the exprienses of legions of people. Unless, like I said before, you want to believe that every person who has ever had this sound problem...all decided in secret one day to lie and make up some large conspiracy about ableton, you have to accept the issue for what it is.


sixofour.604 you are ing gold my friend - keep up the good work lmafao :haha:

SGL, can you post these renders which seem "washed out and airy" and also some that dont sound like this? would like to have a listen and compare, thanks
echosystm
quote:
Originally posted by sixofour.604
Back in the day Cubase SX3 was the front line app, but FL7 pretty much matched everything it had to offer.


Other than proper multithreading, decent hardware support and automatic delay compensation. Cubase had the first two since ~2000 and auto PDC in ~2003. FL has only just implemented proper multithreading, 9 years after Cubase, and still doesn't have the other two. lol.

FYI: I used FL for about 4 years, when I started out. I threw in the towel 2 years ago when I realised Gol is a cockface. The grass IS greener on the Steinberg side ;)

quote:
Originally posted by sixofour.604
We are at FL9.


And only one thing has changed...lololol. Meanwhile, Cubase has just added VariAudio... You'll probably be waiting another 5 years to get it in FL Studio. Way to fail ImageLine.
david.michael
This thread is fatiguing.
mfitterer1
quote:
Originally posted by sixofour.604
Yeah, I pirated all my software, and you didn't. And I will still make better music. :)

Btw, Ive been using FL since 1998. Before Ableton was a twinkle in anyones eye. I tried Ableton when it came out in 2001, couldn't even find the sequencer after 20 minutes...I have since deleted it, and never tried it again. And its currently the worst of the major DAWs, and its no wonder why. It has, according to you, bad sound quality by default.

Its funny how everyone hates on FL because it advanced faster than any other DAW. FL needs to fix hardware delay...that one thing will literally put FL on the front wave. [well, it will shut most of you up anyways] Like I said, Pro-Tools is pretty much the only competition. Ableton has a ty sound engine [google ableton, its the number one problem], cubase has a ty everything in version 4 and 5 [, no one even wants to pirate it..lol], Logic is on Mac, and by the masses, thats a downfall in and of itself. Because that means all you can use your computer for is logic..because lets face it, Macs don't have ANY GOOD SOFTWARE on them besides logic and photoshop. People these days want computers for multi-purposes. Reason doesn't have vsti support..its basicly protools without the good stuff. Did I miss anything?

Back in the day Cubase SX3 was the front line app, but FL7 pretty much matched everything it had to offer. We are at FL9.


Lol you spewed off so much here I don't know what's worth responding to.

If you're interested we can each put up a track and see what everyone opinion is on who makes better music? To my knowledge I have never heard of any of your work but if you're this busy trying to ruffle feathers you obviously are bored which means you lack the technical ability to make anything worthy of listening to.

About ableton; don't put words in my mouth! I said ANY daw has very tedious settings which can alter the end output of a rendered piece of audio. Nice try though.
mfitterer1
quote:
Originally posted by sixofour.604
I don't have an opinion about ableton. The rest of the world thinks it has a bad sound, wether its due to the engine just being , or the developers making it sound like by default, doesn't matter. A large large bulk of people from all skill levels and all backgrounds, agree that ableton has something up with its sound.

Can't argue with the exprienses of legions of people. Unless, like I said before, you want to believe that every person who has ever had this sound problem...all decided in secret one day to lie and make up some large conspiracy about ableton, you have to accept the issue for what it is.


Rationalizing second hand opinions with a strength in numbers approach is a pretty tough sell considering you're dealing with psycho-acoustics.
Nightshift

flutlicht junky
So where' s this torrent link then eh?? :mad:
sixofour.604
quote:
Originally posted by mfitterer1
Rationalizing second hand opinions with a strength in numbers approach is a pretty tough sell considering you're dealing with psycho-acoustics.


The difference in sound isn't Psychoacoustics...its just acoustics. We are not talking about people thinking the sound is different...its already been established that the sound IS in reality, different. Why can't you just accept you love a ty program, and everyone's day will be happier.

About Cubase, sure it may have some hard ware support and multithreading, but every thing else about it is ing archaic. Stienberg needs to come to the 21st century.

Ive never seen a bunch of kids get so mad when they are punched in the face with so much truth. :)
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 
Privacy Statement