return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 
Please torrent FL Studio.. (pg. 18)
View this Thread in Original format
EgosXII
quote:
Originally posted by Aesthetic
yeah.. i can tell you right now:

who's on your page - you
who's not - everyone else


hahaha too right
Nightshift
quote:
Originally posted by mfitterer1
Took the words out of my mouth. Apparently he was holding out hope someone would stand up for him. Not in this lifetime.


LOLWUT? I BELIEVE EVERY WORD HE SAYS, YOU ALL SHOULD TOO BECAUSE THEN MAYBE YOU WOULD LEARN SOME LOGIC AND ACTUALLY GET YOUR MUSIC SIGNED AND BECOME HUGE PRODUCERS IN THE SCENE ON FL STUDIO!

P.S. I ALSO BELIEVE THE WORLD IS FLAT!
mfitterer1
quote:
Originally posted by Nightshift
P.S. I ALSO BELIEVE THE WORLD IS FLAT!


Nobody has proven it is round; it's all proJeCtIon oPions, DuRrRRR

In all seriousness Cron; this forum wouldn't be the same without you. Now whether that is good or bad is up for debate lol.
Nightshift
quote:
Originally posted by mfitterer1
Nobody has proven it is round; it's all proJeCtIon oPions, DuRrRRR


YEAH BUT EVERYBODY HAS PROVED ABLETON LIVES SOUND ENGINE SUCKS.

AND EVERYBODY HAS PROOF THAT FL STUDIO IS BETTER THAN IT AND CUBASE.

CMOOOON MAN GET WITH THE PICTURE!
sixofour.604
Someone stand up for me on TA? Lol.

That is like if someone went to a church, told everyone they are wrong, and expected someone to stand up for him.

TA is exactly the same. So No, I don't expect anyone to stand up for me, because like the guy in the church, I am among imbecils and morons. Do you know how you win against morons? You go, you tell them the truth, they either except it or they don't. If they do, hey, good for them, if not, they are a moron and people are none the wiser. Either way, I win.

My being right is not dependant on how many agree with me at the time, I'm not a sheep.
Mr.Mystery
quote:
Originally posted by sixofour.604
My being right is not dependant on how many agree with me at the time, I'm not a sheep.

This coming from a person who thinks something is true because other people said so.
sixofour.604
quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
This coming from a person who thinks something is true because other people said so.


You think the greeks existed because other people said so.
Mr.Mystery
quote:
Originally posted by sixofour.604
You think the greeks existed because other people said so.

Erm... what?
sixofour.604
quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
Erm... what?


Lol, Now we know who isn't on the same page.

You are bashing the word of mouth transfer of information, but 95% of your knowledge is based on word of mouth. Have you ever been to Taiwan? Probably not, so the only way you know it exists is by word of mouth...because some others say it exists, so you believe it exists. You've likely never been to Chile, the Oval Office in D.C., and you have not met Issac Newton, Plato, nor have you ever liekly seen a Minke Whale off the coast of australia. You have probably never been to Australia, you have probably never even been to scotland, you have probably never seen a nuclear explosion, and you most certainly have not met Charles Darwin, Hemmingway or Jules Vern, you have never been to space, so you don't know if there is no air, the list just goes on and on and all of these things ive listed, you only know they exist by word of mouth. That is infact the most reliable source you have. Other people said they existed, so you accept.

So do you really want to bash the facility of narration? Because it won't get you anywhere.
Mr.Mystery
quote:
Originally posted by sixofour.604
Lol, Now we know who isn't on the same page.

You are bashing the word of mouth transfer of information, but 95% of your knowledge is based on word of mouth. Have you ever been to Taiwan? Probably not, so the only way you know it exists is by word of mouth...because some others say it exists, so you believe it exists. You've likely never been to Chile, the Oval Office in D.C., and you have not met Issac Newton, Plato, nor have you ever liekly seen a Minke Whale off the coast of australia. You have probably never been to Australia, you have probably never even been to scotland, you have probably never seen a nuclear explosion, and you most certainly have not met Charles Darwin, Hemmingway or Jules Vern, you have never been to space, so you don't know if there is no air, the list just goes on and on and all of these things ive listed, you only know they exist by word of mouth. That is infact the most reliable source you have. Other people said they existed, so you accept.

So do you really want to bash the facility of narration? Because it won't get you anywhere.

Your logic baffles me, it really does. Are you saying no images or video material of, say, Australia exists? Or that the people I've met from there vanish into thin air as soon as they disappear from my line of sight?

Not only does your logic make no sense whatsoever, it also has nothing at all to do with anything.
I was laughing at you for claiming not to be a sheep, yet accepting statements of other people as facts without even asking for any proof. If that's not being a sheep, what the is?

sixofour.604
I can photoshop any image or video. Infact, fake images and video are more often then not, used to fool people into thinking something exists in a certain way. As for one or two people they can simply lie. When it comes to information not proven with logic and reason, then statisticly, the more people who say something is a certain way, then the likelyhood that it is that way, increases. I know China exists, because millions of people say it exists, its is extremely unlikely [id say impossiable] that all of those millions of people would agree to lie and say a country called china exists.

Video or images or audio can be invented by anyone. And by one person. So naturally I would say word of mouth by multiple channels is more reliable than any video or images ive seen. Infact, there is not a more reliable method of transmission that we have than word of mouth.
Mr.Mystery
quote:
Originally posted by sixofour.604
I can photoshop any image or video. Infact, fake images and video are more often then not, used to fool people into thinking something exists in a certain way. As for one or two people they can simply lie. When it comes to information not proven with logic and reason, then statisticly, the more people who say something is a certain way, then the likelyhood that it is that way, increases. I know China exists, because millions of people say it exists, its is extremely unlikely [id say impossiable] that all of those millions of people would agree to lie and say a country called china exists.

Video or images or audio can be invented by anyone. And by one person. So naturally I would say word of mouth by multiple channels is more reliable than any video or images ive seen. Infact, there is not a more reliable method of transmission that we have than word of mouth.

So what are your views on 9/11?
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 
Privacy Statement