|
bioethics - what is morally acceptable? (pg. 13)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Kismet7
more convenient cancer marketing. 50 Cent has gone from 214 lbs to 160 lbs for a role in a movie about Cancer. They neeedzz moooar marketingz of Cancer to them black folk, mach easier to spread the disease if you build awareness and social acceptance, while on the flip side asking for money. These are intelligent forms of psychological marketing, both the advertisement and this upcoming film.
http://www.examiner.com/x-22153-Cle...all-Apart-movie |
So its your contention that cancer isn’t real? |
|
|
| Kismet7 |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
So its your contention that cancer isn’t real? |
Now you're throwing me some Orwellian newspeak?
I never said Cancer is not real, I said cancer to some amount is implemented by the businesses that benefit off its existence, in the controlled form of giving people cancer. Does Cancer exist outside of this? Of course, the question is to what extent are Cancer cases natural phenonomenon, and to what extent is it imposed/given to people for the benefit of the businesses involved. |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by Kismet7
I never said Cancer is not real, I said cancer to some amount is implemented by the businesses that benefit off its existence, in the controlled form of giving people cancer. Does Cancer exist outside of this? Of course, the question is to what extent are Cancer cases natural phenonomenon, and to what extent is it imposed/given to people for the benefit of the businesses involved. |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Look, Kismet, if someone found a cure for all those kinds of cancer they mentioned, or just 10% of them, the money they would earn as a result would be far more relevant (because you can cure a single person multiple times) than an "everlasting research" that isn't supposed to go anywhere and depends on donation. |
And do you really disagree with this? If you do, why would it be more profitable to kill someone who could help you make more money in the future? |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Kismet7
Now you're throwing me some Orwellian newspeak?
I never said Cancer is not real, I said cancer to some amount is implemented by the businesses that benefit off its existence, in the controlled form of giving people cancer. Does Cancer exist outside of this? Of course, the question is to what extent are Cancer cases natural phenonomenon, and to what extent is it imposed/given to people for the benefit of the businesses involved. |
:stongue: :stongue: :stongue: :stongue: :stongue: :stongue: :stongue: |
|
|
| Kismet7 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
And do you really disagree with this? If you do, why would it be more profitable to kill someone who could help you make more money in the future? |
Because...of the depolutionist ideal they have. Even Aaron Russo said he thinks the world is overpopulated, when Rockefeller told him they want to depopulate the world population by half, but he said his concious would not let him join in on it. How it is setup now, instead of finding cures and making money off only cures, which would result in short treatments and less money, that they are making money off the endless search for cures. Whether it is taxpayer money they give themselves, or the donation money they rake in.
In return, selling temporary cures in which people are in this long "fighting to stay alive" mode. Some get cured, most dont. So there is an added benefit of depopulating, killing off people through a disease that people have no control over avoiding. Logically, finding cures would actually cut their treatment lengths short, they'd make less money, and depopulation would not take place. You have to understand man has its faults, those faults being put to use here, with the rewards that fill pockets and ideals.
You think the recent Swine Flu is natural phenomomenon in which millions of vaccines were made to be given to people? It was heavily backed by WHO and it was suppose to be the next depopulationist disease. |
|
|
| idoru |
| quote: | Originally posted by Kismet7
You have to understand man has its faults, those faults being put to use here, with the rewards that fill pockets and ideals. |
Are you unwilling to acknowledge that, because man has its faults, cancer might be really ing hard to cure? You're not a doctor, you're not a scientist, so who the are you to say that it's primarily a money-making business as opposed to a prevention business? |
|
|
| nefardec |
kismet, i am usually the anti-technology, anti-education, anti-establishment spiritual nutjob in these threads, and if i'm telling you you're making an ass of yourself, you might want to reconsider what you're saying.
and no, i am not being held hostage in an undisclosed location and being dictated to as i type this sobbing.
*BAM!!! my head falls off and tiny robots spill out from my neck to infiltrate the next victim and turn him into a hopeless, despicable, educated sheep* |
|
|
| Kismet7 |
| quote: | Originally posted by idoru
Are you unwilling to acknowledge that, because man has its faults, cancer might be really ing hard to cure? You're not a doctor, you're not a scientist, so who the are you to say that it's primarily a money-making business as opposed to a prevention business? |
Right, and a decorated Scientist who has made countless cures said that he stumbled upon cancer and aids virus that were put into Vaccines. Why do I have to be the scientist? Poor logic. |
|
|
| Kismet7 |
| quote: | Originally posted by nefardec
kismet, i am usually the anti-technology, anti-education, anti-establishment spiritual nutjob in these threads, and if i'm telling you you're making an ass of yourself, you might want to reconsider what you're saying.
and no, i am not being held hostage in an undisclosed location and being dictated to as i type this sobbing.
*BAM!!! my head falls off and tiny robots spill out from my neck to infiltrate the next victim and turn him into a hopeless, despicable, educated sheep* |
you mad? :stongue:
Why would you have to be at an undisclosed location to be a shill? You can be one from the confort of your own home, i'm sure they prefer hermits. Not that I think you are one, a hermit that is :p |
|
|
| idoru |
| If I've learned anything from this thread, it's that the fact that Kismet made it this far in life completely disproves the concept of natural selection. |
|
|
| Kismet7 |
| quote: | Originally posted by idoru
If I've learned anything from this thread, it's that the fact that Kismet made it this far in life completely disproves the concept of natural selection. |
pottle. kettle. ;) |
|
|
|
|
