|
Cats and Dogs in China - WTF Story of the Day (pg. 15)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| w_ashley |
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
William is just Malkavian. Respect that he suffers enough. |
ad hominem.
Also there is no suffering in my life, I'm pretty content person ongoing. It is people like you though that really remind me how ed up the world is. It is beyond my control though, I can only hope you wake up someday and clue in that petty personal attacks against others doesn't advance yourself in the long run, it will bring you down. You can't escape your judgement, it will find you if you ever turn into a human rather than living life as a slug. There is far more to appreciate in life once you can rise above subhuman behaviour. |
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| You're right, teach me how to be more like you, for that is the way. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| Ad hominem ad hominem ad hominem fact is fact is fact is. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
There is far more to appreciate in life once you can rise above subhuman behaviour. |
such as eating rotting flesh from dead creatures you find randomly on your travels? |
|
|
| w_ashley |
Joss you only make the point that if you keep things in context they make sense, but when you take them out of context they don't.
Eg. people thinking I'm nuts becuase I collect things from the wild may be a viewpoint, but if that viewpoint is used to imprison someone indefinately, is it really reasonable for them to push the view?
What about someone growing their hair out when they are male, is this reason enough to imprison someone indefinately.
What about haaving their own religious worldview? Are people entitled to have their own beleif in god? Or a world view of what are good morals or ethics?
--- And yes ---- the fact is --- that my world view is not an offensive one, it is one that lets people live their life.
What the above was talking about were two things.
1. The fact that a peaceful person who is harassed and attacked without valid cause only has two options to be harassed and attacked or to confront their aggressors. The first statement is just a relay of that idea. In your little blurb though, you take that out of context and make it seem just this mindless rant. There is a background to the statement you are ommitting.
2. The second one was talking about religious beleifs and it is out of context - religious beleifs tend to seem nutty to anyone who doesn't follow that faith anyway. Like slitting cows necks, bathing in only one river, only letting vultures eat the meat of your deceased loved ones, living on a gaint turtle, sacrificing your first born, or a live horse in a giant bonfire, bathing in running water and not going around anyone if you have sex, etc..
All of these things have reasons though, but you won't understand them unless you learn the background.
You've been painting me as "some mad freak" for over 5 years now. You got to understand that someday you will be accountable. As stated your past actions don't just disappear. It is lifelong. |
|
|
| ChemEnhanced |
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
Joss you only make the point that if you keep things in context they make sense, but when you take them out of context they don't.
Eg. people thinking I'm nuts becuase I collect things from the wild may be a viewpoint, but if that viewpoint is used to imprison someone indefinately, is it really reasonable for them to push the view?
What about someone growing their hair out when they are male, is this reason enough to imprison someone indefinately.
What about haaving their own religious worldview? Are people entitled to have their own beleif in god? Or a world view of what are good morals or ethics?
--- And yes ---- the fact is --- that my world view is not an offensive one, it is one that lets people live their life.
What the above was talking about were two things.
1. The fact that a peaceful person who is harassed and attacked without valid cause only has two options to be harassed and attacked or to confront their aggressors. The first statement is just a relay of that idea. In your little blurb though, you take that out of context and make it seem just this mindless rant. There is a background to the statement you are ommitting.
2. The second one was talking about religious beleifs and it is out of context - religious beleifs tend to seem nutty to anyone who doesn't follow that faith anyway. Like slitting oows necks, bathing in only one river, only letting vultures eat the meat of your deceased loved ones, living on a gaint turtle, sacrificing your first born, bathing in running water and not going around anyone if you have sex, etc..
All of these things have reasons though, but you won't understand them unless you learn the background.
You've been painting me as "some mad freak" for over 5 years now. You got to understand that someday you will be accountable. As stated your past actions don't just disappear. It is lifelong. |
 |
|
|
| EddieZilker |
| quote: | Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
|
Classic!!! :stongue: :stongue: :stongue: |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| I can't believe my tax dollars go to fund this sort of . |
|
|
| EddieZilker |
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
Joss you only make the point that if you keep things in context they make sense, but when you take them out of context they don't.
Eg. people thinking I'm nuts becuase I collect things from the wild may be a viewpoint, but if that viewpoint is used to imprison someone indefinately, is it really reasonable for them to push the view?
What about someone growing their hair out when they are male, is this reason enough to imprison someone indefinately.
What about haaving their own religious worldview? Are people entitled to have their own beleif in god? Or a world view of what are good morals or ethics?
--- And yes ---- the fact is --- that my world view is not an offensive one, it is one that lets people live their life.
What the above was talking about were two things.
1. The fact that a peaceful person who is harassed and attacked without valid cause only has two options to be harassed and attacked or to confront their aggressors. The first statement is just a relay of that idea. In your little blurb though, you take that out of context and make it seem just this mindless rant. There is a background to the statement you are ommitting.
2. The second one was talking about religious beleifs and it is out of context - religious beleifs tend to seem nutty to anyone who doesn't follow that faith anyway. Like slitting cows necks, bathing in only one river, only letting vultures eat the meat of your deceased loved ones, living on a gaint turtle, sacrificing your first born, or a live horse in a giant bonfire, bathing in running water and not going around anyone if you have sex, etc..
All of these things have reasons though, but you won't understand them unless you learn the background.
You've been painting me as "some mad freak" for over 5 years now. You got to understand that someday you will be accountable. As stated your past actions don't just disappear. It is lifelong. |
 |
|
|
| ChemEnhanced |
| we should start a pool to see when William finally snaps for good. |
|
|
| EddieZilker |
| quote: | Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
we should start a pool to see when William finally snaps for good. |
I'm putting my money on September of 2004. |
|
|
|
|
