|
Negative and Positive Energy? (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Cynical or depressed people will just dismiss those who want to talk about sunshine and puppies all the time as self-deluded, shallow, clueless, or boring. |
Actually, I'm a romantic idealist (rather than a cynical and depressed pessimist), but the consequences of this are borderline irresponsible. Once you think "energy" can affect otherwise indifferent and neutral objects, such as water, you're on a slippery slope and bound to say that stuff like homoeopathy and prayer work... when they're clearly no better than placebo. |
|
|
| Theresa |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
I hate it with a linguistic passion.
Bloody Emoto is just trying to give all the kotodama nonsense some scientific credibility.
Actually, this thread reminds me that I want to make a similar blind test with my gullible mother who believes this stuff passionately. For example, she sent me once the picture of two "sealed" bottles of rice: In one of them the word "Love" was written on a label, and the other bottle had the word "Hate" on it. Thanks to the almighty power of energy, the rice in the hate bottle was full of fungi, whereas the love bottle was white and clean (which means to me that life develops on hate, but she sort of reached a different conclusion).
I proposed to make a blind test in which I'd give her 6 bottles, 6 words in Japanese (which she doesn't understand) with the words "Love", "Hate", "Life", "Death", "Rice" and "Horse" so she could fill the bottles with rice, seal them and then - as she wished - apply the label randomly to the bottles (as she doesn't understand what the funny drawings are all about anyway).
Actually, I should print the labels already... |
I have read a lot of nay-sayers who argue that this needs to be done to prove it one way or the other, but I think that it defeats the purpose (not saying I believe in the experiment). The idea is that the negative energy directed toward the rice/water creates the result. If there is no energy directed toward the jars because the words mean nothing to the observer, then it wont work.
I think to test it properly, it needs to be in a controlled environment. Everything sterilized equally, rice distributed equally, water frozen equally etc. etc. There are a lot of variables - ice crystals form in different shapes dependent on the temperature in which they froze, the rice that was sitting at the top of the pot is exposed to air longer and more likely to have developed bacteria etc. etc. However, the observer not knowing which jar is which will make the entire point of the experiment null. |
|
|
| MrJiveBoJingles |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Actually, I'm a romantic idealist, but the consequences of this are borderline irresponsible. Once you think "energy" can affect otherwise indifferent and neutral objects, such as water, you're on a slippery slope and bound to say that stuff like homoeopathy and prayer work... when they're clearly no better than placebo. |
I agree. I was responding to the Pie / Theresa exchange, not to you. |
|
|
| MrJiveBoJingles |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
I have read a lot of nay-sayers who argue that this needs to be done to prove it one way or the other, but I think that it defeats the purpose (not saying I believe in the experiment). The idea is that the negative energy directed toward the rice/water creates the result. If there is no energy directed toward the jars because the words mean nothing to the observer, then it wont work. |
But there is no evidence that energy of any sort is even being directed at all. The use of the term "energy" in theories like this is metaphorical, not literal and physical. When people mix these two up, they start expecting a physical effect to pop out of simple emotional investment (metaphorical "energy"). |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
I have read a lot of nay-sayers who argue that this needs to be done to prove it one way or the other, but I think that it defeats the purpose (not saying I believe in the experiment). The idea is that the negative energy directed toward the rice/water creates the result. If there is no energy directed toward the jars because the words mean nothing to the observer, then it wont work. |
Of course they do, because the experimenter wants it to happen, so he may (unconsciously) be more careful with one of the bottles.
It's like saying that I'm hot stuff and that I will only attract people that I find attractive, and offering as a proof that I've never had a relationship with someone I wasn't attracted to. Why, of course, I wouldn't even put any effort in a relationship with someone I fancy, let alone pursue any sort of stability so I could call it a proper relationship :p
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
I think to test it properly, it needs to be in a controlled environment. Everything sterilized equally, rice distributed equally, water frozen equally etc. etc. There are a lot of variables - ice crystals form in different shapes dependent on the temperature in which they froze, the rice that was sitting at the top of the pot is exposed to air longer and more likely to have developed bacteria etc. etc. However, the observer not knowing which jar is which will make the entire point of the experiment null. |
Ideally yes. But I'm willing to have gay passionate bonking sessions with Emoto if, as he and my mother would predict, only the rice in the bottles with the words "Hate" and "Death" went stale. It'd be too much of a fluke! |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
But there is no evidence that energy of any sort is even being directed at all. The use of the term "energy" in theories like this is metaphorical, not literal and physical. When people mix these two up, they start expecting a physical effect to pop out of simple emotional investment (metaphorical "energy"). |
Hence why I hate it on linguistic grounds.
Physical energy != metaphorical energy, and this neohippie science mixes both up all the time because, according to Quantum physics, everything is made up of energy. |
|
|
| Lira |
It's funny how the oddest things get me riled up :p
But, yeah, I'm so angry I'm going to triple post! Raaaarrr!!!! :mad: |
|
|
| kadomony |
| This thread is so negative! Please delete it. |
|
|
| EddieZilker |
| quote: | Originally posted by kadomony
This thread is so negative! Please delete it. |
You've only made it worse. |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by EddieZilker
You've only made it worse. |
That's because opposites attract. Soon the positive energy will be pulled to this thread by all this concentrated negativity and... and... I'm not sure what happens next. |
|
|
| Beats and Beeps |
Have you guys heard of this book called THE SECRET?
it was on OPRAH
i dont wanna spoil the plot but IT TELLS YOU THE SECRET TO LIFE! |
|
|
| EddieZilker |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
That's because opposites attract. Soon the positive energy will be pulled to this thread by all this concentrated negativity and... and... I'm not sure what happens next. |
It will be devastating. Yin and Yang will collapse into a spectacular singularity and instead of any positive or negative energy there will only be an absence of any such emotion constituting either.
From a safe distance, however, the view will be spectacular. The only problem is that one will have to look inward as neither positive or negative "energy" is visible. |
|
|
|
|
