|
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords reportedly shot point blank in head (pg. 6)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| ziptnf |
| quote: | | Originally posted by DJ Robben |
Heavy, man... |
|
|
| tubularbills |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Oh, wait, just found them under my bed. The government must've put them there to hurt my credibility :whip: |
:stongue: :stongue: |
|
|
| Kismet7 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moongoose
I can already see the scene after Kismet goes on a shooting rampage against the goverment, the whole of TA will be invited to a studio just so we will be able to say in unison "We always knew he would do it". |
If you know my life philosophies (which you don't), it would make no logical or behavioural sense. But given the precedent they are setting through this guy and others like him, they are creating some sort of possibility, that anyone can be him, through creating similarites between him and you or anyone.
So what you say, is not far from the precedent they are trying to create with these events. People who read certain books, who are philosophical, who don't believe aspects of the government or the stories they tell. Anyone basically. They're creating precedent that anyone can be stupid enough to do what he did, simply by having similar views on a few things or having read similar books or whatever else they're trying to drive home as a reason for why people do bat insane like going on shooting rampage. The underlying psy op is that "dont talk about government or watch what you say or do about government, because now you fit the outline of X bat shooter." And that makes the average person wary about what they say about government, because most people have read the books hes read, dont believe in govt to an extent, are philsophical and the other aspects of this persons story. |
|
|
| Kismet7 |
| quote: | Originally posted by chlola
:stongue: |
an alt/shill is laughin....boohooo? |
|
|
| Joss Weatherby |
| quote: | Originally posted by Kismet7
If you know my life philosophies (which you don't), it would make no logical or behavioural sense. But given the precedent they are setting through this guy and others like him, they are creating some sort of possibility, that anyone can be him, through creating similarites between him and you or anyone.
So what you say, is not far from the precedent they are trying to create with these events. People who read certain books, who are philosophical, who don't believe aspects of the government or the stories they tell. Anyone basically. They're creating precedent that anyone can be stupid enough to do what he did, simply by having similar views on a few things or having read similar books or whatever else they're trying to drive home as a reason for why people do bat insane like going on shooting rampage. The underlying psy op is that "dont talk about government or watch what you say or do about government, because now you fit the outline of X bat shooter." And that makes the average person wary about what they say about government, because most people have read the books hes read, dont believe in govt to an extent, are philsophical and the other aspects of this persons story. |
So you are a sheeple that won't put up any sort of resistance. If its so clear to you, why aren't you taking a stand? :conf: |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by Kismet7
They're creating precedent that anyone can be stupid enough to do what he did, simply by having similar views on a few things or having read similar books or whatever else they're trying to drive home as a reason for why people do bat insane like going on shooting rampage. |
No, they're not. It's been said over and over again that he's an exceptional case... Otherwise the American people would probably treat Muslims and conspiracy theorists alike now.
I imagine you have the best of intentions when you claim the government did something hideous. Like in the disappearance of my socks, however, the government isn't always behind something even though it logically could (I can't know the whereabouts of my beloved white socks when I'm looking away), because it's either unlikely or something that could only be planned in hindsight, but it couldn't as it happened. If you think about it more carefully, a fatalist Christian could say Loughner went on a shooting spree because God wanted Americans to come together and, all else being equal, she was going to die in a car accident the next day anyway; a Marxist could well say that this was due to the political oppression of the bourgeoisie who framed a member of the "intelligentsia" so the proletarians remain dumb and uneducated. All you need is a bit of imagination and I could even say Oprah did it to boost her audience rates.
That's why we can't take this argument seriously now. Why can't he have acted against the government (rather than with it) like Timothy McVeigh? What's the difference between them? Mind you, if you believe both were puppets and the government is one giant puppeteer, it's time you tell us how we can tell apart someone who acted on behalf of the government from someone who just went mental. |
|
|
| The17sss |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lews
Clearly someone who was insane who fell for Palin and Co's . Probably thought he was doing something good. |
You people are hilarious saying stupid like this and posting pictures of "target maps". Democrats have also used crosshairs and bulls-eye imagery in their own political communications, including one in Arizona “targeting” J. D Hayworth of Arizona in 2010. Exhibit A from the Democrat Leadership Committee's website in 2004:
http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?cont...d=127&subid=171
Remember when the Fort Hood shooting happened... you know, when the crazy Muslim officer yelled "Allah Akbar" and mowed down 12 people? Well this is what you fags on the Left were like:
| quote: | Gen. Wesley Clark: "The important thing is for everyone not to jump to conclusions"
CNN's Jane Velez-Mitchell: "We cannot jump to conclusions. We have to make sure that we do not jump to any conclusions whatsoever.
Former CIA officer Robert Baer (Democrat): "I'm on Pentagon chat room. Right now, there’s messages going back and forth, saying do not jump to the conclusion this had anything to do with Islam."
Obama: "I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we have all the facts."
Time Magazine's Mark Halperin: "We urge for a transparent investigation into the shootings so the American people don’t jump to conclusions." |
ing sad when radical Islam gets the benefit of the doubt over Americans.
OLD: Tea Partiers are elderly white people who hate anyone of color and wave flags all over the place.
NEW: Tea Partiers are young deranged college students who rave about government mind control, kill white people, and post videos of flags burning.
More about the shooter Loughner:
-Favorite books included Mein Kampf, Communist Manifesto, and Siddhartha... CHECK!
-Favorite tagged video on YouTube was watching a U.S. flag burn... CHECK!
-Killed a Republican appointed federal judge... CHECK!
-Described by friend Caitlin Parker as "quite liberal, left wing, and obsessed with the 2012 prophecy"... Chuuuu-ECK!
Yep, sounds like Sarah Palin and right wing extremists!
| quote: | Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
Knowing Beck, he will call for more violence. :p |
I think sick s like you, Nou, pray for things like this to happen so you can go all reactionary and scream "teabaggers are to blame!" What does it say about you as a person that you continually seize on any horrible tragedy to score political points? You are truly a shameless bottom feeder. |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
Favorite books included Mein Kampf, Communist Manifesto, and Siddhartha... CHECK!
Yep, sounds like Sarah Palin |
Given his inconsistency (Mein Kampf + Communist Manifesto), it sort of does :D |
|
|
| The17sss |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Given his inconsistency (Mein Kampf + Communist Manifesto), it sort of does :D |
Well the Congresswoman was Jewish... did you know that? Either way, the point is, the kid was a total lunatic- this has nothing to do with talk radio, health care bills, the political climate, or either political party. He was just a crazy bent on killing some high profile people. |
|
|
| EddieZilker |
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
You people are hilarious saying stupid like this and posting pictures of "target maps". Democrats have also used crosshairs and bulls-eye imagery in their own political communications, including one in Arizona “targeting” J. D Hayworth of Arizona in 2010. Exhibit A from the Democrat Leadership Committee's website in 2004:
http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?cont...d=127&subid=171
Remember when the Fort Hood shooting happened... you know, when the crazy Muslim officer yelled "Allah Akbar" and mowed down 12 people? Well this is what you fags on the Left were like:
ing sad when radical Islam gets the benefit of the doubt over Americans.
OLD: Tea Partiers are elderly white people who hate anyone of color and wave flags all over the place.
NEW: Tea Partiers are young deranged college students who rave about government mind control, kill white people, and post videos of flags burning.
More about the shooter Loughner:
-Favorite books included Mein Kampf, Communist Manifesto, and Siddhartha... CHECK!
-Favorite tagged video on YouTube was watching a U.S. flag burn... CHECK!
-Killed a Republican appointed federal judge... CHECK!
-Described by friend Caitlin Parker as "quite liberal, left wing, and obsessed with the 2012 prophecy"... Chuuuu-ECK!
Yep, sounds like Sarah Palin and right wing extremists!
I think sick s like you, Nou, pray for things like this to happen so you can go all reactionary and scream "teabaggers are to blame!" What does it say about you as a person that you continually seize on any horrible tragedy to score political points? You are truly a shameless bottom feeder. |
Well, it's good to see the Right Wing spin doctors are keeping you prepared to refute what is ostensibly a Right Wing problem. |
|
|
|
|
