|
FAO: Drug Users | MESSAGE: Please boycott foreign drugs or overdose already. Thanks! (pg. 14)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Halcyon+On+On |
| Not quite true. MURDERERS often give a unique insight. |
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
"The plan"? Stoners can barely repel a stupid law, let alone devise a plan to keep the world's 7th biggest economy down! :conf: |
DO HO HO HOOOOO! |
|
|
| enydo |
| quote: | Originally posted by srussell0018
This was a good thread until Austin. |
Yup. |
|
|
| srussell0018 |
| Oh the IRONY |
|
|
| enydo |
| quote: | Originally posted by srussell0018
Oh the IRONY |
Yup. |
|
|
| MSZ |
| I dont need drugs to enjoy the power of trance through GOD. Can I Get an amen? |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lilith
You probably should stop buying computers and smart phones then because the Tantalum in them comes mostly from central African countries with human rights abuses and civil wars that make the bad things that happen in Mexico look like a school yard punch up. Then the material gets shipped to China where its refined and processed into the final components under what is essentially indentured serf labour in corporate compounds, because you don't want to pay three to four times more than if it was made to any semblance of ethical standards.
Your sneakers are probably made by child labourers in Asia that have to work instead of going to school and getting an education, you should probably stop buying them as well.
But you probably wont. |
Oh that Lilith, is there nothing she can't do?!  |
|
|
| Vector A |
I dunno, throwing up one's hands and just not bothering with any moral battles at all (since fighting all of them effectively would be impossible) strikes me as even worse than addressing one or two of them selectively.
Unless her argument is "There are worse things happening, so how about addressing those first?" But that was not how I read it. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| You would!! |
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vector A
I dunno, throwing up one's hands and just not bothering with any moral battles at all (since fighting all of them effectively would be impossible) strikes me as even worse than addressing one or two of them selectively.
Unless her argument is "There are worse things happening, so how about addressing those first?" But that was not how I read it. |
I think it has more to do with the seeming shifting of blame due to association. Those on the moral high horse don't realize that they are not helping anyone at all by blaming drug users for the propagation of misery and crime throughout the world, and Lilith was just issuing examples of how profoundly hypocritical this logic is.
Not only is it hypocritical though, it detracts from the heinousness of the actual murderers and kidnappers, and has no regard for the cycle of addiction that keeps some people as customers. It's victim-blaming to some degree, when the reality is done a great disservice to be so neatly compacted into finger-wagging righteousness. |
|
|
| Vivid Boy |
| I asked my dealer where he got his drugs from he said mexico. I said Good day to you sir. he said the first one is free. I hung back up my jacket |
|
|
|
|
