|
The Awesome Science Thread (pg. 26)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| JEO |
| I really don't give a . I just want him banned. He may post some relevant stuff from time to time, but that's all. It's very little given the amount of bull he posts no-one cares about. |
|
|
| Acton |
| quote: | Originally posted by JEO
I really don't give a . I just want him banned. He may post some relevant stuff from time to time, but that's all. It's very little given the amount of bull he posts no-one cares about. |
I've been absent from the forums recently, so I don't know what's happened, but I will always support logical/factual posts, irrespective of where they come from... friend, foe or even William Ashley. |
|
|
| JEO |
| quote: | Originally posted by Acton
I will always support logical/factual posts |
But will you still credit Lagrangian even when it's just a quote, like every other of his posts?
I really can't tell if he's really interested in certain subjects, or just posting random stuff for the sake of appearing knowledgeable. All in all, he's a total douche for that Obama/USA thing he keeps posting. |
|
|
| srussell0018 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Acton
I will always support logical/factual posts. |
of course you will |
|
|
| Desiderata |
| Lagrangian seems to do well in this Awesome Science Thread and has some grasp on certain things and if Acton agrees as well then that's proof for me. But it's when he clogs up all the other threads with random stuff that doesn't make any sense to anyone but himself. He might be a slightly autistic gay who doesn't really like being gay which is a paradox in itself. |
|
|
| Acton |
| quote: | Originally posted by JEO
But will you still credit Lagrangian even when it's just a quote, like every other of his posts? |
I'm unaware of his current posting habits as I've been occupied with my work recently, but if they're logical, make sense and relevant to the subject, then I see no reason for me to disregard them.... whether they're original or not.
I wasn't necessarily crediting Lagrangian, but I was agreeing with what he said in the previous post, as it was correct (with the exception of the TARDIS stuff, obviously!). |
|
|
| srussell0018 |
| quote: | Originally posted by FuzzQi
You're a tardis |
Nicely done |
|
|
| Cavalier_Hax0rz |
I thought Goedel had proven a Closed Timeline Curve (CTC) which would enable time-travel into the past?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_timelike_curve
If this is what Lagrangian claimed, then he might have (albeit poorly proven) point. |
|
|
| Trance-MB |
| quote: | Originally posted by JEO
Everything this forum needs is Lagrangian and Trance-MB posting in the science thread. Why don't you quote the Daily Mail while you're at it? |
Next time I will quote the message in Dutch.
But maybe you can explain what's wrong with my posts compared to all others. I'm really curious about that. |
|
|
| JEO |
| Oh nothing. I mixed you up. |
|
|
| Trance-MB |
| quote: | Originally posted by JEO
Sorry. I mixed you up. |
Accepted ;) |
|
|
|
|
