Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
not sure if this is new but wasn't this a thing 3-4 years ago ? i don'r really understand the point of minimalism when you aren't really focusing on a groove nd some sort of rhythmic interplay to replace a hook. This one is pretty square.
this was made in 2010
Better production
interesting track despite the lack of melodic elements
I don't really see the point of the track posted if this one was made 5 years ago.
I don't think it would qualifty as filler in that you would typically parse the unicorn stuff with groovy tech stuff which this track dosn't have. I don't really see why someone would play it except that they don't know that it has been done or being done a million times better.
Filler tracks are the most important and hardest tracks to cultivate. I suppose one would have to understand djing for the OP to understand what system j was saying.
God that is a boring track almost put me to sleep.
Not really a fan of it I did finding surprising that Airwave did play it though.
2techs
quote:
Originally posted by TranceElevation
Exactly, the track is boring from every angle. I can't even understand why this would deserve a topic. Ok, Tyas made something unusual, but the track in itself is the ultimate void. Doesn't have groove, direction...and stop putting words in my mouth. Didn't mention anything about trance or melody. That track is just a number.
a la most 2001-2004 progressive house tracks
MSZ
I do not enjoy this slab of EDM.
Looney4Clooney
quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
I pretty much stopped giving a about your opinion on this subject at this statement here.
tyou are the one that pigeonhole's tracks without understanding why something would be considered house or trance. you seemed to find my comparison to your purported understanding that the track i posted is tech house there fore even mentioning or comparing to something that you think is trance is silly. You dso realize that bpm alone would pretty much make this track not trance. You are the one obsessing about genre names because you can't seem to describe music in actual concrete terms.
understandble that my opinion would not mean much to you because you use rhetoric without ever describing what you are talking about using terms that actually mean things. You say driving. I say it isn't. I can describe why it isn't. You can't. And that is why you get so pissed off.
SYSTEM-J
quote:
Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
you seemed to find my comparison to your purported understanding that the track i posted is tech house there fore even mentioning or comparing to something that you think is trance is silly.
Stop trying to write sentences with more than one verb in them. It's utterly painful to read.
quote:
You dso realize that bpm alone would pretty much make this track not trance.
Absolute joke.
Guest
I miss these arguments
Trance-M
quote:
Originally posted by Titanium
God that is a boring track almost put me to sleep.
Sleep? To me it sounds annoying, no way it will put me into sleep.
quote:
Not really a fan of it I did finding surprising that Airwave did play it though.
Why? Don't you think it fits in Airwave's set or are you surprised because Airwave played a Sean Tyas track?
Lews
As one of the few (two?) people in this thread who have actually heard this track played out... it sounds epic on a good system. One of those tracks that you need to hear in it's proper context to fully appreciate, unless you have some (apparently better than average) imagination.
Looney4Clooney
quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Absolute joke.
that bpm is rather integral to how one might classify a genre ? that track is slower than most house tracks. Trance and house share so many things that bpm if anything would be a rather big indicator. Perhaps some working djs on here could opine.
SYSTEM-J
Slower than most house tracks at 126bpm? You are laughable, it's so glaringly obvious you have no experience of clubbing past hard trance circa 2004.
Please, please - working DJs opine whether 126 is slower than most house in 2015.
Trance-M
quote:
Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
that bpm is rather integral to how one might classify a genre ? that track is slower than most house tracks. Trance and house share so many things that bpm if anything would be a rather big indicator. Perhaps some working djs on here could opine.
