|
Honest Reporting (pg. 8)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| hardcore trancer |
BBC is da best channel,it is shame that they got kicked out,now it is gonna be all CNN with their one sided anti palastanian views!:sadgreen:
ooh well at least we have Al Gazeera!! |
|
|
| Galapidate |
| quote: | Originally posted by Viber
News from israel: playboy is in BBC is out!
the israeli goverment is trying in this very days to remove the Nazi
channel "BBc news" becuse of their hypocrite, one sided, and anti israeli pro palastinian reports and specials in the meantime israel will give a hard time for this ass holes
and while the trash is out the gold is in!
the playboy channel is beck!:D |
luck s.o.b.!! :D |
|
|
| Viber |
Cnn are ass holes too the best news channeles are the israeli news channels becuse simply everything is from an objective point of view and with the Sympathy tone that you expect to hear about someone death and things like that (yes palastinians deathes too)
and besides the israeli news channels tells the whole picture and not just one side of it or little part of it |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
| quote: | Originally posted by Viber
Cnn are ass holes too the best news channeles are the israeli news channels becuse simply everything is from an objective point of view and with the Sympathy tone that you expect to hear about someone death and things like that (yes palastinians deathes too)
and besides the israeli news channels tells the whole picture and not just one side of it or little part of it |
Iam sure you are right!!
too bad we dont get the Isreali news channels here.:rolleyes: |
|
|
| Viber |
| quote: | Originally posted by hardcore trancer
Iam sure you are right!!
too bad we dont get the Isreali news channels here.:rolleyes: |
i have no reason to lie about the news channels in israel so dont roll your eyes! you never saw an israeli news channel or understood what they are saying anyway so you really have no base to say that with such sarcastic tone:whip: |
|
|
| DrummeRaver86 |
| quote: | Originally posted by hardcore trancer
BBC is da best channel,it is shame that they got kicked out,now it is gonna be all CNN with their one sided anti palastanian views!:sadgreen:
ooh well at least we have Al Gazeera!! |
Not Gazeera...Jazeera...:rolleyes: And CNN is not exclusively anti-palestinian. Once again, know what you're talking about. |
|
|
| DrummeRaver86 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Viber
Cnn are ass holes too the best news channeles are the israeli news channels becuse simply everything is from an objective point of view and with the Sympathy tone that you expect to hear about someone death and things like that (yes palastinians deathes too)
and besides the israeli news channels tells the whole picture and not just one side of it or little part of it |
This is true. You cannot assume that just because a channel is based in Israel means that they are exclusively pro-Israeli. I do not know how much of the media is censored by the government there, but I am sure that they try and cover all points of view. |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
| quote: | Originally posted by DrummeRaver86
Not Gazeera...Jazeera...:rolleyes: And CNN is not exclusively anti-palestinian. Once again, know what you're talking about. |
it seems like you know everything eh!!too bad we are not perfect like you!!:rolleyes:
and stop telling me what I know,and what I dont know,I have my own opinions,just liek everyone else. |
|
|
| melech_mike |
MILITANT JOURNALISM
On numerous occasions, many have critiqued the media's widespread use of the term "militant" to describe Palestinian terrorists. A Wednesday Washington Post editorial provides an ideal illustration of the precise problem with the term.
The Post editorial repeatedly calls Palestinian terrorist organizations "militant groups," and then — sandwiched among those references — refers to "militant Jewish settlers." The editorial claims these two groups constitute "the extremists on both sides."
As noted by James Taranto's weblog, the term "militant" has two separate dictionary definitions:
1) engaged in warfare or combat
2) aggressively active (as in a cause)
A Hamas leader may be (generously) granted the first definition, and some Jewish settlers fit the second definition. But by calling both groups "militants" in the same editorial breath, the Post entirely eliminates this distinction, and implies equivalence between mass civilian murderers and dwellers on a disputed land.
Would a Washington Post editorial ever equate a militant environmentalist with Osama bin Laden?
Comments to: [email protected][/email]
--- SECURITY FENCE ---
The Atlantic Monthly profiled a Rand Corporation study of "top ten international-security developments that aren't getting the attention they deserve." Heading the list: the security wall that Israel is presently constructing to protect against West Bank terrorist incursions.
Though recognizing that "[t]he logic behind the wall is unassailable," the article claims that the wall could "deepen Palestinian rage and enmity, of course, prompting escalated mortar and ground-to-ground missile attacks against targets inside Israel. The wall could also prompt further attacks on Israelis overseas, like the suicide bombing last November of a Mombasa hotel filled with Israeli tourists and the accompanying attempt to shoot down an Israeli chartered plane."
The Atlantic, it seems, believes it credible to claim that Israel — by attempting to stave off terror against its civilians — bears responsibility for future attacks.
Furthermore, as editorialized in the Jerusalem Post, "Israel is not building the fence, [in effect] the Palestinians are. It took thousands of attacks and dozens of dead before Israel began to contemplate building it, and even now it is being built reluctantly."
Comments to: [email][email protected] |
|
|
| torontotrance |
| but remember that news reporting is biased by the individual who writes it. There is no such thing as an unbiased story..take it with a grain of salt and move on. |
|
|
| melech_mike |
| quote: | Originally posted by torontotrance
but remember that news reporting is biased by the individual who writes it. There is no such thing as an unbiased story..take it with a grain of salt and move on. |
Accountability must be taken when bias reporting on behalf of media agents such as Routers, AP and others who contribute to well over 37,000 individual news outlets. Don't you think some sort of standard must be kept to ensure that the reader is getting the most objective prospective of the news as possible?
News giants such as those named above give a slanted version of the news which in turn gives the reader a false sense of the real story.
Basically, what I’m saying is that if you with the news, you should be shut down. Spreading lies, propaganda, hate, incitement or other fallacies does nothing but make matters worst.
Oh, and Cyrus, you! (Just for fun... I missed you, you know!:rolleyes:) |
|
|
| DrummeRaver86 |
| quote: | Originally posted by hardcore trancer
it seems like you know everything eh!!too bad we are not perfect like you!!:rolleyes:
and stop telling me what I know,and what I dont know,I have my own opinions,just liek everyone else. |
It may seem like that to you, but I have never claimed that I know everything. Quite the contrary, I know that I do not know everything. Just because I post on this forums in an intellectual manner does not mean that I know everything or claim to. In addition, I have never said I am perfect, and I do not believe I am near perfect. It would also be greatly appreciated if you did not pluralize. the "we" should be "I". The people in this forum know that my posts are humble and factual, and I would not pursue something unless I truely see fit.
Also, I have never told you what you do or don't know. All I simply ask is that you "know what you're talking about", meaning please make factual posts. It's fine to post your opinions, but back that up in some way. Don't just jump on a bandwagon without reason.:) |
|
|
|
|
