|
Question for girls. (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Heinz |
a in roach just ran by my foot!!!
im standin up on me couch, HELP!! |
|
|
| TrAnCeAkI |
| i dont really care :P but a little cash doesnt hurt right? :eek: :nervous: |
|
|
| SuckUpMySenses |
| quote: | Originally posted by Emil
Notice barely any girls respond to these threads? This post is a good example. :toothless |
hahaa how funny ! well i'll respond, ok no i wont, nevermind lol. ok.. im not after cars , money or looks, just someone who has a nice , big strong tongue and who doesnt use gel.. who leaves his hair messy !!! thanks.. im done :) |
|
|
| SuckUpMySenses |
| quote: | Originally posted by Heinz
a in roach just ran by my foot!!!
im standin up on me couch, HELP!! |
hahaaaa what is going onnn |
|
|
| SuperFarStucker |
First and foremost "The map is not the territory." Not everyone will agree on any "strict" definition of love. Furthermore, seeking to give it identity only muddles the situation further in my opinion as I don't apply it uniformly. Loving a person is nothing like "loving" an object, or a relative. Just kidding, they are people too... sometimes.
Secondly, Darwin's theory of evolution applies primarily under the conditions of unadultered nature. We don't live in such a society. We have civilized to an extent and pretty nullified evolution.
Look at all the blind/deaf/genetically deformed people in the world. They would not make it past birth in a state of nature. One could also conjecture that our genes are no longer being made stronger through breeding but perhaps weaker in the eyes of "evolution."
You also have to consider that everyone has different goals in life that drive them to do the things they do. Our instincts play a very small role in our actions and our intuition plays a much greater one.
I would suspect culture also plays a HUGE role in each and everyone's definition of loVe. I would say that "money & cars" would be american impact, but perhaps that's just being cynical. We do culturally promote other things, like hot b*tches (kidding...). |
|
|
| IbiZaDreAms |
| :rolleyes: sure your kidding :rolleyes: |
|
|
| anuneventrade |
Every guy I have ever dated has been older than me. The last one that I lived with was 7 years older than me and had his life on track. Owned his own apartment/car, had an excellent job with opportunity for growth within the company, was well educated and had a fantastic family. That to me is just sexy.
In all honesty, I do have standards. But you're lying if you say you don't.
Yes, my men have to be attractive. (Would you date a disgustingly ugly person? Of course not). If I work out and take care of my body, there is no reason why the person I'm dating shouldn't as well.
Yes, my men have to have a job. If I'm working and earning money and saving and paying bills, you do too. Learn responsibility and independence.
Yes, my men have to have a car. I'm lazy, I don't want to drive everywhere, and buses make me sick. I didn't say you had to have the best car in the world, but A car at least. How are you supposed to get to work without a car? (Granted, my last boyfriend did have a Mitsubishi Evo VIII, but that was just a plus. :D)
Yes, my men have to have an edcuation or be in the process of getting one. Knowledge is necessary to get ahead in the world, and it's damn sexy when my man is intelligent. (Last boyfriend worked for NASA)
Yes, my men have to be older. Younger = more immature, less financially stable, more reckless, generally incapable of a real relationship. Around my age is fine, but I rarely date anyone my age or younger. I think the youngest I've gone is two years older than me.
It's a definite plus if he's addicted to trance and politics :clown:
*edit* But in all honesty people, these are common standards of society, not just of women. Do you really know that many people that don't have a job? a car? an education/getting one? I don't know a single person that doesn't have any one of those. |
|
|
| SuperFarStucker |
| quote: | Originally posted by IbiZaDreAms
:rolleyes: sure your kidding :rolleyes: |
Why wouldn't I be? :conf: :conf: :conf: :conf: |
|
|
| SuperFarStucker |
| quote: | Originally posted by anuneventrade
Every guy I have ever dated has been older than me. The last one that I lived with was 7 years older than me and had his life on track. Owned his own apartment/car, had an excellent job with opportunity for growth within the company, was well educated and had a fantastic family. That to me is just sexy.
In all honesty, I do have standards. But you're lying if you say you don't.
Yes, my men have to be attractive. (Would you date a disgustingly ugly person? Of course not). If I work out and take care of my body, there is no reason why the person I'm dating shouldn't as well.
Yes, my men have to have a job. If I'm working and earning money and saving and paying bills, you do too. Learn responsibility and independence.
Yes, my men have to have a car. I'm lazy, I don't want to drive everywhere, and buses make me sick. I didn't say you had to have the best car in the world, but A car at least. How are you supposed to get to work without a car? (Granted, my last boyfriend did have a Mitsubishi Evo VIII, but that was just a plus. :D)
Yes, my men have to have an edcuation or be in the process of getting one. Knowledge is necessary to get ahead in the world, and it's damn sexy when my man is intelligent. (Last boyfriend worked for NASA)
Yes, my men have to be older. Younger = more immature, less financially stable, more reckless, generally incapable of a real relationship. Around my age is fine, but I rarely date anyone my age or younger. I think the youngest I've gone is two years older than me.
It's a definite plus if he's addicted to trance and politics :clown:
*edit* But in all honesty people, these are common standards of society, not just of women. Do you really know that many people that don't have a job? a car? an education/getting one? I don't know a single person that doesn't have any one of those. |
The irony in that statement bemuses me. Initially you state that they must *BE OLDER* than you and THEN You suggest, or rather, imply you are both equals as far as maturity. Now mind you, I'm clued in to the whole "girls mature faster than boys thing." So far as I can tell, however, you're far past that stage - which subsequently makes your attitude rather condescending towards men in general.
Perhaps it's pure coincidence that you've never met a man equal to or lesser than you in age that you consider mature or perhaps its part of a preconceived notion that automatically discounts an individual based on their age. I certainly cannot say with any amount of authority, regardless I felt obliged to shoot down your bull smoke screen.
If you don't date younger guys, fine, but seriously do you think anybody buys that bull? (besides yourself maybe) |
|
|
| Trance-Aqua |
Firstly thanx to those who replied in serious manner.
But you dont really see my point, money , age education,,, etc is like a mask and are personal achievents in life, sure its a very big attraction to us and i wouldnt mind a billionare gf who was the most gorjas girl on earth, but just ask your self, what if that girl/guy you have met, were the exact match for you, you realise that you have finnaly met someone who you feel just right with, they were verry polite, had manners, made you feel like the angel in heaven each time they were just around you and that you would die if they were to ever leave you... BUT they were abit younger than you and were not financialy stable because maybe of some recent tradegy or for other unknow matter, does that mean you would spit in their face and leave ???
Anyone here understands what im getting at ?? Not saying youre all wrong but what if the alternate situation acurs like i have writen above,,, what happens when love will make more sence and will overule the material things ???? Do you simply deny the reality or what ,... |
|
|
| PhloTron |
| quote: | Originally posted by Trance-Aqua
so i thought id ask you girls on here, is it true that you always tend to go or always dream of going for a guy who is older and is rich ??? |
if that load of crap were true, I'd have all the young hotties chasing my ass down...older, professional, driving a 28 million dollar machine, in uniform, etc...
...alas...I'm better off talking with brick walls and barnyard animals, because my finacial stability, maturity, and age don't get me anywhere.
:thepirate :wtf: :sadgreen:
[edit...i dunno how this reply ended up in a completely diff thread earlier..../doh] |
|
|
| smallSHEEP |
The flip side of this is that I wouldn't really want to go out with a girl older than myself. Also, Girls who have had at least a university education and are earning themselves a reasonable salary are defenately more attractive. I also like girls who are worldly wise having traveled, and can appreciate a good resturant etc. Surprising hard to find.
edit : Oh yea, she has to be stunningly attractive too! |
|
|
|
|
