|
Is Ishkur correct on Progressive trance? (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| sandstorm03 |
| quote: | Originally posted by muckluck
Those tracks ARE prog trance, knobhead. Just as much as the tracks in the Detroit Techno section are detroit techno, the chicago house samples are chigaco house, the jump up samples are jump up, AND THAT'S NO JOKE. As most people should know, the samples are one of the few things that AREN'T a joke except in the obviously made up genres.
They should be there and they define the genre. He gave his reasons. What are yours? That it doesn't "sound" like progressive trance? Well let me give you a tip, you don't have a ing clue what progressive trance sounds like any more than you do any other genre invented before 1999. |
::yawn:: someone please take a screen shot of ishkurs Disclamer and post it for me? |
|
|
| JakeC |
 |
|
|
| sandstorm03 |
| quote: | Originally posted by JakeC
|
i owe ya 1 |
|
|
| auranaut |
| quote: | Originally posted by sandstorm03
::yawn:: someone please take a screen shot of ishkurs Disclamer and post it for me? |
So what's your definition of progressive trance? |
|
|
| sandstorm03 |
| quote: | Originally posted by auranaut
So what's your definition of progressive trance? |
I don't define genres cause its useless, and there are to many "inbread" tunes. |
|
|
| Haak |
| quote: | Originally posted by sandstorm03
Thats another tough one cause it really isn't layered more then any other trance. But it has a progressive bassline.
|
lol seriously, any idea how ridiculous that sounds? |
|
|
| Bret Hart |
| quote: | Originally posted by JakeC
|
Yes, it disclaims that what is written is his opinion BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT HIS OPINIONS CAN NOT BE TRUE !!
The orginal poster in this thread, asked to verify this opinion made by Ishkur. IF Ishkur was wrong YOU should explain why and prove it. IF he's right than admit it.
There are SOME facts amongst the satire. |
|
|
| sandstorm03 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Haak
lol seriously, any idea how ridiculous that sounds? |
go ahead and explain please. you have some great productions. |
|
|
| sandstorm03 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Bret Hart
Yes, it disclaims that what is written is his opinion BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT HIS OPINIONS CAN NOT BE TRUE !!
The orginal poster in this thread, asked to verify this opinion made by Ishkur. IF Ishkur was wrong YOU should explain why and prove it. IF he's right than admit it.
There are SOME facts amongst the satire. |
Why should i verify an opinion when he himself said that it is his own personal interpretation. |
|
|
| Haak |
| hehe, too hard to explain, but i wouldn't judge a tune to be trance or progressive trance depending on how many layers it has. and i just thought "it has a progressive bassline" sounded funny. |
|
|
| Bret Hart |
| quote: | Originally posted by sandstorm03
Why should i verify an opinion when he himself said that it is his own personal interpretation. |
If i understand this thread correctly, please correct me if I am wrong, the orginal thread started asked to verify if Ishkurs definition of progressive trance was correct.
Some people responded back saying 'its his opinion, its wrong'
What I am saying is IF ishkur is wrong in his definition PLEASE explain to us noobs why that is. Otherwise, if you can't explain that its false than it should NOT THAN mean its 100% not true, even if its disclaimed as his opinion. |
|
|
| Bret Hart |
for example, I have an opinion that the earth is round.
I disclaim to you its my opinion.
How do you prove my opinion to be true?? Or false???
Answer. you find the facts and either prove or disprove my opinion.
We should approach Ishkurs guide the same way. Either prove or disprove his statments using facts.
In this case, what are the facts ( i.e. the true definition of prog., etc).
I don't know the answer but I am hoping someone does |
|
|
|
|
