|
now what, i got my tegg and other car related stuff (pg. 8)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| nchs09 |
| quote: | Originally posted by TeKnoHe@d2025
I myself own a 1990 Acura Integra GS (an automatic at that). I wouldn't consider it "fast" but it's pretty quick for its year and $20,000 price tag when it was new. Granted it's a little quicker and carbon fiber hood I put on, |
im sure that carbon fiber hood makes it quick huh |
|
|
| Jocker |
| quote: | Originally posted by nchs09
im sure that carbon fiber hood makes it quick huh |
:stongue: :stongue:
(but it does make the car much lighter) |
|
|
| nchs09 |
| quote: | Originally posted by wwu.punisher
omg. and nobody made this connection up until now, including me. how sad. lol. |
i didnt read the whole thread :(
are u being sarcastic? hehe
| quote: | Originally posted by Numb3rJuan
initial d is gay and boring adn fast and furious is so damn.. annoying.
And whats wrong with a skyline? They're fast, but not the fastest. Tell me you wouldn't take one if someone gave it to you.
And who do you talk to that says "jdm is mad tyte yo"? Must be some pretty sad young teenagers talking like that. |
id take a pinto if they gave it to me. tax deduction :D
but i dont pay taxes :( |
|
|
| wwu.punisher |
| quote: | Originally posted by nchs09
i didnt read the whole thread :(
are u being sarcastic? hehe
|
Not at all. Seriously. lol. |
|
|
| nchs09 |
| quote: | Originally posted by wwu.punisher
Not at all. Seriously. lol. |
oh. go me!!! im a genious @ noticing useless . |
|
|
| getfoul |
where did you dyno at, and how do you get traction in a fwd car to get 0-60 in "4.9" when the boost kicks in. Wait a second, without drag radials or slicks that isnt possible. The tires are too skinny and the road is nowhere near sticky enough.
2600 lbs isn't anything impressive. That's a stock saturn, or a fully loaded civic hatchback. I have friends with 1800lb Hondas. Come back with the weight arguement when you are actually "Unloaded."
If you are a web design guru, you'll have access to a scanner. Since you "checked" today that you have 240 HP you will be able to supply the dyno sheet that came with that "proof." |
|
|
| Allannn |
yo i gots me a trippple turbo twin intake valve on my 86 pinto biiiiiaaaaaaatcccccchhh...
yea! friday night drunkfest :stongue: |
|
|
| teegee |
| quote: | Originally posted by wwu.punisher
I nominate this among the threads of the year.
First of all, I believe that I mentioned that my car is "unloaded". For those of you that didn't catch that (i.e. 3,000 lbs. comment), that means that the car doesn't carry as much weight as the typical Camry because of modifications (frame, carbon, etc). In fact, my car weighs almost exactly 2,600 lbs. with me in the driver's seat.
At stock, my car's engine was 130 horsepower. Today, I have a 240 horsepower (checked today) turbo under the hood. With intake, a modified gearbox, upgraded fuel injection, and the light weight, I find it humorous that anyone would dare call bull on me regarding its speed.
If anyone's in the Seattle area and wants to clock it themselves, I'd be willing to bet that I can break 5 seconds again. (Although, as I said, I've only done it once.) |
confused. running 240 or 370 (cause, ya know, thats what a "240hp turbo" means)? while i'm assuming that it's the first, that car still must be such a bitch to drive - torque steer galore, hmm?
also, i'm back to portland this august, and would like nothing more than to see this 4.9 camry. how's that sound? |
|
|
| Unknown DJ |
| All this talk about cars, and yet not one picture. Disapointing :toothless |
|
|
| teegee |
| quote: | Originally posted by Unknown DJ
All this talk about cars, and yet not one picture. Disapointing :toothless |
:p |
|
|
| TranceSpeeder |
:toothless |
|
|
| qwikk |
| quick question... what's a 'cae', cold air entake? |
|
|
|
|
