|
Donnie Darko (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Demoted |
| quote: | Originally posted by Omega_M
If u care, take a look at http://www.themodernword.com/mulholland_drive.html and see to what extent the reviewer has gone to understand the movie
A movie should be entertaining, maybe thought provoking..but wtf such a deep puzzle that u start thinking the director's gone nuts ?? |
David Lynch specifically makes movies such as Mulholland Drive to keep you entertained after the movie is over. He doesn't want you to just sit there for two hours, watch some linear storyline, and be done with it, possibly to never draw out anything about it in the future. Even moreso the case with the movie Lost Highway he directed which literally has no ending. It ends with a car chase, nothing more. The fact that you like movies that begin and end, and follow a relative formula does not mean that movies that break such barriers have no meaning or place. Just like Jackson Pollock and his famous drunken vomit displays are juxtapose to Picasso.
Penis dick lamp cat scat in a mouth of shat. |
|
|
| Theresa |
I really like this movie. The directors cut I think needs to be seen after watching the original.
Anyway, those of you who say it sucks, can you please explain to me what exactly sucked about it (specifically), and enlighten me on the storyline?
I have a sneaking suspicion that those of you who find this movie "sucky", didn't actually get it. |
|
|
| Omega_M |
| quote: | Originally posted by Demoted
David Lynch specifically makes movies such as Mulholland Drive to keep you entertained after the movie is over. He doesn't want you to just sit there for two hours, watch some linear storyline, and be done with it, possibly to never draw out anything about it in the future. Even moreso the case with the movie Lost Highway he directed which literally has no ending. It ends with a car chase, nothing more. The fact that you like movies that begin and end, and follow a relative formula does not mean that movies that break such barriers have no meaning or place. Just like Jackson Pollock and his famous drunken vomit displays are juxtapose to Picasso.
Penis dick lamp cat scat in a mouth of shat. |
IMO this one went over the edge. |
|
|
| Ivand |
| quote: | Originally posted by RapidFire
:stongue:. thats gotta be a joke, right? |
I mean, i know what happens, and how it happens, but its kinda hard to follow |
|
|
| Omega_M |
| quote: | Originally posted by RapidFire
:stongue:. thats gotta be a joke, right? |
it better be :rolleyes: |
|
|
| Demoted |
| quote: | Originally posted by Omega_M
IMO this one went over the edge. |
Dude, there was even softcore lesbos.
I mean, what are you, gay? :p |
|
|
| RapidFire |
| quote: | Originally posted by Ivand
I mean, i know what happens, and how it happens, but its kinda hard to follow |
yeah god forbid movies make us think and pay attention to them. |
|
|
| Omega_M |
| quote: | Originally posted by Demoted
Dude, there was even softcore lesbos.
I mean, what are you, gay? :p |
so u mean u are appreciating the movie because of the lesbo scenes ? |
|
|
| Demoted |
| quote: | Originally posted by Omega_M
so u mean u are appreciating the movie because of the lesbo scenes ? |
It's not like it detracted.
You really are gay. :o :wtf: |
|
|
| Omega_M |
| quote: | Originally posted by Demoted
It's not like it detracted.
You really are gay. :o :wtf: |
looks like ur interested :rolleyes:
IMO this thread is going to be closed soon. Its straying a bit too far from the topic. |
|
|
| Ygrene |
| I always feel bad for Al Pacino in this movie, because he gets powned. |
|
|
| Theresa |
| quote: | Originally posted by RandomGirl
I really like this movie. The directors cut I think needs to be seen after watching the original.
Anyway, those of you who say it sucks, can you please explain to me what exactly sucked about it (specifically), and enlighten me on the storyline?
I have a sneaking suspicion that those of you who find this movie "sucky", didn't actually get it. |
Anyone?!?!? |
|
|
|
|
