|
abu musab al-zarqawi is dead (pg. 6)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| umes23 |
| quote: | Originally posted by tiesto14
yes there was...his name was Hussein. |
cause that's so important when the U.S. in its history (and present) supports and often enables totalitarian regimes....
great reasoning. |
|
|
| Dirichlet |
I found the interview of Michael Berg (father of son Nicholas Berg who was purportedly beheaded by Al-Zarqawi) to be quite interesting...
interview: Michael Berg |
|
|
| tiesto14 |
| quote: | Originally posted by sandstorm03
No any rational person could come up with reasons to go to war.
Definately better reasons then "to kill Osama"
If we wanted him that badly, there are also much simpilar($5.8 Billion cheaper) ways to do so. |
The war isnt just about getting Bin Laden. And i am curious what are YOUR cheaper ways? |
|
|
| tiesto14 |
| quote: | Originally posted by umes23
cause that's so important when the U.S. in its history (and present) supports and often enables totalitarian regimes....
great reasoning. |
Another turtle? Can you lefties stay on topic EVER? You are not even worth talking to. Once i beat you on your above point you will then come back at me with something the US did in 1970. There is no hope for someone like yourself. |
|
|
| sandstorm03 |
| quote: | Originally posted by tiesto14
The war isnt just about getting Bin Laden. And i am curious what are YOUR cheaper ways? |
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/08/19/taliban.documents/
| quote: |
Talk of assassination
During a meeting between Ahmed and Eastham on November 28, 1998, just days after the Taliban's supreme court cleared bin Laden of terrorist activities, Ahmed said one possibility "would be for the U.S. to kill him or arrange for bin Laden to be assassinated."
Ahmed "said that the U.S., if it chose to do so, could arrange to have bin Laden killed by cruise missiles or other means, and there would be little the Taliban could do to prevent it," according to the documents.
Another alternative, Ahmed said, would be for the United States to provide the Taliban with cruise missiles to have "the situation resolved in this way." Ahmed also noted that expelling bin Laden likely would result in the Taliban regime being overthrown, according to the documents.
And while Ahmed suggested a possible assassination of bin Laden, he also "urged the U.S. not to bomb Afghanistan again" as Washington did in the weeks following the embassy bombings. Ahmed "asked instead for a new U.S. proposal aimed at resolving the matter," the documents said. |
Do you believe Cnn? |
|
|
| umes23 |
| and you're an ignorant righty. this point applies today. if you can't think of where you have no knowledge of the world! i can agree on the waste of time part, so i'll stop responding to you as well :wtf: |
|
|
| tiesto14 |
yes i do....but blame Clinton for that mistake. |
|
|
| Greedy |
well even though there will be others trying to take his place, this dude WAS the head guy so that itself is important. No one really knows whats going to happen because you can say is just gonna get worse, or you can also say that AQ will just be disorganized.
but even though there will be others trying to take his place, if they go about doing stuff al-zarqawi did, we'll get them too. |
|
|
| tiesto14 |
| quote: | Originally posted by umes23
and you're an ignorant righty. this point applies today. if you can't think of where you have no knowledge of the world! i can agree on the waste of time part, so i'll stop responding to you as well :wtf: |
I dont even know what you meant by that statement.
Listen pal...everytime i said something u came at me with an irrelevant topic cus u couldnt debate the current one....maybe if u stay on topic u would seem more credibal. |
|
|
| euphoria |
I dont really want to jump into a debate with anyone but I will say this...
There is a punishment for every crime, he got what he deserved. I would rather him dead than to pay for him to get 3 squares and a cell to sleep in. |
|
|
| sandstorm03 |
| quote: | Originally posted by tiesto14
yes i do....but blame Clinton for that mistake. |
How was what Clinton did a mistake?
How many deaths have there been since Bush took office & the Bush before him? |
|
|
| bogartgreens |
| quote: | Originally posted by tiesto14
I dont even know what you meant by that statement.
Listen pal...everytime i said something u came at me with an irrelevant topic cus u couldnt debate the current one....maybe if u stay on topic u would seem more credibal. |
ahem...that's "credible"
yea im a leftie, but good riddance to zarqawi...even though its not gonna change a thing...
oh and bush has stated that troops will remain in iraq til at least the first quarter of 2009 when the new president is sworn in (which doesnt happen til the end of jan.) and *edit - then it'll be up to whoever is in office to make the decision |
|
|
|
|
