|
abu musab al-zarqawi is dead (pg. 8)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| tiesto14 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Blake
All killing is socially dysfunctional. Sometimes it is necessary (or supposedly necessary). But guess which one of the above 3 types of killing most classifies you as being a psycho? |
If being happy that a vicious man like him was killed makes me a psycho then by all means that is what i am...in fact when they kept showing his picture on the news of him dead i kept smiling. Go watch some of the beheading videos then tell me i am psycho. |
|
|
| Kapedan |
| quote: | Originally posted by tiesto14
Clinton did nothing when Sudan offered Bin Laden.
Clinton did nothing when the USS Cole was bombed.
Clinton did nothing when the African Embassies were bombed.
Clinton did nothing when the Khobar Towers were bombed.
Clinton did nothing when the WTC was bombed the first time.
Clinton did nothing in Somalia except prove America cant take a casualty.
Ya Clinton did a lot to prevent all this.:rolleyes:
|
Also, add that. He was late in Bosnia, and he admitted that, which had cost him alot of lives. Clinton was with Foreign Policy..I dont dislike the guy, I dont mind him at all, but when alot of people blame Bush for alot of problems..it irritates me. Bush had everything coming to him. We wont know how things would of been if there was no 9/11, but then again, everything was to the limmit, so it would of happened. |
|
|
| Taub |
| quote: | Originally posted by tiesto14
Clinton did nothing when Sudan offered Bin Laden.
Clinton did nothing when the USS Cole was bombed.
Clinton did nothing when the African Embassies were bombed.
Clinton did nothing when the Khobar Towers were bombed.
Clinton did nothing when the WTC was bombed the first time.
Clinton did nothing in Somalia except prove America cant take a casualty.
Ya Clinton did a lot to prevent all this.:rolleyes:
Not as many that died when Clinton did nothing for the people of Rwanda...Clinton the first black president? HA! |
Clinton was a smart man, both bushes are idots. Their Foreign policy is lacking, havent done anything that wasn't proven to be benfical to the US.
Clinton didn't have to invade anyone because the ecomony was doing well when he was in office, bush went to war to create "jobs" etc. to bring the economy out of the recession.
What was clinton to do? Just Go invade any country he felt like invading? As its happening now and where will it stop? Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, North korea, Palestine?
What country should clinton have invaded becuase:
the USS Cole was bombed
What country should clinton have invaded becuase:
African Embassies were bombed
What country should clinton have invaded becuase:
Khobar Towers were bombed
What country should clinton have invaded becuase:
the WTC was bombed the first time
Lets bring up Rwanda and Sudan. The US continues to avoid intervening in violent humanitarian crises. In Iraq the people had to be liberated from a cruel dictator becuase he was doing the unthinkable to the people there. But its happening in Sudan and Rawands people are dying by the millions, but no one cares!
I never go the connection between Iraq and 9/11..im and still wating on a good answer |
|
|
| DeRangedMind |
 |
|
|
| Groundhog Boy |
| quote: | Originally posted by Taub
I never go the connection between Iraq and 9/11..im and still wating on a good answer |
Please see my "let's kill all towelheads" comment on the previous page and it'll become clear how they're connected. The connection wasn't intended for you. |
|
|
| LuNaSeA |
| i'm not getting involved in the debate but seriously, tiesto14, what's with you calling people names here? "lefty pig"... "tool" ...etc??? not cool man- but moreover, it just seems very unlike you.... and if you're actually trying to get anyone to read what you're writing, i dont think insults are the best way to go. just my 2 cents. |
|
|
| Konijn |
| quote: | Originally posted by Kapedan
I dont mind him at all, but when alot of people blame Bush for alot of problems..it irritates me. Bush had everything coming to him. |
sure he did. like clinton had it coming from the bush the elder who in turn caught it from reagan. gimme a break.
did clinton receive a cia memo in august of 2001 that said "al qaeda determined to strike in the u.s." which was admittedly ignored?
or, even worse, did clinton's administration intercept phone messages in arabic on september 10th that said "tomorrow is zero hour", which it didn't translate until the 13th?
the fact that people continue to defend bush in the face of one disaster after another would be comical were it not so tragic; do we need video footage of him strangling puppies as part of a naked satanic ritual before it is universally acknowledged that he is the worst president since grant? |
|
|
| sandstorm03 |
Al-Qaida No. 2 praises al-Zarqawi in tape
AP - 52 minutes ago
CAIRO, Egypt - The Al-Jazeera network broadcast a video by al-Qaida No. 2 Ayman al-Zawahri on Friday in which he spoke about Palestinian and Egyptian politics and the situation in Darfur.
yes another bad guy
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/06/09/schuster.column/index.html
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060609/ap_on_re_mi_ea/al_zawahri_tape;_ylt=Ajtu1MPvDzVM4L4.bHDjioqs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ-- |
|
|
| tiesto14 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Taub
Clinton didn't have to invade anyone |
But he did...several times. But most of the armed services lost respect for after Somalia. In fact he bombed and aspirin factory to take attention of his blow job scandal.
| quote: | Originally posted by Taub
because the ecomony was doing well when he was in office, bush went to war to create "jobs" etc. to bring the economy out of the recession. |
I hate when people say Clinton made the economy so good...a riduclous assertion in the days of Gates and Job....as if the dot com boom didnt have most to do with all that.
| quote: | Originally posted by Taub
What was clinton to do? Just Go invade any country he felt like invading? As its happening now and where will it stop? Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, North korea, Palestine? |
He did though...he sent missiles...but not to defend us, just to take attention of his scandal.
| quote: | Originally posted by Taub
What country should clinton have invaded becuase:
the USS Cole was bombed
What country should clinton have invaded becuase:
African Embassies were bombed
What country should clinton have invaded becuase:
Khobar Towers were bombed
What country should clinton have invaded becuase:
the WTC was bombed the first time |
Afghansitan for starters....where the Taliban and Al Qaeda were based.
| quote: | Originally posted by Taub
Lets bring up Rwanda and Sudan. The US continues to avoid intervening in violent humanitarian crises. |
It was GENOCIDE!!!!!! 800,000 people died in a matter of a few hundred days...usually low grade executions with machette...it was OUR duty as civilized people to intervene....now dont get me wrong i think Bush should do something about Joesph Conie (sp?) also and the children og Uganda..we have the resources...we have an obligation to use them.
| quote: | Originally posted by Taub
In Iraq the people had to be liberated from a cruel dictator becuase he was doing the unthinkable to the people there. But its happening in Sudan and Rawands people are dying by the millions, but no one cares!. |
I care.
| quote: | Originally posted by Taub
I never go the connection between Iraq and 9/11..im and still wating on a good answer |
The premise was that Iraq had WMD...which we never found....if you ask me i say they were sent to Syria and many people have agreed. |
|
|
| tiesto14 |
| quote: | Originally posted by LuNaSeA
i'm not getting involved in the debate but seriously, tiesto14, what's with you calling people names here? "lefty pig"... "tool" ...etc??? not cool man- but moreover, it just seems very unlike you.... and if you're actually trying to get anyone to read what you're writing, i dont think insults are the best way to go. just my 2 cents. |
agreed and i apologize. |
|
|
| tiesto14 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Konijn
sure he did. like clinton had it coming from the bush the elder who in turn caught it from reagan. gimme a break.
did clinton receive a cia memo in august of 2001 that said "al qaeda determined to strike in the u.s." which was admittedly ignored?
or, even worse, did clinton's administration intercept phone messages in arabic on september 10th that said "tomorrow is zero hour", which it didn't translate until the 13th?
the fact that people continue to defend bush in the face of one disaster after another would be comical were it not so tragic; do we need video footage of him strangling puppies as part of a naked satanic ritual before it is universally acknowledged that he is the worst president since grant? |
I guess you Bush's critics are right. Every time the president receives unconfirmed, 3-year-old information, he should probably shut down the entire U.S. air system and start rounding up Arab men for questioning. How many other memos did he receive that turned out to be bogus? Come on Nick.
Most people all over this are talking out of both sides of their mouths. On the one hand, they are bashing the president for his failure to do more. On the other hand, the sort of things that the president could have done to prevent this, are precisely the sorts of things that these selfsame critics oppose, on civil liberties grounds.
Many Americans seem to want it both ways. They want their privacy and don't want their government spying on them, but at the same time they seem to want a guarantee that something like 9/11 won't happen again.
If the CIA and FBI don't share data and a terrorist attack occurs, then we'll throw a fit about how our government isn't doing enough to protect us. If they do share data and some innocent Arab ends up having a government file, however, we'll all complain about the invasion of privacy and the near-police state conditions we live under. |
|
|
| Groundhog Boy |
Was this really necessary??
 |
|
|
|
|
