|
Chemical Brothers - Hey Boy Hey Girl (Richard Durand remix) - sample included (pg. 5)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Az |
| quote: | Originally posted by isoterra
i think mike actually has a point this time.. whilst this place is all the better for its negative views, some people take the whole remaking thing far too seriously. it's one thing calling something (which this probably is.. i say probably as i can't get the sample to work) but you'd think durand had insulted everyone's mothers by some of the reactions here |
i think it's fair to say that classics, as well as peoples mothers, shouldn't be ing touched by trance gimps |
|
|
| smakmagik |
| quote: | Originally posted by nikhil chinapa
This link doesn't seem to be working... can someone please repost? |
works fine
sendspace link all the same:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/cyt724 |
|
|
| smakmagik |
reportedly now there is ANOTHER chemical brothers remix out
of their new single 'Do it again'
remixed
by
Sean Tyas. |
|
|
| paulandrews |
| ^You're joking, right? There are quite good remixes of it by Huntemann and Audion. |
|
|
| isoterra |
| quote: | Originally posted by paulandrews
^You're joking, right? |
someone mentioned it in the thread about the tune.. and it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest tbh. i'm assuming it's another 'domino' job |
|
|
| smakmagik |
| quote: | Originally posted by paulandrews
^You're joking, right? There are quite good remixes of it by Huntemann and Audion. |
the Huntemann remix is pretty good
and no, im not joking. |
|
|
| bas |
| quote: | Originally posted by MichaelBoogerd!
I think you're confusing Durand & Mark Norman.
Although the point remains valid :D |
Whatever, same different producer :p |
|
|
| Mike_Foyle |
| quote: | Originally posted by Az
i think it's fair to say that classics, as well as peoples mothers, shouldn't be ing touched by trance gimps |
lol i dont really understand that point of view. i think that you're very narrow minded if you think that classics shouldnt be touched. if they were good enough to ever be considered a classic then why not update them every so often and freshen them up? its as if you consider these tunes sacred. no offense but thats pathetic. sure they occupy a special place in your heart and might be somewhat nostalgic for you or whatever but that doesnt give you the right to declare that "they cant be touched". whats so special about you that you get to make that decision? get over youself, get over people remixing classics and stop moaning. |
|
|
| chucho |
classics can be touched...as long as its a good touch
but come on mike...you know this remix is awful :p |
|
|
| SMC |
| quote: | Originally posted by Mike_Foyle
lol i dont really understand that point of view. i think that you're very narrow minded if you think that classics shouldnt be touched. if they were good enough to ever be considered a classic then why not update them every so often and freshen them up? its as if you consider these tunes sacred. no offense but thats pathetic. sure they occupy a special place in your heart and might be somewhat nostalgic for you or whatever but that doesnt give you the right to declare that "they cant be touched". whats so special about you that you get to make that decision? get over youself, get over people remixing classics and stop moaning. |
Totally agree. In most genres making covers and interpretations of existing works is embraced and totally normal. I'm absolutely not saying one can't have opinions about specific remakes, but saying there is something wrong with working with material previously written by someone else is just silly. |
|
|
| Mr.Mystery |
| quote: | Originally posted by Mike_Foyle
lol i dont really understand that point of view. i think that you're very narrow minded if you think that classics shouldnt be touched. if they were good enough to ever be considered a classic then why not update them every so often and freshen them up? |
They don't remix Stairway To Heaven every couple of years, do they?
They are classics because they are good enough as they are. They do not need any remakes. |
|
|
| Clovis |
| quote: | Originally posted by Mike_Foyle
lol i dont really understand that point of view. i think that you're very narrow minded if you think that classics shouldnt be touched. if they were good enough to ever be considered a classic then why not update them every so often and freshen them up? its as if you consider these tunes sacred. no offense but thats pathetic. sure they occupy a special place in your heart and might be somewhat nostalgic for you or whatever but that doesnt give you the right to declare that "they cant be touched". whats so special about you that you get to make that decision? get over youself, get over people remixing classics and stop moaning. |
I'm sure his opinion might change if every 2007 rework, re-hash, re-version wasn't complete ing and a total disgrace to the originals.
I mean, the list could go on for pages now of horrible examples of this. Its just guys re-hashing old material so it sounds fresh to n00bs. Heres an idea, why not just PLAY SOME OLD TRACKS now and then... |
|
|
|
|
