|
[girls]something ive been wanting to ask for a long time (pg. 15)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Orbax |
| quote: | Originally posted by trancebrat
Thank you |
and out of ign nowhere its Amber |
|
|
| trancebrat |
| quote: | Originally posted by Orbax
and out of ign nowhere its Amber |
I lurk from time to time |
|
|
| trancebrat |
| You deleted me on MSN so no meow for you |
|
|
| Clovis |
| quote: | Originally posted by trancebrat
You deleted me on MSN so no meow for you |
You never post in COR anymore so -infinity meows for you :mad: |
|
|
| trancebrat |
| quote: | Originally posted by Clovis
You never post in COR anymore so -infinity meows for you :mad: |
Pffffft I'm posting now aren't I? :gsmile: |
|
|
| MrJiveBoJingles |
I think that a lack of moderation, a tendency toward extremism, is more common among men than women.
Men are more numerous than women at both extremes of IQ (130+ IQ and retarded), more likely to murder many, many people, more likely to die for fanatical causes, and do all sorts of other awful, extreme things.
My hypothesis is that they are also more likely to become obsessively, single-mindedly driven toward a goal, which is often a prerequisite for getting to the "top" of a field.
One could make a silly, pat sociobiological argument that it generally doesn't "pay," evolutionarily, for women to be obsessed about anything other than beautifying themselves and raising their children, and so they have in general inherited a tendency to do just that. But sociobiology consists mostly of "just-so" stories that any person of reasonable intelligence could think up in their spare time. Not anything conclusive there, at least that I've seen. It could be biological, social, or both. |
|
|
| Orbax |
| quote: | Originally posted by trancebrat
You deleted me on MSN so no meow for you |
what no i didnt you blocked me |
|
|
| beats and beeps |
| quote: | Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
A think that a lack of moderation, a tendency toward extremism, is more common among men than women.
Men are more numerous than women at both extremes of IQ (130+ IQ and retarded), more likely to murder many, many people, more likely to die for fanatical causes, and do all sorts of other awful, extreme things.
My hypothesis is that they are also more likely to become obsessively, single-mindedly driven toward a goal, which is often a prerequisite for getting to the "top" of a field.
One could make a silly, pat sociobiological argument that it generally doesn't "pay," evolutionarily, for women to be obsessed about anything other than beautifying themselves and raising their children, and so they have in general inherited a tendency to do just that. But sociobiology consists mostly of "just-so" stories that any person of reasonable intelligence could think up in their spare time. Not anything conclusive there, at least that I've seen. It could be biological, social, or both. |
good points. I wasn't aware that men had higher ratios of both geniuses and retards. Thats very interesting. |
|
|
| kr00t0n |
| quote: | Originally posted by Slylee
oh PUHLEEASE! i was making this same ing argument in my thread about gays being pointless and that's when u started hating me:( |
I never stated that I agreed with the way the world works, just offered up a viable theory as to why it does :p |
|
|
| kr00t0n |
| quote: | Originally posted by Andryuha
Why were men dominant since the beginning?
|
Because in the beginning, physical prowess was all that mattered, we didn't have the intricate social web back then, was simply he who clubs the hardest wins. |
|
|
| Lilith |
| quote: | Originally posted by kr00t0n
Because in the beginning, physical prowess was all that mattered, we didn't have the intricate social web back then, was simply he who clubs the hardest wins. |
Oh yes, because there's so much living history and written records to back up that theory :haha: |
|
|
|
|
