|
~+~+~ Trance can't possibly be your fav type genre, is it? ~+~+~ (pg. 5)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| SMC |
| quote: | Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
American term for late '50s, '60s, and '70s rock.
Basically rock that was around in the same period as "classic" cars. |
Duh, i know what it refers to, but i didn't ask you the question. I just think it's a stupid term that lumps together an enormous amount of dissimilar artists and styles of music. Just take The Beatles, Led Zeppeling and Pink Floyd that were mentioned in this thread as an example, they sound nothing alike. It's not the most enlightened persons who use the term, like the poster he replied to, and yet he tried to make some stupid point comparing whatever music it is he likes to "classic rock". |
|
|
| SMC |
| quote: | Originally posted by zen_zo
Why can we say that? Isnt it obvious Brazil is better than Italy in soccer? Isnt it obvious that Russians are good in chess than say people from Poland? Isnt it obvious that Guitar is better than Mandorin?
When soooooo many more people like melodic trance... and so less people actually like jazz.. than isnt it obvious that trance is better than jazz? Just cos 100 people like jazz and media and movies given more attention to them dosent mean that jazz is better. Dont forget that 100,000 people like trance and has approved it and love it... Trance anyday, anytime is better than jazz.
There is a clear uniform agreement that trance is better than other glamorized, publisized and hyped genres like jazz.
So all the genres just cant get along with other low quality genres because you invent and call your own genre to preserve your color and . |
Isn't it obvious that music is not a game or a competitive sport? Isn't it obvious that Italy is the reigning soccer world champion? Isn't it obvious that saying more people like jazz than trance is absolutely ridiculous? |
|
|
| Trance-MB |
I think there are enough TA's who also like rock or other genres. But if I'm asked for my favourite I would say it is Trance. I also like U2, A-ha, Pet Shop Boys, Level42, Bon Jovi, Tears for Fears, Genesis, Franky Goes To Hollywood.
| quote: | | Why can we say that? Isnt it obvious Brazil is better than Italy in soccer? Isnt it obvious that Russians are good in chess than say people from Poland? Isnt it obvious that Guitar is better than Mandorin? When soooooo many more people like melodic trance... and so less people actually like jazz.. than isnt it obvious that trance is better than jazz? Just cos 100 people like jazz and media and movies given more attention to them dosent mean that jazz is better. Dont forget that 100,000 people like trance and has approved it and love it... Trance anyday, anytime is better than jazz. |
That's tricky, you cannot measure taste, but you can count goals and chess wins. Comparing Jazz with Trance says more about the taste of people than something about which is best. If I would says Jazz is better because it exists longer that also has some truth in it.
That the most sold US car is a Ford F150 doesn't make this car the best. I actually is a piece of ... according to our British Top Gear friends..... |
|
|
| ohbeone |
| quote: | Originally posted by SMC
and yet he tried to make some stupid point comparing whatever music it is he likes to "classic rock". |
And here I thought you were civil. Perhaps you'd like to enlighten on why my point was stupid. I wasn't comparing my music to classic rock. There are many people who like 'classic rock' and state that as their favorite genre. Who cares what the exact definition is. Music and appreciation of anything is subjective. Pretentious lyrics as one poster said does not command, DEmand or even interest me into finding the deeper meaning. I'm not sure why it's hard to understand that a majority preference does not = something being better. It just means more people like it.
To ME, trance/house is the best music. To others it's not. Anyone stating one music is better than another it is just an opinion. Talk about popularity all you want though. |
|
|
| MrJiveBoJingles |
| quote: | Originally posted by zen_zo
Why can we say that? Isnt it obvious Brazil is better than Italy in soccer? Isnt it obvious that Russians are good in chess than say people from Poland? |
You're talking about different things. There's an obvious, undisputed, and clear standard in soccer and chess: whether one side outscores / defeats the other one. That isn't the case in music.
| quote: | | Isnt it obvious that Guitar is better than Mandorin? |
How is it "obvious" that a guitar is better than a mandolin?
| quote: | | When soooooo many more people like melodic trance... and so less people actually like jazz.. than isnt it obvious that trance is better than jazz? Just cos 100 people like jazz and media and movies given more attention to them dosent mean that jazz is better. Dont forget that 100,000 people like trance and has approved it and love it... Trance anyday, anytime is better than jazz. |
All this means is that trance is "better" at being popular. If your standard is mere popularity, then artists like Soulja Boy and Britney Spears kick any trance artist's ass. Does that mean you think that Soulja Boy and Britney Spears are "better" than trance? I certainly hope not.
| quote: | | So all the genres just cant get along with other low quality genres because you invent and call your own genre to preserve your color and . |
I'm disappointed that you think "low popularity" and "low quality" are the same thing.
Is J.K. Rowling a better novelist than Nabokov or James Joyce? LOL. |
|
|
| SMC |
| quote: | Originally posted by ohbeone
And here I thought you were civil. Perhaps you'd like to enlighten on why my point was stupid. I wasn't comparing my music to classic rock. There are many people who like 'classic rock' and state that as their favorite genre. Who cares what the exact definition is. Music and appreciation of anything is subjective. Pretentious lyrics as one poster said does not command, DEmand or even interest me into finding the deeper meaning. I'm not sure why it's hard to understand that a majority preference does not = something being better. It just means more people like it.
To ME, trance/house is the best music. To others it's not. Anyone stating one music is better than another it is just an opinion. Talk about popularity all you want though. |
Who are you talking to? |
|
|
| ohbeone |
| quote: | Originally posted by SMC
Who are you talking to? |
That would be you. You asked me what classic rock is then made that comment to someone else about a stupid point of comparing my music to classic rock. I assumed you were speaking about me. Apologies if you were not. |
|
|
| SMC |
| quote: | Originally posted by ohbeone
That would be you. You asked me what classic rock is then made that comment to someone else about a stupid point of comparing my music to classic rock. I assumed you were speaking about me. Apologies if you were not. |
Yes, but then you wrote a whole lotta bollocks that has nothing to do with anything i've written. |
|
|
| ohbeone |
| quote: | Originally posted by SMC
Yes, but then you wrote a whole lotta bollocks that has nothing to do with anything i've written. |
It sort of did actually. If you thought my point was stupid, perhaps I was putting it in a different way. But yes the first sentence or 2 was directed at you. I'm not sure why it matters if what I said had anything to do with what you said. Perhaps I just wanted you to hear it anyway. And perhaps you'll actually get around to explaining why my point was stupid. |
|
|
| PETRAN |
| quote: | Originally posted by zen_zo
Why can we say that? Isnt it obvious Brazil is better than Italy in soccer? Isnt it obvious that Russians are good in chess than say people from Poland? Isnt it obvious that Guitar is better than Mandorin?
When soooooo many more people like melodic trance... and so less people actually like jazz.. than isnt it obvious that trance is better than jazz? Just cos 100 people like jazz and media and movies given more attention to them dosent mean that jazz is better. Dont forget that 100,000 people like trance and has approved it and love it... Trance anyday, anytime is better than jazz.
There is a clear uniform agreement that trance is better than other glamorized, publisized and hyped genres like jazz.
So all the genres just cant get along with other low quality genres because you invent and call your own genre to preserve your color and . |
"argumentum ad populum" kid. What most people like/support/believe doesn't mean that its better or correct. This is why (as JBJ noted) Britney Spears and 50 Cent don't represent the best of what modern music has to offer. Cool?
In musical terms though, Jazz can clearly be considered superior to trance-or any other form of EDM for that matter- because it involves a higher amount of musicianship, that is, the musical complexity of jazz is far superior (well it can't even compare) to trance. The same goes for "classic rock" (this term is not good since there were about one hundred different rock genres-or more- in total during the 50s, 60s and 70s. I mean Pink Floyd were a space/prog rock band, Led Zep were more proto-metal/hard-rock with a progressive hint etc.) This also doesn't mean that jazz or classic rock is better then trance bacause music is about personal/subjective preference and not about the objective rating of a product's craftsmanship (although this factor can be taken into account when one's judges the aesthetic qualities of music). Both Jazz and Classic rock are technically superior to trance, but which one is better is left to every single human being on earth to decide.
(well, thats what the books say but we all know the truth lol) |
|
|
| Trance-MB |
| quote: | Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
You're talking about different things. There's an obvious, undisputed, and clear standard in soccer and chess: whether one side outscores / defeats the other one. That isn't the case in music.
How is it "obvious" that a guitar is better than a mandolin?
All this means is that trance is "better" at being popular. If your standard is mere popularity, then artists like Soulja Boy and Britney Spears kick any trance artist's ass. Does that mean you think that Soulja Boy and Britney Spears are "better" than trance? I certainly hope not.
I'm disappointed that you think "low popularity" and "low quality" are the same thing.
Is J.K. Rowling a better novelist than Nabokov or James Joyce? LOL. |
If this isn't clear enough I don't know how to explain it... |
|
|
| PETRAN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Project-K
Who?
lololoolololololololololololol |
???? |
|
|
|
|