|
~+~+~ Trance can't possibly be your fav type genre, is it? ~+~+~ (pg. 6)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| zen_zo |
| quote: | Originally posted by SMC
Yes, but then you wrote a whole lotta bollocks that has nothing to do with anything i've written. |
It sort of did actually.:o |
|
|
| SMC |
| quote: | Originally posted by ohbeone
It sort of did actually. If you thought my point was stupid, perhaps I was putting it in a different way. But yes the first sentence or 2 was directed at you. I'm not sure why it matters if what I said had anything to do with what you said. Perhaps I just wanted you to hear it anyway. And perhaps you'll actually get around to explaining why my point was stupid. |
Another time maybe. |
|
|
| zen_zo |
| quote: | Originally posted by PETRAN
(well, thats what the books say but we all know the truth lol) |
+1
Long live trance, jazz. |
|
|
| ohbeone |
| quote: | Originally posted by PETRAN
the musical complexity of jazz is far superior (well it can't even compare) to trance. |
This is still subjective using the word 'superior'. if you want to say jazz is more complex, that might fly...but the complexity is superior doesn't quite fly...in my mind anyway. Trance is itself a broad term. I'd like to see the greatest 'jazz' (also broad term) musicians write a great 'trance' track on the level of what I consider to be great 'trance'.
Just because there's a 4/4 beat doesn't mean there can't be many complexities and intricacies going on. |
|
|
| ohbeone |
| quote: | Originally posted by SMC
Another time maybe. |
No thanks. It's clear you're not here for real discussion. |
|
|
| zen_zo |
jazz < trance
no matter how much american movies glamorise it. |
|
|
| SMC |
| quote: | Originally posted by ohbeone
No thanks. It's clear you're not here for real discussion. |
Actually you still haven't answered the simple question i initially posed to you, before you jumped to different things i had no interest in discussing with you. But nevermind, really. |
|
|
| jupiterone |
| quote: | Originally posted by zen_zo
jazz < trance
|
alright, we get your point. |
|
|
| zen_zo |
| quote: | Originally posted by SMC
Actually you still haven't answered the simple question i initially posed to you, before you jumped to different things i had no interest in discussing with you. But nevermind, really. |
Now thats a classic typical TA 'elitist' response. |
|
|
| ohbeone |
| quote: | Originally posted by SMC
Actually you still haven't answered the simple question i initially posed to you, before you jumped to different things i had no interest in discussing with you. But nevermind, really. |
Yes I did. I said I don't care what the definition is I am simply using the term as most people do. If you want to discuss what the term classic rock really means start a new thread. This discussion is about if people really state 'trance' as their favorite genre. I'm not going to go off on what trance really means...I'm going to use the broad term just as we all are with 'jazz', 'classic rock', 'pop' etc.
*edit:
to add to that...send a pm in the future if you're interested in one on one conversation. I could care less if you wanted to hear my other points or not. You're not the only one reading this thread. |
|
|
| paulandrews |
| quote: | Originally posted by zen_zo
Now thats a classic typical TA 'elitist' response. |
How do you know? You just registered recently. |
|
|
| leph555 |
| we are getting nowhere with these kind of discussions |
|
|
|
|
